Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

DAL's focus & goals remain unchanged

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

FDJ2

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2003
Posts
3,908
Delta's focus and goals remain unchanged
November 15, 2006



Today, Delta unexpectedly received from US Airways an unsolicited letter proposing the merger of our two carriers as part of Delta’s emergence from bankruptcy. You have heard this news already since US Airways simultaneously made the letter public. Delta people have participated in the hard work and tough choices driving our company’s already remarkable restructuring progress. I know you care deeply about what this means for our airline.
Our goal is for Delta to exit bankruptcy in the first half of 2007 as an independent, stand-alone company – not as a merged, acquired, or otherwise consolidated airline. We are working hard to regain an industry position of strength and leadership. From that position, we can best control our own destiny and pursue the direction that best benefits all Delta constituents, including Delta people, now and in the future.
Delta is obligated to review this proposal carefully, and we will do so. We already had declined discussions when US Airways approached us earlier this fall. Obviously, others are recognizing the success we’ve achieved together by reducing costs, increasing revenue, and improving customer products and services, along with other significant progress. You have good reason to be proud of the positive response you’re helping our company earn.
The Bankruptcy Court has granted Delta management the exclusive right until February 15, 2007, to create our own plan of reorganization. During this “exclusivity” period, other parties are not allowed to submit competing plans. I’ve said before and continue to believe that the history of mergers in the airline industry is almost always one of failure with over-promise of synergies and under-delivery of results. That continues to be my view.
Now more than ever, your support and commitment are key to the goal we all share: Delta’s long-term success. Thank you for remaining focused on our operations and taking care of Delta customers and each other, especially in the busy Thanksgiving travel season ahead.
Jerry Grinstein
 
Well said J(G)erry.

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
That was alot of talk for saying we are along for the ride.
 
As long as Jerry get's his golden parachute $$$, I really don't think he cares if the merger goes through or not.

Show me the $$$!!! That's the first thing they teach you in business school.
 
As long as Jerry get's his golden parachute $$$, I really don't think he cares if the merger goes through or not.

Show me the $$$!!! That's the first thing they teach you in business school.

You should probably research J(G)erry's history and his net worth before you make that statement. He could give a damm what he gets paid.
 
"The Bankruptcy Court has granted Delta management the exclusive right until February 15, 2007, to create our own plan of reorganization. During this “exclusivity” period, other parties are not allowed to submit competing plans. I’ve said before and continue to believe that the history of mergers in the airline industry is almost always one of failure with over-promise of synergies and under-delivery of results. That continues to be my view."

Yes and that is how long you may go on thinking this won't fly...if you think the creditors won't buy this then you may continue"clicking your heels" and repeating "...there's no place like home...there's no place like home...."
 
You should probably research J(G)erry's history and his net worth before you make that statement. He could give a damm what he gets paid.

LOL

You think rich people don't give a dang what they are paid? HA HA HA...

How do you think they got rich in the first place. I have yet to meet a wealthy person that does not ALWAYS think of $$$.

He knows... He cares... He will get all the $$ he can regardless!
 
Yes and that is how long you may go on thinking this won't fly...if you think the creditors won't buy this then you may continue"clicking your heels" and repeating "...there's no place like home...there's no place like home...."

Easy big fella. As much as you'd like to see the demise of DL, the surviving name will be DELTA, much to your dissapointment. That's a big "IF" it even goes through!



Bankruptcy Court Can Be Tough
Venue for Hostile Takeovers
By MARIE BEAUDETTE and LAURA MCGANN
November 15, 2006 4:20 p.m.

US Airways Chief Executive Doug Parker faces a major handicap in his $8 billion bid to acquire unreceptive Delta Air Lines Inc.: Bankruptcy courts tend to be poor staging grounds for hostile takeovers.

Unless Delta's management can be persuaded to go along with the deal or its creditors stage a revolt in the bankruptcy court, US Airway's bid is a longshot, bankruptcy experts said Wednesday. Delta has exclusive control over its Chapter 11 case through at least early February, and bankruptcy courts seldom overrule management when things are going smoothly.

Mr. Parker "basically lobbed this Hail Mary pass up in the air to see who's going to catch it," said Fulbright & Jaworski partner William Rochelle. "To be able to have a prayer for success, he's got to be able to generate interest from creditors."

