Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

New Dogfight Between Obama and Private Jet Industry

  • Thread starter Thread starter gret
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 12

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

gret

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Posts
1,008
New Dogfight Between Obama and Private Jet Industry
WEALTH, MILLIONAIRES, BILLIONAIRES, INSIDE WEALTH: TAXES, BUSINESS NEWS
By:Robert Frank | CNBC Reporter & Editor
CNBC.com | Wednesday, 6 Feb 2013 | 1:52 PM ET

The president is taking aim again at private jets.

As part of the debt talks with Congress aimed at closing tax loopholes, Barack Obama is calling again for eliminating what he calls "tax breaks for private jet owners." The message recalls Obama's 2011 crusade in which he told Americans, "I think it's only fair to ask an oil company or a corporate jet owner that's doing so well to give up that tax break. I don't think that's real radical."

The private jet industry disagrees. In a statement, the National Business Aviation Administration said the industry employs 1.2 million Americans and generates $150 billion in economic activity. Closing the loophole, they said, would "not yield meaningful progress" in the debt efforts.

The tax break Obama is targeting relates to the accelerated depreciation of jets used for business purposes. Current tax law allows companies to write off the cost of their planes over five years, rather than the seven years allowed for charter and commercial planes.

"The White House's rhetoric about general aviation depreciation ignores established facts and long-standing tax policies related to business airplane ownership and use, does almost nothing to seriously address the nation's debt, and has the potential to harm a great American industry in the process," NBAA President Ed Bolen said in a statement.

The NBAA added that the private-jet business is still struggling after the crisis and could take "several years" to recover.

Studies show that closing the loophole would only generate about $3 billion over 10 years.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called the corporate-jet proposal "a cheap stunt and it certainly won't shrink the deficit or increase jobs." Others point out that Obama is attacking private-jet owners while himself enjoying the ultimate private jet – Air Force One.
© 2013 CNBC.com

URL: http://www.cnbc.com/100439712
 
Obama won't be happy until we're all riding bicycles. Except for him of course, he can still use his sweet private 747.
 
Your NBAA dues hard at work.

Congressional taxation and economic studies show that bonus and depreciation benefits do not impact a buyer’s decision. (If you want the study, I will post it but I read on November 17th and I have to find it again.)

Pick another fight…you’re fighting windmills…you’re dating Lennay Kekua…you don’t know what you are doing!
 
Your NBAA dues hard at work.

Congressional taxation and economic studies show that bonus and depreciation benefits do not impact a buyer’s decision. (If you want the study, I will post it but I read on November 17th and I have to find it again.)

Pick another fight…you’re fighting windmills…you’re dating Lennay Kekua…you don’t know what you are doing!

It sucks that the NBAA is being forced to do this. It absolutely impacts the decision to buy or not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Your NBAA dues hard at work.

Congressional taxation and economic studies show that bonus and depreciation benefits do not impact a buyer’s decision. (If you want the study, I will post it but I read on November 17th and I have to find it again.)

Pick another fight…you’re fighting windmills…you’re dating Lennay Kekua…you don’t know what you are doing!

post it.
 
Your NBAA dues hard at work.

Congressional taxation and economic studies show that bonus and depreciation benefits do not impact a buyer’s decision. (If you want the study, I will post it but I read on November 17th and I have to find it again.)

Pick another fight…you’re fighting windmills…you’re dating Lennay Kekua…you don’t know what you are doing!

Congress said the same things when it voted to impose a luxury tax on yachts. It almost killed the industry, and Congress quietly repealed the tax.
 
Ineffectiveness of Bonus Depreciation to Stimulate Economic Growth

CRS Report for Congress (discussion starts on page 10)

http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/crs/RL31852.pdf

Bonus Depreciation Tax Cut Unlikely To Provide Effective Economic Stimulus

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=579
I think the NBAA has a better feel of what stimulates a buyers decision to purchase an aircraft not some bureaucrats in Washington. I thought they learned their lesson with the luxury tax.
 
In most cases people and business who have decided to take the plunge and expense of private aviation will do so regardless of whether the jet can be written off in 5 or 7 years. It is like large charitable donations -- when someone donated $10MM for a new wing to a hospital or college, they do it for chartitable reasons -- the tax deduction is secondary.

In some cases accelerated depreciation may accelerate the purchase of a replacement aircraft. Also, the accelerated depreciation is most often used by private companies, not the Fortune 100 types that have the largest flight departments -- depreciation is an expense which trickles down to reducing net income and earnings per share, so for many public companies spreading out the depreciation is favorable. On the other hand, private companies are more concerned with reducing taxable income and will be in favor of the quickest depreciation schedule.

Don't get me wrong -- it is very, very nice to have accelerated depreciation as a private company. But the vast majorityu of them would still utilize private aviation regardless of whether the write off was 5, 7 or 10 years.
 
I think the NBAA has a better feel of what stimulates a buyers decision to purchase an aircraft not some bureaucrats in Washington. I thought they learned their lesson with the luxury tax.

Wish this was true, but if you look at the leadership of the NBAA and the immediate past president at NATA, both were/are long time Washington bureaucrats. New president at NATA has a practical background flying for Delta I believe.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom