Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

US/DL articles for Xanderman and Gotafly--Senate Hearings

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

General Lee

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Posts
20,442
AP
US Airways Offer to Buy Delta Questioned
Wednesday January 24, 4:36 pm ET
By Alan Zibel Senators Voice Fears of Service Cutbacks Regarding US Airways' Offer to Buy Delta
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The chief executive of US Airways Group Inc. faced tough questioning at a Senate hearing Wednesday as lawmakers fretted that his company's proposed hostile takeover of Delta Air Lines Inc. would harm consumers, particularly those in rural areas.


Doug Parker, chief executive of Tempe, Ariz.-based US Airways, argued that the nearly $10 billion acquisition of Atlanta-based Delta would result in an efficiently run carrier that could offer low fares to fliers. He urged lawmakers to "let the market work."
Several senators said their constituents are concerned that a merger would result in cutbacks to service in small communities, where the per-unit costs of running an airline tend to be more expensive than in big cities with lots of passenger traffic.
"You're an aggressive suitor, but the lady from the South doesn't want to be forced into this shotgun wedding," said Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss, a reference to Delta's Atlanta headquarters.
On Jan. 10, US Airways increased its bid for Delta by nearly 20 percent, but Delta's CEO remains cool to the offer.
Delta's official committee of unsecured creditors, which will play a key role in deciding whether any merger agreement would move forward, has not issued a statement about its position since US Airways increased its offer.
"The surest, safest bet from the creditors' point of view is to go ahead with our stand-alone business plan," Delta Chief Executive Gerald Grinstein told reporters Wednesday.
Grinstein, in testimony before the committee, called US Airways' hostile bid "blatantly anticompetitive," and a "poster child of the worst kind of merger," estimating that 10,000 jobs would likely be eliminated. Parker disputed that figure, saying any job losses would be gradual and through attrition, rather than layoffs.
Despite his opposition to US Airways' offer, Grinstein said in a newsletter sent to employees Tuesday that a merger can't be ruled out for Delta after it exits bankruptcy. Grinstein also said Delta is "not negotiating" a merger with Northwest Airlines, denying reports in the Wall Street Journal.
US Airways shares rose 8 cents to close at $53.35 on the New York Stock Exchange.
Parker, who led America West Airlines' 2005 merger with US Airways, argued that the merger would lead to lower prices for consumers because the company would be in a better position to compete with low-cost carriers such as JetBlue Airways Corp. and Southwest Airlines Co. The growth of those competitors he said, shows the "tendency of the marketplace to respond."
"New carriers can come in and lower prices," Parker said.
Both airline executives said the industry has made important strides toward rebounding from the financial troubles that they incurred as result of the 2001 terrorist attacks and soaring fuel prices.
Delta is planning to come out of Chapter 11 bankruptcy by midyear as an independent company, and is planning for a Feb. 7 bankruptcy court hearing in New York to discuss the details of its bankruptcy exit plan. US Airways has said it will revoke its takeover bid if Delta's creditors do not postpone that hearing by Feb. 1.
More than 30 uniformed Delta pilots packed the Senate hearing room Tuesday to show their opposition to the merger, which they said would lead to job reductions.
"We are not against mergers, we are not against consolidation. What we are opposed to is this merger," said Robert L. "Buzz" Hazzard, a Delta pilot and spokesman for the Air Line Pilots Association International.





Delta Bonds Down As Merger, Buyout Appear Less Likely

DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
January 24, 2007 2:58 p.m.
By Cynthia Koons
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Delta Air Lines Inc. (DALRQ) bonds
fell Wednesday on mounting opposition to the US Airways
proposal to buy the bankrupt airline.

Delta's Chief Executive Gerald Grinstein told the Senate
Commerce Committee Wednesday that a merger between US
Airways Group Inc. (LCC) and Delta would likely trigger a
renewed spate of consolidation on the industry.

This news comes a day after The Wall Street Journal reported
US Airways' hostile bid was losing traction with Delta
creditors, which also drove Delta's bonds down.

Delta's 8.3% notes due 2029 lost 1.438 points on the day and
5.060 points on the week, to 64.5 cents on the dollar,
according to MarketAxess, an online bond trading platform.