Mr. Rochelle, who represents secured creditors in airline bankruptcy cases, said Parker chose the "least offensive method" to persuade Delta to accept its proposal. Rebuffed by Delta's management, he decided to publicly court the carrier's unsecured creditors, who stand to gain a 45% stake in what would be one of the world's largest airlines.

But Mr. Parker, the America West chief who took the helm of US Airways when it merged with the Arizona-based carrier last fall, could be in for a bumpy ride as he attempts to take over a company protected by the bankruptcy court.

"If management is hostile to the US Airways proposal, US Airways may find it difficult to force its way into the room," said Reed Smith bankruptcy partner Eric Schaffer, who worked on US Airways' first Chapter 11 case. US Airways emerged from its second bankruptcy reorganization in 2005.

Ray Neidl, an airline analyst with Calyon Securities Inc., said convincing Delta's major creditors will be crucial if US Airways wants this deal to work.

"If the creditors see a better proposal, then the management would probably have to listen to them," he said.

Resisting Us Airways' Advances

For now, Delta is still resisting US Airways' advances. Chief Executive Gerald Grinstein responded Wednesday with a terse statement, making it clear that the company still plans to move forward with a stand-alone reorganization and that it intends to invoke its control over its Chapter 11 case to do so.

"The bankruptcy court has granted Delta the exclusive right to create a plan of reorganization until Feb. 15, 2007," he said. "We will continue to move aggressively toward that goal."

Delta, the nation's fourth largest airline, sought Chapter 11 protection on Sept. 14, 2005, about a month before changes to the Bankruptcy Code that sharply curbed debtor control in Chapter 11 cases took effect. Accordingly, the airline can expect to continue to drive its own reorganization process even beyond the current Feb. 15 plan filing deadline.

Companies in Chapter 11 protection are given an exclusive period of time to file a Chapter 11 reorganization plan, but can seek extensions if negotiations with creditors are moving forward. Although last year's bankruptcy law changes limit those to a maximum of 18 months, Delta could potentially enjoy unlimited extensions -- as did UAL Corp., the parent of United Airlines, which spent more than three years in bankruptcy.

Creditors can seek to end a company's exclusive control over its Chapter 11 case so they can file their own reorganization proposals. But bankruptcy experts say Delta's creditors would face an uphill battle wresting control from a team of competent executives managing a viable company.

Over the last year or so, Delta has negotiated deals to terminate its pilots' pension plan, obtained $280 million in annual wage-and-benefit concessions from its pilots, and said it's "on track" to exit Chapter 11 proceedings by the middle of 2007. The airline has also recalled 1,000 flight attendants in preparation for a major expansion of its international routes.

"Bankruptcy courts don't terminate exclusivity easily or quickly," Mr. Rochelle said. "It takes a lot of banging on the door before things happen."

In the absence of a deal with management, convincing a pivotal group of unsecured creditors -- the official committee that represents them in the airline's Chapter 11 case -- will be key.

The panel, formed early in every Chapter 11 case and usually made up of the largest unsecured creditors, has significant influence in a bankruptcy case and can be instrumental in swaying the court to second-guess a debtor company's business judgment.

The Delta committee, which includes aircraft financier Boeing Capital Corp., the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., Bank of New York Co. and the Air Line Pilots Association, hasn't yet shown its hand. Calls to committee members and the attorney who represents them weren't returned Wednesday.

US Airways could choose to buy Delta's unsecured claims in order to gain a foothold in the case and command the committee's attention, a move potential buyers often employ in smaller Chapter 11 cases.

For example, the hedge fund Harbinger Capital Partners forced an exclusivity battle in the bankruptcy of West Coast jewelry chain Crescent Jewelers and ultimately won control of the company post-bankruptcy. Harbinger later merged the company with another company it bought out of Chapter 11 -- East Coast chain Friedman's Inc.

Financier Ron Burkle's Yucaipa Cos. has bought up unsecured debt of rival auto-hauling companies Allied Holdings Inc. and Performance Transportation Services Inc., which are both operating under Chapter 11 protection, and is expected to attempt to merge them post-bankruptcy.

