ACL65PILOT
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2006
- Posts
- 4,621
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is a lot of digging that you can do, but it does look like the larger numbers that were brought up here a few months ago by myself and a few others are proving true.
At 16-19 crews per airframe this is indeed good news for us.
This is great news. Thats well over 1000 pilots beyond what has been discussed with potential 737/MD90 airframes over the next seven years.
Im not so sure we are getting the -90s. The rumor mil in the tng dept is no. China Eastern has a crew going thru tng now..maybe we should go ask?
Apparently we have options for over 60 737's. I'm not a huge fan of the MD anyway. If I had my druthers Delta would increase the deliveries of the 777's and 737's (757's are hard to find) until the next generation 737 replacement rolls around towards the end of the decade following this one. Also start filling the 100 seat position with something like the Bombardier geared fan jet in five years. Regionals should be swapping rj's for large turboprops by then.... fingers crossed.
Delta inks deal with Boeing on March 20th to purchase additional 777LR's bringing total to 45 by 2015. I don't have any info on delivery shedule.
Yeah but our MDs and those Mds are CHEAP.
Funny how things come full circle. In the late 90s the airlines were running from props...because they were slower and people were afraid. I cant tell you how many times people whined about the ATRs...its like they thought it was a frickin DC3 from 1944?!!?! They see a prop and freak.
Now that fuel is the issue....those ATRs and Q400s are perfect. Well, perfect-er.![]()
At 16-19 crews per airframe this is indeed good news for us.
I think the ATR and the -8 are preferable to the RJ's. Personally, I prefer the increase in cabin size and the headroom, I find the RJ's excruciatingly cramped.
Flew on a Saab 2000 in EU, what a nice ride that was, shame it caught the end of the turboprops, since it was fast and comfortable.
Besides, the savings in time vs an RJ is small, particularily if the RJ is used as intended, on short routes. Spending 3 1/2 hours on an RJ seems like an eternity.
Yeah...no...it is 16-19 CREWS per 777. Well at least according to the VP of Flight Ops.I think its 28 pilots per 777 airframe....not to nitpick..see below....
Well, here is yesterdays message and it does state 6 more aircraft. But where is the mystical 45 number come from??? Not Boeing, Not Delta, Not Yahoo, so where???
Is that 6 total additional deliveries this year, or 6 more triples? I thought between more triples, 737NG's and used 757's that the total delivery additions would exceed 6 for the rest of the year?
Typical GL response...how did I know?..45 777LRs total by 2015? Isn't that when the first 787 will take flight? 2015?
Bye Bye--General Lee
There is a lot of digging that you can do, but it does look like the larger numbers that were brought up here a few months ago by myself and a few others are proving true.
At 16-19 crews per airframe this is indeed good news for us.
ACL, thank you for your post.I would assume that it could be a way to pressure NWA to a deal,....
ACL, thank you for your post.
I would disagree that this pressures NWA in any way. Management had already agreed on the stock swap & business successorship plans. The NWA pilots do not believe anything from any source - so they can not look far enough down the road to see the threat.
The 777LR makes Narita a "nice to have" and not a necessity as Delta simply flys over their hub with more efficient aircraft and better service.
Delta can win in the market.
Time for Delta to kick some NWA a$$ in the Pacific. Of course, it might take some time to get some bilateral rights and slots... Whatever happened to the Pacific routes flown out of PDX on the MD11?
John Q, you make excellent points. You are right about NWA's network and revenue folks. But, I do not see how this pressures NWA management in any way. For one thing, we will likely share code as we do now.
Delta has a lot of Pacific route authority unused that they got with Pan Am.
Delta can get new hires with good attitudes without longevity, or pay more for DTW and his pals while getting a obsolete, inefficient and disparate fleet. It is less expensive to grow internally.