BluDevAv8r said:
This first group is just a start...and will get the ball rolling. I imagine the other small jet carriers will be involved downstream, and perhaps even some non-ALPA carriers in the form of a "coalition." Who knows at this point and time will tell. But if some of the negative folks on here really think it is too late, then maybe I should quit...
-Neal
Good luck Neal, your going to need it. Here is some background info. that you can bring up when you meet in Herndon.
1. The first "scope committee" formed in 1995. There were members from the ASA and CMR MECs among others and presentations from many pilots including ahemm.... Dan Ford ( a full 6 years before the RJDC lawsuit). Nothing was accomplished with this committee.
2. The most recent BSIC, formed some 6 years later, was chaired by TW. When I asked him about the first scope committee report, he responded with "I haven't read it".
3. Why did ALPA remove the term "alter-ego" from it's policy and procedures soon after Delta purchased ASA and CMR?
4. Why does ALPA promote scope language that actually increases the number of portfolio players? Freedom, G0jet$, and Republic were all formed to get around seat limits and thus created even more portfolio players. Even the new NWA scope language MANDATED that new Airlink flying go to someone OTHER than Mesaba and PCL.
5. Why did ALPA oppose the ASA/CMR PID in 2000?
Again, good luck. You follow in a long history of scope committees, BSICs, and brand scope rhetoric. It is a difficult problem, but the problem gets more difficult every day it is allowed to continue. At some point, we will be past the point of no return, and I believe that point is near if not already past.