US Airways, whose smooth merger last fall with America West had management backing, has the experience of two past Chapter 11 cases as it moves forward with its proposal.

The airline could ally itself with other major creditors to force Delta -- or the Manhattan bankruptcy court -- to move toward a merger.

"Management will have to consider what the creditors want," Mr. Neidl said. "It's the most important element of the company now, and they'll at least have to listen to their opinion."

But Mr. Rochelle of Fulbright & Jaworski said he'd be surprised if Delta and its major creditors "ran off in different directions."

He also questioned whether US Airways' Mr. Parker, widely regarded as a savvy executive who saved his airline from extinction, would want to be the architect of a deal built on a bitter battle between Delta and its creditors.

"I don't know whether Doug Parker would want to do it on a highly adversarial basis," Mr. Rochelle said. "That would really not create the kind of an effective working environment you need to integrate three airlines.
 
Personally, I give it one chance in three.
 
The thing to keep in mind is the fact that Greenjeans was only CEO of Western for TWO years. In that time he managed to Merge with Delta.

What happened next? He went to Burlington Northern.
Where are they today? A victim of another Greenjeans merger.

This guy was not brought in to save anything. Look at his history.

The problem is, I don't think that this is what he had in mind, that's why he's pissed. IMHO, Parker (like any good ceo) got wind of another deal (possibly w/UAL), looked at the numbers and decided that he would make the first strike. An UAL/DAL deal would have been based upon stock not cash for the creditors.

Now Greenjeans, is PO'd because the deal that he had been working on in just a distant memory because Paker has jumped in with $4 billion in cash + real stock (no ch11, that can be traded today) to raise the cost on anything that Greenjeans wanted to do.
 
Last edited:
"Easy big fella. As much as you'd like to see the demise of DL, the surviving name will be DELTA, much to your dissapointment. That's a big "IF" it even goes through!"

You seem to have a penchat for jumping to unsubstanciated conclusions. No where in any post have I ever advocated the demise of DAL. I'm only pointing out that You, Mr. G and everyone else at DAL will have nothing to say about this if the creditors and the bankruptcy judge agree it's a good deal! The regulators not withstanding,won't be a factor and will capitulate to bankruptcy proceedings.
 
Just looking at the big-picture, IF the take-over of DAL is approved, how much $$$ will the creditors get vs. how much the creditors will get if Delta emerges on it's own? Keep in mind that the price will likely go even higher than the 8.7B.

Money talks!
 
i think parker may have just thrown it out there to get things moving. he wants another merger that is for certain but i dont think he necessarily cares if its delta. now that this is out there northwest is going to be scrambling to merge with someone to stay in existence. maybe in their desperation parker will get a bargain for northwest. i think northwest makes a lot more sense, delta will survive as a stand alone carrier but i think with northwest the prospect of standing alone is very shaky. plus i think us air and northwest have a lot less overlap and usair would certainly love to get those asian routes.
 
"Easy big fella. As much as you'd like to see the demise of DL, the surviving name will be DELTA, much to your dissapointment. That's a big "IF" it even goes through!"

You seem to have a penchat for jumping to unsubstanciated conclusions. No where in any post have I ever advocated the demise of DAL. I'm only pointing out that You, Mr. G and everyone else at DAL will have nothing to say about this if the creditors and the bankruptcy judge agree it's a good deal! The regulators not withstanding,won't be a factor and will capitulate to bankruptcy proceedings.

Did you ever figure out who the majority creditors are? Boeing, ALPA, Bank of NY, and the PBGC. I would think that Boeing would want to keep an "all Boeing" Delta, especially with future orders coming up, and USAir having mostly Airbus airplanes. ALPA will not vote for a merger that is not what the members want or that could produce less members. That is DALPA (not really ALPA) since they owe the Delta pilots (DALPA) a $2.1 billion claim.

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Did you ever figure out who the majority creditors are? Boeing, ALPA, Bank of NY, and the PBGC. I would think that Boeing would want to keep an "all Boeing" Delta, especially with future orders coming up, and USAir having mostly Airbus airplanes. ALPA will not vote for a merger that is not what the members want or that could produce less members. That is DALPA (not really ALPA) since they owe the Delta pilots (DALPA) a $2.1 billion claim.

Bye Bye--General Lee

Have You? You seem to have forgotten debtors in possession, bond holders,and class "A" stock holders. Some of which may be included above but it DOES NOT include ALPA, DALPA, Jerry and the Boys in the band! Your claim is way down the list and I'll assure you a mere peep in a world of noise! You may continue to believe you have a say in this but I submit you are only whistling past the grave yard.

Things will get worse before they get better UAL won't let this go by without a fight. But all in all you'll be alright in a few years....whereas others won't!
 
Just looking at the big-picture, IF the take-over of DAL is approved, how much $$$ will the creditors get vs. how much the creditors will get if Delta emerges on it's own? Keep in mind that the price will likely go even higher than the 8.7B.

Money talks!

Can DAL raise that money it needs to exit on its own? Is DAL more valuable as a stand alone carrier with a relatively clean balance sheet or more valuable merging with US and taking on $8B in new debt?

Remember, USAirways isn't financing this deal, they're borrowing money from the financial institutions to pay off the creditors and then saddle the new enterprise with debt. Is that in the best interest of the company, which is in BK mostly to shed debt and obligations? Just like the courts traditionally side with management in an 1113 proceeding against an unsecured creditor, they'll probably side with management on this too. Of course anything is possible. US sure does want DAL in a bad way.
 
You may continue to believe you have a say in this but I submit you are only whistling past the grave yard.

Actually a DAL pilot representative is on the creditors committee and has just the same number of votes as any other member of the committee. One.

Spinproof, why do you personally think hostile takeovers rarely succeed when a company is in chapter 11 bankruptcy protection? Do you think the word "protection" was thrown in there as an after thought or do you think there was actually a reason they use it? Just curious, because you seem to know a great deal about the process.
 
Actually a DAL pilot representative is on the creditors committee and has just the same number of votes as any other member of the committee. One.

Spinproof, why do you personally think hostile takeovers rarely succeed when a company is in chapter 11 bankruptcy protection? Do you think the word "protection" was thrown in there as an after thought or do you think there was actually a reason they use it? Just curious, because you seem to know a great deal about the process.

I'm not for or against takeovers, hostile or friendly! Their success rates hidge on many factors. All of which will be addressed. I do believe it to be a brilliant move by the US Air group. While DAL is protected from this move until a date certain, playing one's cards face up gives creditors pause.

Chapter 11 allows a company a period of time to re-organize it's debts without having to "sell all the children to save the family"."Protection" is an over used word that is only good as long as the proceedure has the approval of the courts. Once the company has presented it's final plan to exit Chapter 11 the courts decide (Judge) whether any competing plans have merit. In escence which plan has to greatest chance of success, with the greatest return for the greatest number.

You tell me? Which plan will be accepted? A promise of good things to come from DAL management or 4Billion cash- in- fist plus 4 billion in stock and a promise of good things to come?

This has just started...there will be other suitors!!!!

No expert here just reading the tea leaves......
 
You tell me? Which plan will be accepted? A promise of good things to come from DAL management or 4Billion cash- in- fist plus 4 billion in stock and a promise of good things to come?
.....

You forgot to mention nearly $8B in additional debt the merger would bring, and that Parker himself stated that most of the benefit would be had if the deal was consumated during the BK process, not upon exit. We also don't know what the POR is yet, or what DAL is willing to offer the creditors.

Consolidation is a part of the industry, if it happens to DAL in a hostile takeover, well that's just a part of being in aviation. This takeover attempt could succeed, stranger things have happened, but I doubt it will succeed.

For now all any of us have is opinions, and just like ______(fill in an appropriate body part), everyone has one.
 
Last edited:
Spinproof quote:

"You tell me? Which plan will be accepted? A promise of good things to come from DAL management or 4Billion cash-in-fist plus 4 billion in stock and a promise of good things to come?"

Is a bird in the hand worth two in the bush?
 
Last edited:
Did you ever figure out who the majority creditors are? Boeing, ALPA, Bank of NY, and the PBGC. I would think that Boeing would want to keep an "all Boeing" Delta, especially with future orders coming up, and USAir having mostly Airbus airplanes. ALPA will not vote for a merger that is not what the members want or that could produce less members. That is DALPA (not really ALPA) since they owe the Delta pilots (DALPA) a $2.1 billion claim.