"The merger fever seems to be subsiding in general, in the
last couple days," Roger King, a CreditSights analyst, said.
"It doesn't look like the US Airways bid is going to be
successful. It's hard to say how much discussion Delta and
Northwest had, but it doesn't sound like it's been much."

On Wednesday, Grinstein dismissed reports that Delta has
been talking to Northwest Airlines (NWACQ) about a possible
merger. Northwest's 10% notes due 2009 dropped 1.875 to
99.875 and its 9.875% issue due 2007 lost 1.25 to 101.5 in
active trade.

Grinstein said Delta recently retained an investment banker
to obtain information from Northwest at the behest of
Delta's creditors committee. But he said the move was just
part of what many carriers do to analyze and update
potential responses to the industry's changing marketplace.

Yet the bond activity was more of a reaction to the US
Airways news, said Raymond Neidl, an analyst at Calyon
Securities.

"I was one of the more skeptical analysts about this deal
from the beginning, for various reasons, one of the reason
being the regulators, so it's no surprise what's unfolding,"
he said of Grinstein's Senate testimony Wednesday. "This is
a small factor compared to the Delta's creditor committee if
they want to go ahead with this."

He said US Airways doesn't have much time to convince
creditors to approve the buyout, either, considering Delta
plans to emerge from bankruptcy by April.

As far as other bidders go, King said AMR Corp.'s (AMR)
American Airlines, Continental Airlines Inc. (CAL) and UAL
Corp.'s (UAUA) United have been quiet.

"There's not much news right now to support any merger
valuations," King said. "That's not to say something's not
going to happen, but things have definitely cooled off in
the near term here."




Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Last edited:
Here's another one guys.....

Airline CEOs Lock Horns
Over Industry Consolidation
By COREY BOLES
January 24, 2007 3:18 p.m.
WASHINGTON -- Chief executives at US Airways Group Inc. and
Delta Air Lines Inc. clashed Wednesday over what the impact
on the airline industry would be if US Airways were
successful in its hostile takeover bid for Delta.

Testifying before the Senate Commerce Committee, US Airways'
Doug Parker and Delta's Gerald Grinstein fundamentally
disagreed over the potential effect. In testimony submitted
in advance of the hearing into consolidation in the airline
industry, Mr. Grinstein warned that a successful US Airways
bid for Delta would trigger renewed consolidation in the
wider industry.

PLANE TALK

• US Air's Offer for Delta Loses Ground
01/23/07

• Northwest, Delta Discuss Tie-Up
01/11/07

• Delta Files Restructuring Plan
12/20/06

"A primary reason for Congress to examine the competitive
impact of this deal is that it will trigger broad industry
consolidation," he said. "Almost every day brings a new
media report on potential mergers in the airline industry,
most of which are stated openly as direct reaction to US
Airways' bid."

In his comments before the senators, Mr. Grinstein repeated
this message, saying that it would be inevitable that the
other major network carriers would be driven toward tie-ups.
"If you approve this deal, you are going to set such a low
barrier -- how are you going to object to future mergers,"
he said.

In his written testimony, Mr. Parker said a key reason for
its interest in Delta is that it is in bankruptcy
protection, which provides an opportunity to restructure and
lower its costs.

"Some critics cynically dismiss this merger as an attempt to
generate a windfall for US Airways' shareholders and
executives on the backs of the sacrifices made by Delta's
employees during the bankruptcy," Mr. Parker said. "Such
criticism misconstrues the philosophy that guides US
Airways' management team and the board of directors."

Mr. Parker was asked by Sen. Byron Dorgan (D., N.D.) whether
he would still be interested in Delta were the company not
in bankruptcy. Mr. Parker conceded that he likely would not
have embarked on the hostile takeover attempt if this were
the case.

Also testifying before the committee Wednesday was Mark
Cooper of the Consumer Federation of America, who in his
written testimony called on Congress and federal antitrust
officials "to stop the merger wave that is threatening to
engulf the airline industry."

