Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airlines Stay in American Hands

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

FDJ2

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2003
Posts
3,908
[FONT=arial, helvetica]Transportation[/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica]Airlines to Stay in American Hands
[/FONT][FONT=arial, helvetica]By Ted Reed
TheStreet.com Staff Reporter
[/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica]12/5/2006 3:42 PM EST[/FONT]

[FONT=arial, helvetica]URL: http://www.thestreet.com/newsanalysis/transportation/10326087.html


The Bush administration, facing strong Congressional opposition, has withdrawn a controversial proposal to reduce barriers to foreign ownership of U.S. airlines, but says it remains committed to the concept.

"It was clear from reviewing the comments that the [Transportation Department] needs to do more to inform the public, labor groups and Congress about the benefits of allowing more international investment," said Transportation Secretary Mary Peters, in a prepared statement.

Peters said the proposal, issued in 2005 and amended in May, would have provided U.S. airlines with more access to the world's capital markets.

She also reaffirmed the U.S. commitment to completing an Open Skies aviation agreement with the European Union. Talks have stalled because the U.S. has been unable to offer reciprocal access to international investment.

Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of members of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee welcomed the withdrawal of the proposal, saying it had threatened both national security and American jobs.

Democratic Congressman James Oberstar of Minnesota, the likely new chairman of the committee, commended Peters in a prepared statement "for choosing to do the right thing, in the face of strong pressure within the administration and from the European Union."

Added Frank LoBiondo, R-N.J., "Today's announcement is an acknowledgement that the consensus opinion of Congress was heard."

Limiting foreign ownership of domestic airlines like United, American and Continental (CAL) has long been a tenet of U.S. aviation policy, but the steady creep of globalization is calling the restrictions into question.

In November 2005, the DOT said it wanted to alter its rules, changing the interpretation of a provision of the law that governs "actual control" of a U.S. airline. While foreign investors would still have been limited to 25% of the voting stock, the change would have allowed foreigners to have "actual control" of the carrier and to make management decisions.

However, in June, the House voted by a better than 2-to-1 margin to attach language to an appropriations bill prohibiting the immediate implementation of the rule.
[/FONT]
 
Damn, the hope of great service is gone, unless you calling getting some blue chips service.
 
Guess Branson wishes he hadn't invested in VA right now!!!:eek:
 
yeah so what's the immediate impact on Virgin America?? They already have planes doing tests and stuff.
 
Thank god the democrats got control or else Bush would have Fc#ked this one up as well... Maybe the light at the end of the tunnel isn't a train.
 
" However, in June, the House voted by a better than 2-to-1 margin to attach language to an appropriations bill prohibiting the immediate implementation of the rule. "


What I'd like to know is who voted against this one and in so doing voted to screw us! Liberalization of our airline industry is bad for us and it also makes America less secure. As far as Sir Richard is concerned this story tells us that he is in the US market to stay.

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/061204/nym061.html?.v=67

He's going to have Virgin expand into other US cities and then VirAm will get the pax to the next downline station. All while providing excellent service I'm sure. In regards to 08, Hillary here we come, yeah, she'll help us out, just like El Heffe Clinton did by passing NAFTA.

SL
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom