Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Allow me to set the record straight

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
If your premise is that not having a college degree (ie level of education) doesn't hamper your aviation career because all that matters is having the ability to fly, then it follows that graduating high school doesn't matter either.....or middle school. By middle school we have basic reading skills and can do simple arithmetic, which is all that is needed read manuals, figure performance, etc.

Silly me, if only I'd dropped out of high school and flown my brains out after getting my PPL in 11th grade, instead of wasting all that time finishing high school and going to college....I'd be so much further ahead now!
 
Thats not my premise at all. As I said above, my disagreement with Frontier is simple...a pilot with a college education is not necessarily better than one without. Did I ever state that a college education doesn't benefit a person? Nope. Did I ever state that a pilot wouldn't be a better pilot had they received further education? Nope.
 
Frontier,

I did reread your post, and I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that perhaps your wording was misleading. If your point is that any GIVEN pilot would be a better pilot if they had a college education, you have no argument from me there. The way you worded your statement, however, leads one to believe that you are saying that a pilot that went to college is better than another pilot that didn't. That simply isn't always accurate..
 
Last edited:
Here is my case in point. In the nineties many majors were using a point system to select their interview hopefuls. Categories included licenses/certificates, flight experience, military experience, and education. From my understanding one major would award one point for a BS and another for a Masters. If the applicant only had and Associates degree than that applicant was not awarded any educational points. If the applicant chose to finish his/her education after high school than that applicant had a point subtracted from his total score.

Now was this major “STEROTYPING”? I guess, if that airline made the observation that most possessing a degree from a higher learning institution was more educated than those with out. However if that is true than they were also “STEROTYPING” by the thought that many ex-military pilots possess experience that civilian pilots do not. But if that is true than maybe they should get rid of the ATP and time requirements? Isn’t that “STEROTYPING” the idea that Licenses and flight time has something to do with experience.

Maybe in the future to avoid all sorts of possible “STEROTYPES” we should banish all forms of standard. People should be hired via the lottery. That way it would be impossible to say “THAT’S NOT FAIR. JUST BECAUSE THAT PERSON DECIDED TO BETTER THEMSELVES BY _(fill in the blank college, military, type ratings etc…..) SHOULD NOT MEAN THAT THEY SHOULD GET HIRED BEFORE ME. THAT’S STREOTYPING!!!!!!”

I believe that in today’s world of political correctness it is still ok to have standards. Lots of other industries do and so does aviation. Here is the secret. That is why the airlines that pay better have different standards than regional carriers that pay much less while some of the equipment/routes between the regionals and majors are similar if not identical.



Weird huh?
 
I also never said that a person shouldn't receive credit for the extra education that they have received. If there are two equally qualified candidates, and one has more education...obviously the more educated one should get the job. No argument there. Once again, I'm simply stating that because a pilot may not have a college degree, it shouldn't put him in a stereotype of automatically being an idiot. As mentioned before, according to several internal sources I have talked to, Southwest Airlines has plenty of pilots without degrees. I even heard of one or more with a GED. What were they thinking by hiring such uneducated people? After all, its not like they are the only major airline making money right now, or that they have a nearly perfect safety record.
 
I too have met many good pilots that chose not to attend/complete college. The ones that “made it” are clearly an exception to the rule. And using them as an example to tell younger pilots that if you want to fly professionally than college is a waste is equivalent to saying “GEE COLLIN POWELL CAME FROM THE HOOD SOOOOO AS A FOURTUNE 500 COMPANY WE SHOULD CANCEL THE JOB FAIRS AT THE BIG TEN SCHOOLS AND GO DO SOME STREET INTERVIEWS OUTSIDE OF THE PROJECTS INSTEAD.”



Taking an exception to the rule like Southwest pilots who chose not to go to college and making an overgeneralization like “you don’t need to go to college” is worse than stereotyping……..it’s stupid.



A truer sentence to a young person would read:

“GETTING A DEGREE IS NOT REQUIRED BUT IS CLOSE. THERE ARE A FEW WHO HAVE MADE IT TO THE LEVEL THAT MOST AIM FOR WITHOUT A DEGREE BUT THEY ARE FEW AND FAR BETWEEN. IT IS ALWAYS BETTER TO COMPLETE AT LEAST A FOUR YEAR PROGRAM BECAUSE IT MAKES YOU A MORE WELL INFORMED PERSON, INCREACES YOU EARNING POTENTIAL BECAUSE YOU HAVE A MUCH BETTER CHANCE AT GETTING TO A MAJOR, AND MAKES YOU MORE WELL ROUNDED PERSON SHOULD YOU GET FURLOGHED OR LOOSE YOUR MEDICAL.

YOUNG PERSON, IF SOMEONE TIRES TO GIVE YOU ADVICE TO NOT GO TO COLLEGE THAN REMEMBER THESE TRUISMISMS AND TELL THEM TO STOP COMING UP WITH RIDICULUS EXCEPTIONS AND FALSE STREOTYPS TO JUSTIFY THEIR DECISION TO NOT GO ON TO FINISHING THEIR DEGREE.”
 