US Airways has made two bids for Delta. The first was
rejected last year, while so far there has been no response
to the second, made two weeks ago and valued at about $10
billion. Because Delta is currently in bankruptcy-court
protection, its creditors would decide its future status
rather than its board. Delta's board has pledged to emerge
from bankruptcy protection later this year as an independent
entity.

During the hearing, Sen. Daniel Inouye (D., Hawaii), the
chairman of the Commerce Committee, asked Mr. Parker about
the possibility that a merger would lead to an immediate
reduction in staff numbers by 10%. US Airways made the 10%
figure public in the documents included in its initial
approach to Delta last year.

Mr. Parker responded that US Airways had no plans to
furlough any employees. Instead, he said that as employees
left of their own volition they wouldn't be replaced, and
job reductions would be realized that way. He said that was
the strategy employed when US Airways merged with America
West in September 2005.

Speaking to reporters during a break in the hearing, Lee
Moak, a Delta pilot and chairman of the airline's pilot
union, disputed Mr. Parker's claims that natural erosion
would achieve the reductions in staff numbers.

"These airlines have already gone through restructuring and
shed thousands of jobs," he said. "Those that are still
there are there for the long haul. It would take years to
achieve these job reductions through natural wastage."

Mr. Grinstein said that comparing the two mergers was a
"strange flight of fancy," because the situations were
entirely different. He said that in the case of the previous
merger there was very little overlap between the two
carriers, while Delta and US Airways are each other's
"biggest competitors."

Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D., W.V.) asked both executives
whether a merger would lead to the other four major carriers
-- Continental Airlines Inc., Northwest Airlines Corp., AMR
Corp.'s American Airlines and UAL Corp.'s United Airlines --
joining together. Mr. Grinstein responded that he thought it
would.

Several senators asked what the result of a merger on
service to rural communities would be. Many of the members
of the panel represent states that are largely rural --
Alaska, Hawaii, Minnesota and West Virginia -- and expressed
concern that consolidation in the industry would result in
these communities losing service.

US Airways' Mr. Parker said the best way to ensure
continuing service to rural communities was for there to be
strong network carriers, adding that the merger would
reinforce this.

At one stage in the hearing, Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D, N.J.)
was loudly applauded by the several dozen Delta pilots
present when he asked Mr. Parker why he didn't use financing
available for the deal to pay down the deficits in US
Airways' pension scheme. Mr. Parker said the money was
financing provided by investment banks and was contingent on
the Delta acquisition, rather than actually being on the
company's books.

The senate committee has no authority over whether or not to
approve any potential merger between the two companies. The
Department of Justice's antitrust unit has already indicated
that it would likely conduct an inquiry into the matter were
a merger to occur, and the Department of Transportation
would have some involvement as well.



Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Last edited:
General:
Step away from the computer for a little while. We both know that there are only a few tools at AWA! Posting this crap is only going to give yourself an anurism!
Besides, after hearing from Doogie on capitol hill today, he's even less bright then I origionally gave him credit for! My heart now feels for the poor souls at US Airways that have to work for this egotistical moron!

737
 
737,

I don't mind finding articles and posting them. I tend to give my opinions AFTER guys like Xanderman and Gotafly give their's.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Tool?

General:
Step away from the computer for a little while. We both know that there are only a few tools at AWA! Posting this crap is only going to give yourself an anurism!
Besides, after hearing from Doogie on capitol hill today, he's even less bright then I origionally gave him credit for! My heart now feels for the poor souls at US Airways that have to work for this egotistical moron!

737

Am I one of those tools? I just like to give GL a hard time! Especially now that he continues to speculate on every little bit of info that comes out. I speculated that if there was one thing that would turn off DP it would be the fact the CC wants a say in who occupies the board. He went and pissed himself! He was hacked at the fact that someone with a different idea posted something and then NEVER POSTED AN ARTICLE TO BACK IT UP!!!!!! For the record I do not want this and I believe it is becoming more and more unlikely. This is good for both of our pilot groups. But when I read GL's crap I gotta give him a hard time. None of us really knows what will happen but GL sure thinks he does! He even has articles to back up his articles. He refuses however to give me those winning lotto numbers. Selfish Bastidge! I know he can see into the future....
 
huh?

