Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Age Limit P-91 ICAO

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
the reason why I ask is because ICAO Strickley talkes about age limit 65 for PIC under commercial rules. Anyone who has traveled internationaly knows that other Countries do not distinqish between 91 and 135. They believe all flying is under "135" and that there is no such thing as 91 for jets.
 
Unfortunately, from what I have been told it does. If you are corporate you are flying someone for compensation so it is like being part 135 or anything else. Now this may be bogus, but that is what I have been led to believe. 65 is the number as PIC..
 
the reason why I ask is because ICAO Strickley talkes about age limit 65 for PIC under commercial rules. Anyone who has traveled internationaly knows that other Countries do not distinqish between 91 and 135. They believe all flying is under "135" and that there is no such thing as 91 for jets.

Not sure where come up with that concept but I can assure you that there are numerous operators under the Part 91 umbrella that have PIC crewmembers that are over age 65. As I write this reply I have in mind two pilots who have been operating in and out of LFMN for years now and they are over 65. No big deal and completely legal. The authorities do in fact distinguish between Part 9, 121, 125 and 135.
 
I can think of numerous cases were a pilot was flying under a class 2 medical and the EU had a problem with it even though it was P-91
 
Unfortunately, from what I have been told it does. If you are corporate you are flying someone for compensation so it is like being part 135 or anything else. Now this may be bogus, but that is what I have been led to believe. 65 is the number as PIC..

Your right...it's bogus, now get over it.

PS, I'm well under 65
 
I can think of numerous cases were a pilot was flying under a class 2 medical and the EU had a problem with it even though it was P-91

Who said anything about Class 2 medicals? Any operation worth it's salt requires a 1st Calss medical regardless.
 
I can think of numerous cases were a pilot was flying under a class 2 medical and the EU had a problem with it even though it was P-91

Who said anything about Class 2 medicals? Any operation worth it's salt requires a 1st Class medical regardless.
 
Who said anything about Class 2 medicals? Any operation worth it's salt requires a 1st Class medical regardless.
I am just stating the fact that other countries see commercial flying different. And for any operation worth salt: there are many times I let my first class slip ( p-91 Domestic)a month and never thought about the problem with it internationaly until I heard from a buddy of mine that it happen to.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top