Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airplane kingpins tell Airbus: Overhaul A350

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Rogue5

Adult Swim junkie
Joined
Jul 16, 2002
Posts
882
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2002896362_boeing29.html

Airplane kingpins tell Airbus: Overhaul A350

By Dominic Gates
Seattle Times aerospace reporter

ORLANDO, Fla. — Two of the world's most powerful airplane buyers yesterday said Airbus should completely rethink the plane it has proposed to compete against Boeing's strong-selling new 787.

Steven Udvar-Hazy, probably the most respected figure in the global business of buying and selling airplanes, predicted the current version of Airbus' A350 would sell poorly and leave Boeing to dominate the lucrative market for midsized wide-bodies.

He stunned a packed audience of some 700 aviation professionals here by calling on Airbus to scrap its existing A350 design and spend many additional billions on a brand-new airplane with a new fuselage and a new wing.

"That's probably an $8 billion to $10 billion decision. Airbus is at a crossroads," said Udvar-Hazy, founder, chairman and chief executive of the second-largest airplane-leasing company, Los Angeles-based International Lease Finance Corp.

Airbus had better make that decision before the Farnborough Air Show in England in July, he said.

His remarks were endorsed by Henry Hubschman, president of the world's No. 1 lessor of airplanes. In an interview, he said he "completely" agreed with Udvar-Hazy's message.

If Airbus sticks with its current design, Udvar-Hazy said, it will wind up with as little as 25 percent market share against the 787.

Sitting in the audience was top Airbus sales executive John Leahy, who earlier had given a confident and rosy presentation of Airbus' competitive position.

In an interview afterward, Udvar-Hazy indicated some Airbus executives are contemplating the extreme step he advocates.

That would be an admission that Airbus' strategy is seriously flawed and needs a radical about-face.

"Airbus will have to deal with this issue or accept a silver medal instead of a gold," Udvar-Hazy said.

The leasing executive spoke at the annual conference of the International Society of Transport Aircraft Trading (ISTAT) at a resort outside Orlando.

He described the current version of the A350 as "a good solid, airplane" with "elements that are leftovers from the early members of the Airbus wide-body family."

The current A350 offering is based on the A330 jet but uses new engines and a lighter airframe, thanks to a composite-plastic wing and a fuselage made from aluminum/lithium alloy.

However, it has the same fuselage cross-section Airbus had 30 years ago, and the wing shape is unchanged.

Udvar-Hazy said Airbus should go for an all-new design to replace not only the current A330 twin-engine jets but also the larger four-engine A340s — "a new family of aircraft that will be the backbone of their wide-body midsize product line for the next 20 to 25 years."

Udvar-Hazy and Hubschman, president of GECAS, the aircraft-finance division of General Electric, lead organizations that are quite simply the rival plane makers' most powerful customers.

In the corridor after the conference session he shared with Udvar-Hazy, Hubschman said he thought that some action at Airbus should come within the next three months.

Udvar-Hazy said in the interview that as a leasing company attuned to an airplane as a long-term financial investment, "we want to have long-term residual value in the A350. ... We're not interested in a Band-aid reaction to the 787."

He said Airbus should develop a new family "that incorporates even more of the new technologies the 787 is doing." It should have a larger diameter fuselage to at least match the dimensions of the 787 interior, and a faster, more swept-back wing to give it the 787's speed.

That would be "a nightmare for Boeing," he said.

But for Airbus, it would be a big gamble. "It's going to cost a lot of money and it's going to cost delay," Udvar-Hazy said.

Analysts at the conference said such a move would delay the Airbus program by at least a year. The A350 is already 2-½ or three years behind the 787.

But Udvar-Hazy believes Airbus has little choice. If it doesn't, he said, Boeing will dominate the entire midsize wide-body segment of the market, with its 787 outselling the A350 and the 777 outgunning the A340.

He said sales of the superjumbo A380 — at best "300 or 400 airplanes," he estimated — cannot compensate for missing out in the much larger midsize wide-body market.

Last year, Boeing opened up a big gap in wide-body sales with big wins selling 787s and 777s to airlines including Air Canada, Korean Air, Qantas, Air India and Emirates.

"It's the marketplace that is going to dictate whether they do this or not do this," said Udvar-Hazy. "They have some big sales campaigns against Boeing. If they continue to lose, if Airbus loses two or three more critical campaigns, what choice do they have? They can't be out of this segment of the business.

"Otherwise, what happens to the A340? Do they make one a month or one every two months? Where is that headed, the whole A340 product line, after say 2008?"

Udvar-Hazy said time is not on Airbus' side because Airbus is already spending on the A350 program, and because airlines may get edgy with uncertainty and decide to go for the 787.