Bye Bye--General Lee

Here you go General:

COMMITTEE OF INFLUENCE
Delta's unsecured creditors committee has nine members who represent thousands of creditors. The committee, which includes smaller creditors as well as some of the largest, plays a key role in deciding whether to back the airline's reorganization plan or a potential outsider's plan, such as US Airways' merger proposal.
• Boeing: The jet maker has a $3.7 billion claim from Delta's future aircraft commitments.
• Fidelity: An investment firm headquartered in Boston.
• Coca-Cola: Atlanta-based soft drink maker has a claim of at least $468,034.
• Pratt & Whitney: The engine supplier, a unit of United Technologies, has claims of at least $3.6 million.
• Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.: The federal agency insuring pensions has a $2.9 billion claim.
• Air Line Pilots Association: The pilots union holds a $2.1 billion claim related to its pay and pension concessions.
• Bank of New York: This big banking firm is a trustee for Delta bondholders.
• U.S. Bancorp: A financial institution.
• MacKay Shields: An investment unit of New York Life.

The bet on Wall Street is the US Air plan has an 80% chance to succeed.
 
Last edited:
Since Boeing offered us 60 of Deltas future 737s I wouldn't be to sure who they will side with. The General just needs to relax. This could just be a ploy by Parker to get United off their rear. Meanwhile he'll take his bag-o-cash over to Northwest. All I know is Parker is a lot smarter than anyone on this board.
 
http://www.ajc.com/services/content...7bizdelta1117.html?cxtype=rss&cxsvc=7&cxcat=6


If you don't have a subcription to the AJC you may go to ALPA web board right column Industry news feed "Analysts bullish on bid for Delta ".

Actually the article said that some industry analyst give it an 80% chance, it doesn't state that Wall Street gives it an 80% chance. The article goes on to mention that some analyst see issues with federal regulators and that the creditors committee may have concerns over whether such a deal might pass. With a 36% system overlap and no fleet commonality the merger brings few synergies.

"Some industry analysts say US Airways' blockbuster, unsolicited bid — the value of which has risen to almost $8.8 billion since it was announced Wednesday — has as much as an 80 percent chance of happening.

But others contend that federal regulators' scrutiny of the would-be takeover of Delta could delay the Atlanta airline's exit from bankruptcy by months, or the regulators could even scuttle the deal over antitrust issues.

Such concerns are among the reasons that a court-appointed creditors committee, which holds huge sway in Delta's Chapter 11 reorganization, might pass on the deal that would create the nation's largest airline, according to a person familiar with the bankruptcy case."
 
Last edited:
you may pick any "part" that suits you but this is the entire article and the title, in my opinion, says it all.


Analysts bullish on bid for Delta
Skeptics say feds could scuttle it

By RUSSELL GRANTHAM
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 11/17/06
Wall Street is giving US Airways high odds of succeeding in its bid to buy Delta Air Lines, but others say not so fast.
Some industry analysts say US Airways' blockbuster, unsolicited bid — the value of which has risen to almost $8.8 billion since it was announced Wednesday — has as much as an 80 percent chance of happening.
COMMITTEE OF INFLUENCE
Delta's unsecured creditors committee has nine members who represent thousands of creditors. The committee, which includes smaller creditors as well as some of the largest, plays a key role in deciding whether to back the airline's reorganization plan or a potential outsider's plan, such as US Airways' merger proposal.

• Boeing: The jet maker has a $3.7 billion claim from Delta's future aircraft commitments.
• Fidelity: An investment firm headquartered in Boston.
• Coca-Cola: Atlanta-based soft drink maker has a claim of at least $468,034.
• Pratt & Whitney: The engine supplier, a unit of United Technologies, has claims of at least $3.6 million.
• Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.: The federal agency insuring pensions has a $2.9 billion claim.
• Air Line Pilots Association: The pilots union holds a $2.1 billion claim related to its pay and pension concessions.
• Bank of New York: This big banking firm is a trustee for Delta bondholders.
• U.S. Bancorp: A financial institution.
• MacKay Shields: An investment unit of New York Life.

But others contend that federal regulators' scrutiny of the would-be takeover of Delta could delay the Atlanta airline's exit from bankruptcy by months, or the regulators could even scuttle the deal over antitrust issues.

