120% Torque
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2002
- Posts
- 277
SAPA MEETING MINUTES
March 20-21, 2003
Los Angeles, California
PRESENTATION: Dave Benjamin presented his SAPA Legal Plan outline as follows:
Why Do We Need To Offer A Legal Plan?
Got to give credit to Dave Benjamin for putting together a compelling presentation for this legal plan. Unfortunately, it seems most of the Sapa reps seem to want to sabotage it and muddy the waters with speculative conjecture. Why do they resist something like this that makes so much sense? I believe once again it comes down to a control and accountability issue.
March 20-21, 2003
Los Angeles, California
PRESENTATION: Dave Benjamin presented his SAPA Legal Plan outline as follows:
Why Do We Need To Offer A Legal Plan?
- A typical enforcement action can cost upwards of $15K
- Overzealous FAA personnel pursue unwarranted cases
- TSA has ominous powers that exceed those of FAA
- Lawyer may be needed to deal with Aeromedical Branch
- SkyWest Pilots have expressed interest in legal protection
- $2.00/week, less than what we spend on a Starbucks coffee. Estimate based on 2/3 pilot participation
- Rusty is one of the top aviation attorneys in the US
- Rusty has flown the line as a pilot for PSA and US Air
- 15 years of legal experience
- 5 years of experience chairing grievance committee
- Handled 100's of grievances and recovered $30M +
- NMB hired Rusty to design a Mediation Training Program
- Successful mediation experience at Airborne Express
- Recently assisted Southwest pilots with interim contract
- Representation for FAA enforcement proceedings
- Representation for NTSB appeals and hearings
- Representation for Medical Certificate actions
- Representation company disciplinary measures
- We may be able to have Rusty considered a party to investigation
- We are looking into supporting the proposed SP 325 in this manner. We can probably establish a similar retainer to fund 50% of third party arbitration to facilitate the new SP 325.
Got to give credit to Dave Benjamin for putting together a compelling presentation for this legal plan. Unfortunately, it seems most of the Sapa reps seem to want to sabotage it and muddy the waters with speculative conjecture. Why do they resist something like this that makes so much sense? I believe once again it comes down to a control and accountability issue.