"That's a huge financial decision. It can't be delayed very long," said Udvar-Hazy. "If they are going to make a course correction, it's got to happen I think in the next four or five months."

"Time is an enemy," he said. "They've got to tell the market clearly."

By speaking publicly and in front of John Leahy, Udvar-Hazy is also trying to influence Airbus' decision.

"There are forces within Airbus that like the current approach; it's the lowest investment and lowest risk," he said. "And then there are others that are perhaps more visionary. They're saying let's think this through very carefully. There are alternatives."

Outside, Leahy downplayed the impact of Udvar-Hazy's remarks and pointed out International Lease Finance Corp. has ordered the current version of the A350. "Actions speak louder than words," said Leahy.

Asked if a change of plan was in the works, he responded: "I don't see anything imminent at this juncture."

Udvar-Hazy said his company placed the A350 order because those planes will sell well enough in the short term if priced much less than the 787. It's the jet's long-term future he is concerned about.

Analysts at the conference were doubtful that Airbus can afford to could pull off a complete new aircraft program, even while it struggles to complete the A380 and the military cargo A400M airplane.

"They cannot drop everything and start from scratch," said Adam Pilarski, an analyst with Avitas.

Richard Aboulafia of the Teal Group said Udvar-Hazy was asking for "a massive turnaround, a total redirection of Airbus resources."

"No airplane company is good at admitting that everything is wrong and that their whole strategy is so flawed it needs a fundamental rethink," said Aboulafia. "That's tough."

Dominic Gates: 206-464-2963 or [email protected]
 
Interesting....I thought they already went back to the drawing board once with the A350. Judging by the (lack of) sales for the A350 vs. the 787 so far I'd say this gentleman from ILFC probably has a point. Too bad Airbus has totally commited their capital and intellectual resources to the A380 whalejet for the forseeable future and seemingly can only come up with this weak competing product to the 787. (When was the last time they got an order for the A380, anyways??)

I really like the position Boeing has put itself in with the 787, as well as the new 777 and 747-800 dirivatives it has out there to compete with Airbus.
 
It's not long before we see the 797.

If they can't sell A350's what do you think will happen to the A320 series?

Everyone compares the ERJ190 to the 737 and the 319. How the numbers look when it compares to the short version of the 797?
 
Last edited:
I bet the dorks over at airliners.net are collectively having heart attacks while at the same time knee-deep in spooge after reading that article.
 
G4G5 said:
It's not long before we see the 797.

If they can't sell A350's what do you think will happen to the A320 series?

Everyone compares the ERJ190 to the 737 and the 319. How the numbers look when compares to the short version of the 797?


I don't think it will affect the narrowbodies at all. Last time I looked there was a backlog of over 1600 orders for the 320 series. But I agree, the A350 may be in trouble. It looks like the 787 will be the class of the industry for many, many years.
 
:laugh:I Luv It!! Boeing is going to KILL Scarebus ONCE AGAIN!! The 777, 787 and 747-800 is going to almost put them under!! Bring it on BOEING!!
 
I believe Airbus got arrogant with the Worlds largest airliner and forgot that its the bottom line that wins in the end. Go Boeing!!
 
Tomct said:
:laugh:I Luv It!! Boeing is going to KILL Scarebus ONCE AGAIN!! The 777, 787 and 747-800 is going to almost put them under!! Bring it on BOEING!!

What's your beef with Airbus anyway? It looks like you don't fly a 'bus or a Boeing.
 
The A-350 was a poor decision from the beginning. You can't take an existing airframe, make it with exotic composites to make it lighter, and claim that "now we have a Dreamliner too".

Airbus' claims of efficiency are especially suspect when you consider the engines. The engines designed for the 787 are bleedless- all of the aircraft systems that have been pneumatic in the past will be electric now. Airbus intends to take those engines that were designed without bleed air and use them the same old way as before- killing any gains in efficiency.

The 787 has a huge jump on the A-350 too. Parts are already being made for the Dreamliner, while Airbus is looking at freezing the design of the A-350 in the next few months. Even if they press ahead with this A-330 redesign, customers would have to wait for 4-5 years longer than they would have to for an all-new 787. If Airbus has any hope of building an aircraft comparable to the 787, they will also start from scratch.

Things aren't going good for Airbus in general. Besides the A-350 situation, the numerous problems in the A-380 program are making some customers have second thoughts, especially since the 747-8 is now on the way (and is a tried and tested design that airports are already designed for).
Even Airbus' A-400 military airlifter is losing ground to Boeing. It's been delayed for so long that some countries (UK and Australia) are going with the C-17 because they're tired of waiting.

After a string of poor decisions concerning the needs of the market, it looks like Airbus might have at least three white elephants gathering dust on the showroom floor before too long.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top