bagasticks
fist fornicator
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2006
- Posts
- 190
I see we have met the 'flight info section" of the aerobatic community. You guys probably couldn't compete your way out of a paper bag but could definately take first place in sitting on the ground and arguing over how to "say things right".
Only here would people take a thread like this about one of the best parts of flying (which a majority of the people on this site haven't ever experienced)and start bickering about how to say it. What, have you guys sat in the back seat of a citabria and watched someone roll it once? And now you're all experts on Acro-Aero-Flippo-Rollo?
This is starting to sound like a part 141 oral on acro given by a dude with 5 hours in a decathlon.
Perhaps we can start another thread about people who say Christian Eagle instead of Christen Eagle. Or WAY-co instead of WAH-co. Or Pitot instead of PI-toe tube.
I thought perhaps this would go in the direction of watching people do some sharp stuff in airplanes we never imagined would be on the airshow circuit.
Or maybe how yes, Luscombes and Cubs and Taylorcrafts can be aerobated in the Standard category, but unless you watched the plane being restored first hand, and can be sure that luscombe doesn't have nasty surprises tucked deep within the metal you can't ever inspect, perhaps you should just leave the old gals to an easy life in retirement. Especially if you can't garuntee you won't screw up a simple loop or roll. (or get some good instruction)
(sorry to be annoyed, I just thought if anywhere on this site the Aerobat section would be free of the whiny spillout from the regionals section. I guess not!)
Amen. . . . .
Men-n-Tights:
save the "proper english" lesson for the proper english, which I am not and neither are you. I am one of the idiots that clicked on this thread thinking some non-smart ass might actually answer the man's question as it struck my curiousity.