Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed, although I think the unpleasantness will die down fairly quickly (within a year or two) as long as nobody gets hosed TOO badly in the integration.Seriously, it'll be expensive, more complicated than it's being given credit for and we'll have to integrate something like thirty seven airplanes worth of employees for a net gain of 25 airplanes. That is a recipe for a lot of unhappy people on both sides and that will make AAI a less pleasant place to be.
Thanks, and yeah, we do. That's why I've NEVER said anything but relative integration with fences is appropriate. We should not even THINK about stapling or anything else just as rude.I sympathize for the AAI FOs who will have their upgrade time lengthened, but if we're going to buy Midwest, we need to bring their people on board and treat them right from day one.
Well-said. I don't think they're in any danger of not existing 5, 7, or 10 years from now, although I doubt their potential for any real growth (Hoeksema's smoke and mirrors about new aircraft orders for half a decade now). Definitely not a "lucky to have jobs" situation...Remember, it was our management's idea to buy Midwest, through no fault of the employees of Midwest Airlines. Nobody at AAI can look into a crystal ball and declare that "Midwest was going out of business anyway so they're lucky to have jobs". It shouldn't work that way. If the deal goes through we should respect what Midwest is bringing to the table, ie, 25(ish) 717s, gates and slots at DCA, LGA and operations at MKE and MCI.
IF this happens, I would REALLY like to see something done that's mutually agreeable to the Midwest pilots and be the FIRST acquisition/merger that actually has the "majority" of the pilots peaceably resigned, if not outright thrilled.Since I don't think that this industry has demonstrated (in recent acquistions) that level of mutal respect and unionism among employees, I'm afraid that any integration would be unfair to the airline being acquired and the seeds of discontent would be sown.
Yep. But then again, I've never been an airline CEO, so I guess the answer to why we're doing it this way is above my pay grade.I think it would be more beneficial to the existing employees of AAI and more cost effective to grow in-house than to acquire another carrier which will inevitably mean reduntant infrastructure stagnation and the probable downsizing of certain departments.
Works for me,,, just as close as ATL and cooler places to hang out on reserve. Can anyone say "Rick's Boatyard"?And if we're looking for a place to grow independently, Indianapolis sounds like a great place to start...but TV9 would probably prefer STL.
I'll see you out on the deck...Works for me,,, just as close as ATL and cooler places to hang out on reserve. Can anyone say "Rick's Boatyard"?![]()
Citation.. Many investors have already told AAI that they plan on tindering thier shares. However, AAI doesn't have to divolge who and how many until the 16th, when the offer expires. In other words, not much will happen as far as tindering on the 16th, thats just the day AAI has to file with the SEC how many shares have been tindered. AAI will extend thier offer for another month at that point.. During the last offer, AAI said about 7% of the total shares had been tindered to AAI.. I'm gonna say on the 16th your gonna see 40%+ tindered to AAI. Possibly enough to get more than 50%...
That pretty much sums it up...
Seriously, it'll be expensive, more complicated than it's being given credit for and we'll have to integrate something like thirty seven airplanes worth of employees for a net gain of 25 airplanes. That is a recipe for a lot of unhappy people on both sides and that will make AAI a less pleasant place to be.
I sympathize for te AAI FOs who will have their upgrade time lengthened, but if we're going to buy Midwest, we need to bring their people on board and treat them right from day one.
Remember, it was our management's idea to buy Midwest, through no fault of the employees of Midwest Airlines. Nobody at AAI can look into a crystal ball and declare that "Midwest was going out of business anyway so they're lucky to have jobs". It shouldn't work that way. If the deal goes through we should respect what Midwest is bringing to the table, ie, 25(ish) 717s, gates and slots at DCA, LGA and operations at MKE and MCI.
Since I don't think that this industry has demonstrated (in recent acquistions) that level of mutal respect and unionism among employees, I'm afraid that any integration would be unfair to the airline being acquired and the seeds of discontent would be sown.
Actually, what I said was, that should pretty much DO it.Tinder, Tender, whatever........ Say what you want, but I was right.. I was suprised to see 57% though.. I figured it would be close to 50% just to make it interesting.. 57% though, as one Lear70 said "that should pretty much to it"....... Hey lear, you better follow up on those resumes...
watch out Great Lakes, you are next!!!!Heard from the CP this morning ...
Airtran will buy ZV in Fall 2007.
No you didnt!!!!!
The mighty beech spank all over the dash. Nothing worse then having to slow Vref 20 miles out because you had a dash in front of you.:beer:
I predict this thread is going to driff a bit.
I agree, we pilots of both airline should work together and deal with the on hand situation, after all we are all professionals.
Just curious because I haven't heard any suggestions from the Midex folks. What type of integration do you guys/gals feel would be fair to both Midex and AAI pilots?
Please be specific and remember it must be fair to all Midex and all AAI pilots.
I too, would like to see as many of us as possible pleased with the integration plan. I just don't know how this could happen.
Thanks.