Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Aircraft assignmens at Netjets

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Hey (X402) If you have "xyz" amount of time in a hawker 700, they are NOT going to put you in a Citation ultra.

I'm not going to argue your experience, obviously it worked out for you. However, there is no policy that I know of that will allow you to get into the fleet you desire. Timing is everything, as they say, and I'm glad it worked out for you. I guess the lesson is 'It can't hurt to ask,' but I still wouldn't bet the Company is going to do the right thing by new hires across the board. They sure don't do the right thing by the people that already work here.

PS
I know plenty of guys with time in everything from Hawkers to 777's that have started in the Ultra.
 
sweptwingz said:
Heavy Set said:
When you say hardest working do you mean:

1. Most sectors per day
2. Least amount of rest time - no good layovers
3. Most hours in the air per day
4. Likely to be flying nonstop throughout the tour (no breaks)
5. Types of flights flown (more transcon)

All of the above. I averaged 400-600 hours per YEAR in the Ultra, 4-6 legs per day was normal. I average 200-300 hours per year in the VII, a 3 leg day is normal. Stay out of the X, it is a "Roman Slave Ship" !!!! Coast to coast, and constant 14 hour duty, with minimal rest. It's simply TOO fast for it's own good. STAY OUT OF THE TEN.
Unless you break, expect a 10-12 hour overnight in most aircraft. QOL on the road is minimal. The bigger, faster, jets do more transcon, logically. They work you VERY hard here. Many ex-airline guys are shocked, and simply can't "hang".
IF and ONLY if released by the mediator for self help in June, COUNT on a solid (and VERY nasty) strike here, I would seriously consider that as a NJA wanna be.

I have heard from a couple of NJA X drivers the same - they are worked pretty hard. However, I know some guys who fly the Excel and they complain about being overworked too - sounds like most fleets are either understaffed or just plain busy. My feeling, if you are going to be overworked, you might as well either be comfortable or enjoy some nice performance - and the X can give you that (not the comfort factor) I am told by friends who fly it...

I guess the new regs have not helped too much in terms of rest time?
 
x402 said:
Hey (X402) If you have "xyz" amount of time in a hawker 700, they are NOT going to put you in a Citation ultra.

I'm not going to argue your experience, obviously it worked out for you. However, there is no policy that I know of that will allow you to get into the fleet you desire. Timing is everything, as they say, and I'm glad it worked out for you. I guess the lesson is 'It can't hurt to ask,' but I still wouldn't bet the Company is going to do the right thing by new hires across the board. They sure don't do the right thing by the people that already work here.

PS
I know plenty of guys with time in everything from Hawkers to 777's that have started in the Ultra.

When I hired on in '01 I had type ratings and considerable PIC time in the B-727, 757, and 767. I was offered my choice of the Ultra or Excel.
 
what about the hawker 400xp? Is it a junior airplane? Is it worked hard? Am I going to be stuck doing numerous short legs all day? I have a choice between the ultra and the 400xp and would like any info. about pros and cons. Thanks
 
lets see ultra vs the 400xp.

small vs smaller
no tcas vs tcas
singlept vs trunk fuel
no apu vs no apu
no xm vs xm

the list goes on and on
 
sarita you sound like a i am furloughed.

there are alot of ex blueridgers over here.
 
i'd rather have the ultra fms than the confusing pos that we have in the X.

i'd take the ultra because with the 400 your doing ultra trips with less fuel.

I've found tcas is overated. Ignorance is bliss.
 
sarita77 said:
what about the hawker 400xp? Is it a junior airplane? Is it worked hard? Am I going to be stuck doing numerous short legs all day? I have a choice between the ultra and the 400xp and would like any info. about pros and cons. Thanks

Not many Hawker 400's on the property yet so you probably won't work as much as the Ultra in the short term. Many Hawker 400 trips are being subbed to the Ultra. But with numerous deliveries on the way it'll get busy soon enough.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top