Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airnet

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
CFO4Life, I guess I was referring to the 1800 RVR as posted by atldc9. Would this have an effect on the FAA's view of it? If the RVR is reporting 1800 but the pilot says he had 1/2 mile vis, who would prevail?

~wheelsup
 
USC328 said:
Of course Guillotine is good at spotting the approach lights. He has a keen eye for spotting airport lights and signage. :) (Inside joke) Just messing with ya guillotine. See ya in CMH.

USC328
I doubt he's going to find this funny...................
 
Of course Guillotine is good at spotting the approach lights. He has a keen eye for spotting airport lights and signage.
your death will be slow and painful....just kidding. my offroading took me back to my youth watching the dukes of hazard. i'm going to paint a confederate flag on the side of 36F.
 
Of course Guillotine is good at spotting the approach lights. He has a keen eye for spotting airport lights and signage. :) (Inside joke) Just messing with ya guillotine. See ya in CMH.

Thats a low blow!! By the way how is the off road performance of of that beast Guillotine?


---Lando
 
243 feet lando, didn't i tell you. the articulation of the landing gear leave a lot to be desired. nice total time by the way "< 1000" pretty vague there...why didn't you make it "< 500 " ?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom