All Regionals Need To Support Chautauqua

[hhab]

"You are exactly right. Push the Teamsters for a single carrier petition."




A single Carrier petition is a RECOGNITION that CHQ and ex: Republic is represented by same union. It does not do much more than that. It does not automatically combine contracts/ seniority lists etc,etc unless you management agrees to that......

What you people need is solid scope ( combined seniority list and scope ) and good successorship language.
The question is: will your management offer it, and what would you have to give in return.........

 

[Banana Hammock]

Fat Chance I think

I don't think Wexford will let this happen. They are pinning one against the other right now and they want that to continue. As a pilot for SA I am open to the possibility of merging but only with the right agreement. Date of hire? NO WAY. 5 to 1 till date of hire matches, maybe. I guess we'll see what happens.

 

[RJlifer]

Bannana, What do you mean by 5 to 1 until hire date matches??

 

[the turtle]

What you people need is solid scope ( combined seniority list and scope ) and good successorship language.
The question is: will your management offer it, and what would you have to give in return.........


ask any Mesa pilot what they gave up.....a lot.

 

[the turtle]

Bannana, What do you mean by 5 to 1 until hire date matches??

means that when you merge the seniority lists five CHQ guys are listed for every one Shuttle or republick sellout then the new hires come onboard after the intergrated list is recognized by the holding company.

I'd stick all republick on the bottom

 

[KATL8R26L]

chq

ugh raise the sperm count on the deal then we will chop it all up, sounds like gekko all over again,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

 

[Banana Hammock]

5 to 1

Yea, what I mean is 5 CHQ guys then our #1 SA Pilot goes on the Senority list. Then another 5, then our #2 guy. This would stop when date of hire meets between CHQ and Shuttle, then strictly DOH with Republic guys going at the end (their DOH).

 

[Skull-One]

Would SA guys rather get "fenced" (or temporarily seat locked) to the SAABs with their actual seniority or simply absorbed into the jet right away? The training costs could cause Wex to say, "No way" to the latter.

 

[SF340]

A few of us in SA SOC support the CHQ crews. Get what you guys deserve, and do not let them try to f*ck you over like they are our crews and the for that fact all of us with ground based jobs. H*ll we can not even apply with CHQ, because we work for SA, some sort of "Wexford rule"...what the f*ck is that crap!

So good luck guys

 

[Banana Hammock]

Good Question Skull

Well, the way I see it I don't think CHQ will want the saab's back so I think (assume) we would go right into the Jet. Besides, would CHQ have to prove the Saab's again with the FAA if they took them back? I guess I would consider anything. I enjoy the Saab so that is not a problem.