737,
I tend to give my opinions AFTER guys like Xanderman and Gotafly give their's.


Bye Bye--General Lee

Sorry Charlie!! You have that backwards!!! Do you realize how many pilots on this board have asked you to put down the crack pipe and step away from the website!!!! How many posts do you have??? You are killing me...:laugh: :D :laugh:
 
Am I one of those tools?
No Andy, the comment wasn't directed at you. The comment was directed at Doug Parker (on my ignore list), phxflyer, & hpilot.

I just like to give GL a hard time! Especially now that he continues to speculate on every little bit of info that comes out. I speculated that if there was one thing that would turn off DP it would be the fact the CC wants a say in who occupies the board. He went and pissed himself! He was hacked at the fact that someone with a different idea posted something and then NEVER POSTED AN ARTICLE TO BACK IT UP!!!!!! For the record I do not want this and I believe it is becoming more and more unlikely.
I completely agree. The way Doug was handed his ass by the senators today, I'm thinking less and less of him....And that old saying from top gun...."his ego is writing checks his body can't cash."

This is good for both of our pilot groups.
I sure hope you meant to say.....
This is NOT god for both our pilot groups.

But when I read GL's crap I gotta give him a hard time. None of us really knows what will happen but GL sure thinks he does! He even has articles to back up his articles. He refuses however to give me those winning lotto numbers. Selfish Bastidge! I know he can see into the future....
GL loves his company, just like you love yours. He's pretty harmless, just don't keep asking him to respond, or you'll help him get to his 10,000 mark that much quicker.
regards,
737
 
yeah...

Yeah I meant it to read that the deal falling apart is good for our respective pilot groups...

GL and 10000 posts now that is worthy of a news article;)
 
Besides, after hearing from Doogie on capitol hill today, he's even less bright then I origionally gave him credit for!

That was my impression too. Of course it's hard to be impressive when the Senators were so skeptical of his plan and grilled him on how he could eliminate 200 airframes, but still provide consumers with the same level of service, at less costs, without having to furlough any employees. To say that Parker had a credibility problem is to be generous.
 
Am I one of those tools? I just like to give GL a hard time! Especially now that he continues to speculate on every little bit of info that comes out. I speculated that if there was one thing that would turn off DP it would be the fact the CC wants a say in who occupies the board. He went and pissed himself! He was hacked at the fact that someone with a different idea posted something and then NEVER POSTED AN ARTICLE TO BACK IT UP!!!!!! For the record I do not want this and I believe it is becoming more and more unlikely. This is good for both of our pilot groups. But when I read GL's crap I gotta give him a hard time. None of us really knows what will happen but GL sure thinks he does! He even has articles to back up his articles. He refuses however to give me those winning lotto numbers. Selfish Bastidge! I know he can see into the future....

He seems to post articles and watch your reactions. You don't seem to be reacting well. General Lee is over the top often, but he really is entertaining.
 
That was my impression too. Of course it's hard to be impressive when the Senators were so skeptical of his plan and grilled him on how he could eliminate 200 airframes, but still provide consumers with the same level of service, at less costs, without having to furlough any employees. To say that Parker had a credibility problem is to be generous.

If you're curious to hear what this idiot sounds like check out his interview with ch 2 in ATL. He really is a clueless idiot! He contradicts himself so many times you can't count!

http://www.wsbtv.com/video/10836439/index.html

After listening to this, it makes you wonder how this moron ever made it to where he is today!

737
 
General:
Step away from the computer for a little while. We both know that there are only a few tools at AWA! Posting this crap is only going to give yourself an anurism!
Besides, after hearing from Doogie on capitol hill today, he's even less bright then I origionally gave him credit for! My heart now feels for the poor souls at US Airways that have to work for this egotistical moron!

737

Nice spelling there senior butt ranger.
 
He seems to post articles and watch your reactions. You don't seem to be reacting well. General Lee is over the top often, but he really is entertaining.

I am so glad that you think I am entertaining.....Hey, I just post articles and then debate people's opinions. That is really my game....


Bye Bye--General Lee
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom