Ben Franklin
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2003
- Posts
- 580
MERGER AND FRAGMENTATION POLICY
SOURCE – In April 2009, the Executive Board adopted major revisions to ALPA Merger and Fragmentation Policy. Future amendments will be noted where they occur in the policy and will include the governing body and amendment date.
PART 1 –STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND PREAMBLE
The purpose of ALPA Merger Policy is to provide protection for the employment interests of ALPA represented flight deck crew members by establishing orderly and expeditious processes for (1) concluding a joint collective bargaining agreement (JCBA), (2) concluding the fair and equitable merger of seniority lists and (3) merging Master Executive Councils (MECs).
The policy rests on a number of premises: • A successful merger requires the full support of ALPA MEC and Local Council leadership for
its implementation. • ALPA members will be kept informed and up to date through responsible communications,
and an environment developed to foster unity and strength in negotiating the JCBA.
• Unity of purpose, based on close cooperation among Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) members and between the participating MECs, is essential to bringing about a work force that will obtain benefit from the merger through successful negotiations.
• Integration of seniority lists is one step in the entire merger process; the merger is one transaction, consisting of the seniority integration process, the contract negotiation process, the ratification process, and the transition process (both as to the carriers and ALPA governance), all leading to a single pilot group and MEC.
This policy establishes processes based on these premises, to be followed by pilot groups from the outset through the completion of the merger. However, broad authority is provided to MECs to design and agree on alternative processes that meet their own needs. The basic policy serves as a “governing” process in the event that the MECs do not desire to or cannot reach such agreements.
The policy recognizes that MECs may be required to deal with a variety of types of corporate transactions and that innovation by MECs dealing with different types of corporate transactions may best serve the interests of their pilot groups and ALPA. MECs are strongly encouraged to consider using flexible arrangements available under policy to design processes tailored to the needs of their particular pilot groups and transaction. MECs are encouraged to keep in mind that flexibility is made available in recognition that a “one size fits all” process is not the best approach when dealing with transactions.
This policy provides at the outset that its scope (Part 2B 1) should not be defined in terms of particular types of transactions or the timing or announcement of transactions, all of which are controlled by corporate interests, but rather in terms of situations when there is a need to protect employee interests.
2
ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 45 – MERGER AND FRAGMENTATION POLICY 4/30/09
Thus, a “merger” is defined as a situation where there is a reasonable probability of sufficient operational integration between or among two or more ALPA airlines that there is or will be a need for an integrated seniority list, a JCBA and a merged MEC to adequately protect the employment interests of the flight deck crew members. Its scope also recognizes that MECs may desire to make agreements “at any time” – for example, before there is a “merger” as defined by policy – to enable them to be involved in a potential merger at an early stage. The policy embraces the concept that MECs can enter into such agreements.
The policy provides for its implementation using either of two methods.
Under one method, the involved MECs may determine “at any time” (Part 2B 2) that it is in the best interests of their flight deck crew members to enter into agreements which provide for an alternative process for seniority integration,negotiating a JCBA or both. If this determination is made,with the approval of the President, the MECs have wide latitude to fashion their own process, subject only to meeting certain fundamental requirements of policy (Parts 2B 2 and 2C 1).
This feature of the policy provides the MECs with the flexibility to deal with their particular situation. It is also important that these policy provisions enable MECs to make these agreements “at any time,” even before there is a “merger” as defined by policy, so that cooperating MECs can be involved in a potential merger at an early stage.
Under the second method, if there is a “merger” as defined by policy and the MECs do not enter into agreements which provide for an alternative process for seniority integration and negotiating a JCBA, the policy is implemented through a “Process Implementation Date” (PID). The policy calls for the PID to be established on the earlier of the date on which the Executive Council, in its judgment, determines there is a merger or the date on which the President agrees with the determination of all involved MECs that there is a merger (Part 2B 3).
The policy also provides MECs with the opportunity to make two additional types of agreements on processing their merger, whether functioning under the first or second method described above.
1. MECs, with approval of the Executive Council, may voluntarily enter into an agreement to establish an Interim Joint Governing Council (IJGC) which will function as a single MEC for purposes of making joint decisions on defined subjects relating to the merger other than seniority integration (Part 2C 2).
