ferlo
mohammed is the BOMB!!!!
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2002
- Posts
- 539
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are not exactly "replacing" the 10 -200s with only 5 -400s. They are only retrofitting 5 -400s for a combi configuration. Other flying will be taken up by 4/7/9s without the combi config. No jobs have "vanished" due to this conversion of the fleet. In fact, there will be new hires before the end of the year, and the CEO is standing by his goal of growing the company by 6.5% in 2005 (or so he still recently claimed). I think you are unduly alarmed. Are you an Alaska pilot? If so, maybe you could share more of exactly what has you concerned. I may be missing something, since we are typically only shown the lower right hand corner of the big picture...ferlo said:Are any other alaska pilots concerned by the fact that they are parking 10 200's and only replacing them with 5? I know they are notorious hanger queens but at about 5+ crews per aircraft multiplied by 5 aircraft, that's a lot of jobs that just vanished. I'm a little concerned.
We don't have 10 200's on the property anyway.ferlo said:FLX,
Yes I'm an Alaska pilot. I guess I'll hold my final opinion about this until I see what aircraft, or how many I should say are going to be delivered to fill in the the retrofitted aircraft. The bottom line is 5 aircraft are leaving, and thus far and not scheduled to be replaced. Seats are jobs. It does us no good as a pilot group if the slack is drawn up by larger airplanes. 10 seats are 10 seats. I'm not worried about a furlough, or anything drastic like that but I hate to see the fleet shrink even slightly.
av8instyle,av8instyle said:We don't have 10 200's on the property anyway.
Hate to break this to you, but it was an accepted PROCEDURE, not some rogue pilot's "TECHNIQUE", on the -200s at MarkAir. It surely wasn't prohibited.flx757 said:At the two companies which I worked where we flew the gravel equipped -200s, this was a strictly prohibited procedure. Sure, there were guys that used that "techinique" because they got themselves into a bind...but no one "bought off on it". In fact, it was rare to "get away with it", and most wound up paying some sort of price.
inline said:Hate to break this to you, but it was an accepted PROCEDURE, not some rogue pilot's "TECHNIQUE", on the -200s at MarkAir. QUOTE]
'Nuff said....
(BTW...I thought that's all there were at MarkAir..."rogue pilots"... )