St. Nic
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2008
- Posts
- 658
I disagree, perhaps 30% of us would not be airline pilots, but 100% of those that did would have better paying, more stable jobs without it.
Deregulation made sense when the industry matured and abandoned the technological growth and advancement (fabric covered biplanes to 747s) that was provided by such protection. The ensuing years of yo-yo growth and contraction consumed many pilot's entire careers as the industry sought to find out how much air travel the public needed and at what price.
When internet ticket distribution came along, all that was learned by the first phase of deregulation was thrown out the window as airlines intensely competed on price where buyers had access to all fares listed lowest to highest. Now the price was set by the strongest airlines and the weaker ones completely neglected what their costs were, figuring they could become more competitive through labor concessions or bankruptcy or both.
The regional market did it by lowering hiring standards betting on a combination of overtaxed ATC to keep pilots on the ground and out of harms way and the reliability of modern equipment to keep the demand for the kind of skills experience brings to be unnecessary. The government recently closed that gambling table.
So I don't begrudge Alfred Kahn, but like ObamaCare it was frought with unintended consequences that overshadow most of the positive intentions.
And you sir made your mark at one of those coming from dergulation in desert heat. Never got to one of those better jobs did you?