2. MECs are required to make an effort to negotiate and enter into an agreement to establish terms for merger of their MECs. These provisions encourage and enable cooperating MECs to carry out a smooth transition by agreeing on terms for their MEC merger.
Based on experience, use of the procedures in this policy (Part 3B) for negotiation of the JCBA or any alternative process should be accompanied by recognition that:
• The JCBA is the means by which the employment interests of the flight deck crew members are protected and economic benefit – value for ALPA members – is obtained from the merger.
• Unity of purpose is essential to successful JCBA negotiations. 3
ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 45 – MERGER AND FRAGMENTATION POLICY 4/30/09
• Negotiating sessions should be scheduled consistent with the high priority goal of concluding the JCBA prior to the date for conclusion of the seniority list integration process.
Many years of experience call for a seniority integration policy based on the following principles:
1. This policy calls for fair and equitable integration of seniority lists, but aside from the specific requirements embodied in policy, what appears to be “fair and equitable” typically differs depending upon the eyes of the beholder and it may be difficult to reach a consensus or there may be no consensus on what is “fair and equitable.”
2. The merger representatives are strongly encouraged to consider themselves primarily as negotiators charged with reaching agreement, to use negotiating skills and to make a strong and focused effort to reach agreement through negotiations or mediation, without invoking arbitration.
3. The merger representatives for the pilot groups bear responsibility for the integrated seniority list, with ALPA having no position on the merits.
4. The merger representatives should recognize the difficulty of forecasting what will occur well into the future.
5. ALPA’s role through this policy is solely to provide the process by which the pilot groups conclude the integrated seniority list for presentation to management, using arbitration if necessary, together with the opportunity for MECs to agree on alternative processes that meet their own needs.
6. If agreement cannot be reached, final and binding arbitration is mandated by this policy on unresolved issues. Each pilot group must recognize that the arbitration process involves the assumption of very substantial risk to the interests of the pilot group, since there is no means of predicting the outcome.
Experience also calls for cooperative arrangements between the participating MECs prior to the merger of the MECs, either through formal governance arrangements permitted by this policy or informal means, if the pilot groups are to be brought together as a unified work force that will obtain benefit from the merger.
SOURCE – In April 2009, the Executive Board adopted major revisions to ALPA Merger and Fragmentation Policy. Future amendments will be noted where they occur in the policy and will include the governing body and amendment date.
PART 1 –STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND PREAMBLE
The purpose of ALPA Merger Policy is to provide protection for the employment interests of ALPA represented flight deck crew members by establishing orderly and expeditious processes for (1) concluding a joint collective bargaining agreement (JCBA), (2) concluding the fair and equitable merger of seniority lists and (3) merging Master Executive Councils (MECs).
The policy rests on a number of premises: • A successful merger requires the full support of ALPA MEC and Local Council leadership for
its implementation. • ALPA members will be kept informed and up to date through responsible communications,
and an environment developed to foster unity and strength in negotiating the JCBA.
• Unity of purpose, based on close cooperation among Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) members and between the participating MECs, is essential to bringing about a work force that will obtain benefit from the merger through successful negotiations.
• Integration of seniority lists is one step in the entire merger process; the merger is one transaction, consisting of the seniority integration process, the contract negotiation process, the ratification process, and the transition process (both as to the carriers and ALPA governance), all leading to a single pilot group and MEC.
This policy establishes processes based on these premises, to be followed by pilot groups from the outset through the completion of the merger. However, broad authority is provided to MECs to design and agree on alternative processes that meet their own needs. The basic policy serves as a “governing” process in the event that the MECs do not desire to or cannot reach such agreements.
The policy recognizes that MECs may be required to deal with a variety of types of corporate transactions and that innovation by MECs dealing with different types of corporate transactions may best serve the interests of their pilot groups and ALPA. MECs are strongly encouraged to consider using flexible arrangements available under policy to design processes tailored to the needs of their particular pilot groups and transaction. MECs are encouraged to keep in mind that flexibility is made available in recognition that a “one size fits all” process is not the best approach when dealing with transactions.
This policy provides at the outset that its scope (Part 2B 1) should not be defined in terms of particular types of transactions or the timing or announcement of transactions, all of which are controlled by corporate interests, but rather in terms of situations when there is a need to protect employee interests.
