Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airline costs and productivity charts

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Shouldn't you guys be comparing ASM's per employee? Seems a little more accurate when comparing different fleets......
 
Your right Muskycat...employees per aircraft mean nothing and it is a factor I bet no management team considers. Please excuse me for my previous post. It is probably all because of fuel hedging.
 
"The more destinations a company has, the more employees it takes. Pretty simple.."

Do you have 2 departures a day with 3 employees or do you have 23 departures with 6 employees? Do all the employees know how to operate or maintain each different type of plane that is parked at that gate?
 
"The more destinations a company has, the more employees it takes. Pretty simple.."

Do you have 2 departures a day with 3 employees or do you have 23 departures with 6 employees? Do all the employees know how to operate or maintain each different type of plane that is parked at that gate?

How about if brand x services 85 cities and brand Y services 400 cities. And each city has on average 10 employees.
 
I don't know why anyone would consider employees per airframe and why some financial wizards would graph it. Just count the number of stations. Clear as a bell now. Thank you.


Because airframes make money and employees take money. The ratio between the two can be telling, especially with bloated mgmt layers and union largess.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top