172 vs. Warrior for private pilot training

[kf4amu]

I like flying Cherokee 140's with the 160HP engine. By myself though...its small

 

[papanovember]

Yeah the 140 I flew had an 160 hp O320 climbed like a bat out of hell.

 

[flyer172r]

I've even caught a thermal in a 150 and climbed 1500ft with it, and you won't ever do that in any PA28...

So that's how you got it to climb on the way back from nationals.

I think it really comes down to what did you learn in first. That seems to determine which one you'll like better. I started out in 172s, did all my advanced stuff in various Pipers, but I still prefer the 172. I like having my own door, I like not having to worry about switching tanks. And I can never get the seat in a Warrior to go as high as I like, especially the right seat. Performance wise, I don't think there's a big enough difference to really make or break the deal. I've had the exact opposite experience as papanovember in terms of good/bad climb performance. My old flight school had one 172 that would struggle to get above 3000 ft. in summer time. The SPs are great though.

For your situation, I'd say take the 172 for solo since you're familiar with it. After that, go with whichever one is easier for you to schedule when you need it. Being able to fly regularly is (in my opinion) much more important than what airplane you fly. If you stick with the 172, make sure you fly the Warrior after you get your private, having experience in both will only make you better. Then you can chime in on the big debate.