2
ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 45 – MERGER AND FRAGMENTATION POLICY 4/30/09
Thus, a “merger” is defined as a situation where there is a reasonable probability of sufficient operational integration between or among two or more ALPA airlines that there is or will be a need for an integrated seniority list, a JCBA and a merged MEC to adequately protect the employment interests of the flight deck crew members. Its scope also recognizes that MECs may desire to make agreements “at any time” – for example, before there is a “merger” as defined by policy – to enable them to be involved in a potential merger at an early stage. The policy embraces the concept that MECs can enter into such agreements.
The policy provides for its implementation using either of two methods.
Under one method, the involved MECs may determine “at any time” (Part 2B 2) that it is in the best interests of their flight deck crew members to enter into agreements which provide for an alternative process for seniority integration,negotiating a JCBA or both. If this determination is made,with the approval of the President, the MECs have wide latitude to fashion their own process, subject only to meeting certain fundamental requirements of policy (Parts 2B 2 and 2C 1).
This feature of the policy provides the MECs with the flexibility to deal with their particular situation. It is also important that these policy provisions enable MECs to make these agreements “at any time,” even before there is a “merger” as defined by policy, so that cooperating MECs can be involved in a potential merger at an early stage.
Under the second method, if there is a “merger” as defined by policy and the MECs do not enter into agreements which provide for an alternative process for seniority integration and negotiating a JCBA, the policy is implemented through a “Process Implementation Date” (PID). The policy calls for the PID to be established on the earlier of the date on which the Executive Council, in its judgment, determines there is a merger or the date on which the President agrees with the determination of all involved MECs that there is a merger (Part 2B 3).
The policy also provides MECs with the opportunity to make two additional types of agreements on processing their merger, whether functioning under the first or second method described above.
1. MECs, with approval of the Executive Council, may voluntarily enter into an agreement to establish an Interim Joint Governing Council (IJGC) which will function as a single MEC for purposes of making joint decisions on defined subjects relating to the merger other than seniority integration (Part 2C 2).
2. MECs are required to make an effort to negotiate and enter into an agreement to establish terms for merger of their MECs. These provisions encourage and enable cooperating MECs to carry out a smooth transition by agreeing on terms for their MEC merger.
Based on experience, use of the procedures in this policy (Part 3B) for negotiation of the JCBA or any alternative process should be accompanied by recognition that:
• The JCBA is the means by which the employment interests of the flight deck crew members are protected and economic benefit – value for ALPA members – is obtained from the merger.
• Unity of purpose is essential to successful JCBA negotiations. 3
ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 45 – MERGER AND FRAGMENTATION POLICY 4/30/09
• Negotiating sessions should be scheduled consistent with the high priority goal of concluding the JCBA prior to the date for conclusion of the seniority list integration process.
Many years of experience call for a seniority integration policy based on the following principles:
1. This policy calls for fair and equitable integration of seniority lists, but aside from the specific requirements embodied in policy, what appears to be “fair and equitable” typically differs depending upon the eyes of the beholder and it may be difficult to reach a consensus or there may be no consensus on what is “fair and equitable.”
2. The merger representatives are strongly encouraged to consider themselves primarily as negotiators charged with reaching agreement, to use negotiating skills and to make a strong and focused effort to reach agreement through negotiations or mediation, without invoking arbitration.
3. The merger representatives for the pilot groups bear responsibility for the integrated seniority list, with ALPA having no position on the merits.
4. The merger representatives should recognize the difficulty of forecasting what will occur well into the future.
5. ALPA’s role through this policy is solely to provide the process by which the pilot groups conclude the integrated seniority list for presentation to management, using arbitration if necessary, together with the opportunity for MECs to agree on alternative processes that meet their own needs.
6. If agreement cannot be reached, final and binding arbitration is mandated by this policy on unresolved issues. Each pilot group must recognize that the arbitration process involves the assumption of very substantial risk to the interests of the pilot group, since there is no means of predicting the outcome.
Experience also calls for cooperative arrangements between the participating MECs prior to the merger of the MECs, either through formal governance arrangements permitted by this policy or informal means, if the pilot groups are to be brought together as a unified work force that will obtain benefit from the merger.