Typhoon1244
Member in Good Standing
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2002
- Posts
- 3,078
I know of a Part 121 carrier that has an attendance policy that seems...well, a bit harsh. The policy is that if you accumulate six absences in twelve months, you receive a three-day suspension. Seven absences in twelve months means termination. The catch is that this rule applies to documented excused absences (eg. doctor records, etc.) as well as "no-shows."
Now I realize there are people out there who call in sick so they wont miss that Jimmy Buffett concert, or they suddenly get the flu if their commute isn't working out that day. Therefore that airlines have to make it clear that absenteeism is serious.
But what if you were legitimately sick those six times? I realize that you're no good to the company if you miss to much work, but there shouldn't there be some compensation for the fact that, sometimes, sh|t happens?
Is this pretty common among major and large-regional airlines? Or is the policy I've described somewhat unique?
(See, I've got this friend...)
Now I realize there are people out there who call in sick so they wont miss that Jimmy Buffett concert, or they suddenly get the flu if their commute isn't working out that day. Therefore that airlines have to make it clear that absenteeism is serious.
But what if you were legitimately sick those six times? I realize that you're no good to the company if you miss to much work, but there shouldn't there be some compensation for the fact that, sometimes, sh|t happens?
Is this pretty common among major and large-regional airlines? Or is the policy I've described somewhat unique?
(See, I've got this friend...)