Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airbus Subsidies Illegal: WTO

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web


Well-known member
Nov 26, 2001
Airbus subsidies illegal: Ruling
Saturday September 5 2009
Press Association

The World Trade Organisation said Britain and other European countries gave billions to Airbus in illegal subsidies, in a trade dispute ruling that backed its rival, US aviation giant Boeing.

The preliminary ruling by the Geneva-based WTO, although expected to be challenged by the European Union, could begin to shake up the £2 trillion global market in new airliners, in which Airbus has overtaken Boeing.

But the next stage in the dispute will be a decision that may well go the other way. The international trade body will rule next year in an Airbus challenge to what it sees as unfair US government support for Boeing.
The decision confirmed a complaint by the United States, filed in 2004, that "all Airbus aircraft have received illegal subsidies and that these have caused material harm to Boeing", said Rep Norm Dicks, a Washington state Democrat among those briefed by US trade officials on the yet-to-be released decision.

Another Washington state Congressman, Democrat Jim McDermott, said: "We learned in a WTO ruling that Airbus has enjoyed an unfair competitive advantage over Team Boeing for decades."

But European officials who were briefed had a somewhat different take on the ruling from American politicians and officials, suggesting that many of the complaints lodged by the US had been dismissed. They also said the kind of easy-term loans provided by European governments to Airbus were in some instances seen as a permissible form of financing. A US official, speaking anonymously, said the report was clearly not in Airbus' favour and was a rebuke to decades of European government help.

The WTO finding was the first step in a process that could take years to produce a final result. The organisation does not have the power to impose sanctions itself, but it can allow a nation that has been harmed - in this case the US - to raise tariffs or impose other barriers to imports from an offending country or countries.

While this was a clear victory for the US, analysts suggested it reflected not the current world, in the grips of global recession, but the business world as it stood five years ago when open trade was the rule and anti-competitive, protectionist practices generally denounced. Since then, hundreds of billions have been spent in government subsidies and takeovers of failing banks and car makers in an effort to combat the worst global downturn since the Great Depression. And other countries, including China, Japan and Brazil, are busy expanding or developing their domestic airline industries.

The American case protested at "launch aid", easy-term loans that were extended primarily by France, Britain, Spain and Germany to help Airbus develop new jets as it overtook Boeing as the world's top producer of commercial planes. "The US has always maintained that the European governments have provided unfair subsidies to Airbus that harm US interests," said Deborah Mesloh, deputy assistant US trade representative in Washington.

However, the EU counter-case against the US -- with a ruling expected in about six months -- could find that America was also engaging in illegal trade practices in helping Boeing, including contracts awarded by the Pentagon and Nasa.

Copyright (c) Press Association Ltd. 2009, All Rights Reserved.
WTO ruling carry all the weight of "I Fart in Your General Direction."

-Boeing should win, but WTO don't mean crap.
Everyone knew they were getting help. Here is a question..... IF Boeing receives tax incentives isnt it the same thing really ? Virtually every corporation in the US gets a a local or state tax shelter.
Tax incentives and military contracts are not the same as direct cash the EU infuses to Airbus.

Latest resources