Last edited:
My message to young people is similar to yours: Go to college, better your education, work hard, and please..learn how to spell better than FrontierFan! :) (sorry, I'm joking...couldn't resist). Your remarks just rubbed off as being rather insulting to myself and possibly others that have worked hard, but may have educated ourselves in other ways than going to college classes. I am in no way bashing someone for getting a degree. In none of my posts do I feel as though I gave that message. If I ever get time I would like to get a degree myself....but in the meantime I don't have one, and I don't feel like I should be looked down upon because of it.
 
I can pick up what your layin down and I hope you will be able to find the time and money to finish things up. The sad thing is that there are others on that five page thread that actually are trying to justify their decision to not start/finish their degree because Bill Gates, the CEO of JetBlue, and a very small group of airline pilots made the same decision.



An interesting poll should be posted on the Major and Fractional page to see what they think. I am sure that the players of the minor league baseball team have a different opinion than the winners of the major league World Series.



Night.
 
Hey,

I found this great job in aviation. It requires an AS degree at minimum (MUST have a degree) and has a strong potential to earn a six figure income by the individual's 30th birthday. Heck, the hiring forecast is fairly strong as well.
 
smellthejeta said:
Hey,

I found this great job in aviation. It requires an AS degree at minimum (MUST have a degree) and has a strong potential to earn a six figure income by the individual's 30th birthday. Heck, the hiring forecast is fairly strong as well.
That would be Air Traffic Control. One occupation in which I have the utmost respect for. What those guys (and girls) can do up at ORD every day takes talent...not just skill or education.
 
Last edited:
smellthejeta said:
Hey,

I found this great job in aviation. It requires an AS degree at minimum (MUST have a degree) and has a strong potential to earn a six figure income by the individual's 30th birthday. Heck, the hiring forecast is fairly strong as well.
Hahaha...nobody said you had to be a college grad to make a killing as a comedian!

Just remember kid, the Dice man said, "It's not about laughter, it's about comedy!"
 
You guys are crazy! I cant believe I just read that, im exhausted. Maybe we should just go flying and have fun.
 
The guy who just blasted into space, in SpaceShipOne, never finished high school... Maybe now he will have time to go back and get his GED so he can further his flying career. LOL

B
 
Frontierboy,
You are a tool. While going to university is a good thing, your pissing in the wind with your theory. Please tell Chuck Yeager that you are a "better pilot" than him because you hold a degree and he doe's not.
What type of degree do you have? I am interested to know. Don't bother telling us that an arts degree makes you a better pilot or well rounded person, I will die of laughter. Most companies require degree's because it helps cull the large amount of applicants. Yes it helps some people aquire a better academic ability, however some of us, unlike you, are smart enough to get our sh1t together without having to "find ourselves" at college. All army pilots with no degree must be of a sub-standard species then? is this what you think.
Pull your head out of you a$$.
Any advice for future pilots, get a degree. It doe's not make you better, only more competitive.
 
A degree is a must in this industry. You absolutely cannot get to a major airline without one. Although not required, one in aviation is definitely a plus.
 
RiddleMan80 said:
A degree is a must in this industry. You absolutely cannot get to a major airline without one. Although not required, one in aviation is definitely a plus.
First you said "A degree is a must in this industry" and then you said "Although not required, one in aviation is definitely a plus."

I will agree with the latter, definitely a plus. Saying that "you absolutely cannot get into a major without one" is absolutely NOT true, unless for some reason you ONLY consider the legacy carriers as majors. Even at American there are many pilots without degrees.

This thread was started under the false claim that having a degree, no matter the subject somehow makes you a better pilor or candidate which of course is hogwash. The airlines that excude fine pilots with fine records and good experience over another candidate with an English degree are passing over some very good pilots. It's their loss.

IHF
 
It shouldn't matter whether or not you have a degree, it should matter whether or not you can fly an airplane. Altough the college degree is required at most airlines and does help in the selection process, by no means does it make one a better pilot.

As far as having one in aviation, well that's just a matter of choice. I know more pilots with degrees in non-aviation subjects than those with.
 
Good God people! Do you really have nothing better to do than correct someones spelling and grammer errors? This is like politics. Not everyone will agree and you'll never convince them otherwise. It's a waste of time. Now, back to playing video games.
 
SERPICO said:
Frontierboy,
You are a tool. While going to university is a good thing, your pissing in the wind with your theory. Please tell Chuck Yeager that you are a "better pilot" than him because you hold a degree and he doe's not.

Why don't YOU ask Chuck Yeager why he wasn't chosen to become one of the original 7 Mercury astronauts. He can tell you first hand how limiting it can be to not have a college degree. It doesn't mean he wasn't a great pilot. It means that his abilities weren't even considered because he lacked the prerequisite college degree. A degree opens doors. Even more so as you progress further into your aviation career.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top