GogglesPisano
Pawn, in game of life
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2003
- Posts
- 3,939
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, it beats landing long and parking in a gas station...canyonblue737 said:there are numerous pictures on airliners.net of heavies landing before the displaced threshold there. not good.
RP 04 said:Well, it beats landing long and parking in a gas station...
WOW! Is that like 100 worse than a 609 ride???ReportCanoa said:TOUCHDOWN IN THE CHEVRONS, NICE. Do that in the US and get fired plus a 709 ride. Can you imagine?
Dude, we're hitting gas stations! [just kidding :nuts: ]RP 04 said:Well, it beats landing long and parking in a gas station...
XR650R said:WOW! Is that like 100 worse than a 609 ride???
peter185 said:How long is the runway? It seems like departing there heavy weight would be a major problem if you have to land like that to get it stopped in time.
Aerosurfer said:the Runway is 7070 ft. Water on the other end and mountains across the bay too. Its not THAT short, but some pucker factor. Its mostly for show.....why.....because we can!!! First IOE Flight on the ATR was to there...never forget it!!!!
Tejas-Jet said:Actually....never did come on to the gas station property...
Tejas
floatflyer99 said:Interestingly, it may be permissible to land before a displaced threshold where this picture was taken. I know that in Canada, it depends on the underlying reason for the displaced threshold. If it's just for obstacle clearance and marked with white arrows, you can land
Aerosurfer said:the Runway is 7070 ft. Water on the other end and mountains across the bay too. Its not THAT short, but some pucker factor. Its mostly for show.....why.....because we can!!! First IOE Flight on the ATR was to there...never forget it!!!!
embpic1 said:I just did a takeoff performance calculation with our OPS software for this airport. It actually was better than I thought it would be. On a 20C day with calm winds and 29.92 inches, it showed a max t/o weight of 701,000 lbs with a Q-powered 747-200. This was with runway 27.
Spinn555 said:7000 feet in an ATR is pucker factor?
[FONT="]Ok. I tried it with a 30C day with a 5kt headwind on runway 9. It came up with 696,000. Still not too bad considering 833,000 is max structural t/o wt[/FONT]Aerosurfer said:Well add about 10 degrees onto that and you have a normal temperature and due to the tradewinds, 363.9999999999 days of the year there are winds out of the east, so RWY27 is out of the question.
Ohhhh... SMACK!AKAAB said:FYI - The 609 ride was renamed the 709 ride many years ago.
I wonder if it had anything to do with the tiltrotor's designation as a 609? It sure would sound odd to tell everyone you were taking a 609 ride when you were getting your tiltrotor rating.
Clip 208 has a real opening sequence to Hawaii 5-0 feel to it, very cool man.Airtran717 said:I have flown into St Maarten a few times in various aircraft and I can tell you that if I was going in there in a 747, that is right about where I would want to be when I come accross the threshold. What you dont see in that photo is how SHORT that runway really is and the mountain off the departure end.
Here are some VIDEOS of 747 landings on that same runway..
http://www.flightlevel350.com/viewer.php?id=765
http://www.flightlevel350.com/viewer.php?id=289
http://www.flightlevel350.com/viewer.php?id=211
http://www.flightlevel350.com/viewer.php?id=208
http://www.flightlevel350.com/viewer.php?id=2710