AAflyer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 1,493
Gentlemen,
In my opinion this is a shot at taking one of the big items off the list in the Sect 6 negotiations, productivity. They are trying to do this under the guise of concern for potential furloughs.
The company has "targeted" 200. Why in the world would they target 200, allow 200 to retire, and then request flexing from 82-87 hours a month (with exceptions as high as 95 hours) if we were fat on pilots.
There is a huge potential second group pilots that are leaving Aug1-Sept 1. This WILL cause manning issues, it also puts the total number of AA pilots below the "commuter clause" threshold.
This is a straight grab at seeking relief for the commuter floor, and seeking productivity gives to help staff the airline that IS understaffed, and WILL continue to be understaffed.
IMHO,
AAflyer
TC. Nice to have met you the other day at the puzzle palace,
In my opinion this is a shot at taking one of the big items off the list in the Sect 6 negotiations, productivity. They are trying to do this under the guise of concern for potential furloughs.
The company has "targeted" 200. Why in the world would they target 200, allow 200 to retire, and then request flexing from 82-87 hours a month (with exceptions as high as 95 hours) if we were fat on pilots.
There is a huge potential second group pilots that are leaving Aug1-Sept 1. This WILL cause manning issues, it also puts the total number of AA pilots below the "commuter clause" threshold.
This is a straight grab at seeking relief for the commuter floor, and seeking productivity gives to help staff the airline that IS understaffed, and WILL continue to be understaffed.
IMHO,
AAflyer
TC. Nice to have met you the other day at the puzzle palace,