Such concerns are among the reasons that a court-appointed creditors committee, which holds huge sway in Delta's Chapter 11 reorganization, might pass on the deal that would create the nation's largest airline, according to a person familiar with the bankruptcy case.
While that person, who requested anonymity, said creditors might conclude the proposed merger is better than keeping Delta independent, they also noted that it will likely take weeks of analysis by Delta management and the creditors committee before a decision is made on whether to encourage the deal.

US Airways took its hostile bid public Wednesday after being twice rebuffed by Delta's management, which had informed creditors about the earlier overtures.
If successful, US Airways would combine two airlines whose routes overlap 36 percent — more than any other potential marriage of Delta and another airline, according to the person familiar with the bankruptcy proceedings. That overlap dramatically raises the odds that the U.S. Department of Justice will reject or seriously delay the merger, said the person.

To get government approval, US Airways would not only have to shed one of two competing shuttle subsidiaries the two airlines operate in the Northeast, but also might have to shed more than 10 percent of its overall operations, the person said. That might include dismantling the US Airways hub in Charlotte, which serves many of the same markets as Delta's Atlanta hub.
"There is some view that this would be the most difficult merger to get done because of the overlap," the person said. "You have to know this is going to get a lot of scrutiny."

Creditors a key

Besides those hurdles, the deal also faces opposition from Delta's management. It also might encounter political opposition, ranging from cities concerned about their air service to resurgent Democrats on Capitol Hill who may investigate the effects of airline consolidation.
But at least initially, the deal also will swing on whether US Airways can convince enough members of Delta's influential creditors committee of its merits. The nine-member unsecured creditors committee — which includes such corporate icons as Coca-Cola and Boeing — has a big say in Delta's future because it represents thousands of creditors who will ultimately vote on the reorganization plan Delta needs to exit from bankruptcy protection. Delta filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy last fall.

As part of that role, the committee also has significant influence in shaping the reorganization plan, including choosing Delta's board of directors and its next management team, said Jeff Morris, a law professor and bankruptcy expert at the University of Dayton School of Law.
Delta's secured lenders — those whose loans are backed by aircraft and other assets — technically have even more clout, but their debts are often paid off in a merger, Morris said.

"They can't complain if you pay them off," Morris said.
US Airways' offer is backed by a $7.2 billion financing commitment from Citigroup. The airline has offered to pay creditors $4 billion in cash and give them 78.5 million US Airways shares — initially worth $4 billion but now up to almost $4.8 billion at Thursday's market close. US Airways shares have risen 19 percent since the bid was announced.

Delta's unsecured creditor committee, with its diverse members ranging from Boeing to bond investors to trade vendors to its pilots' union, will undoubtedly have differing perspectives on US Airways' offer, said Morris. Some may view US Airways as "coming in to get the good stuff" now that Delta's prospects are improving, he said.

The view of others, he said, is "how do I get my money fast?"
The Atlanta unit of the Air Line Pilots Association, which has a $2.1 billion claim stemming from a prior deal with Delta in which it agreed to huge concessions, has said it is waiting for more information.
Attorneys for Coca-Cola and Pratt & Whitney, other members of the committee, could not be reached for comment Thursday.

Handicappers optimistic

While Wall Street analysts acknowledged that the proposed merger faces potential antitrust issues and other hurdles, some concluded the odds are still fairly high that US Airways will succeed.

Merrill Lynch analyst Michael Linenberg gives US Airways about a 60 percent chance of getting a merger agreement, citing Chief Executive Doug Parker's track record with turning the money-losing America West into a profitable carrier that acquired US Airways in a merger that many in the industry view as a success.

"We think this is achievable. If there is one management that is able to pull this off, it is this management," Linenberg said in a Thursday conference call with investors. He said US Airways will agree to whatever conditions the Justice Department sets to approve the merger.

JPMorgan analyst Jamie Baker puts the odds even higher, despite his firm's analysis that a US Airways-Delta merger would affect more cities than any other likely combination. The increased market concentration in 11 cities, including Boston, Tampa and Seattle, is "potentially unacceptable to regulators," he said in a report.
Still, he said there's an 80 percent chance that US Airways or another acquirer will succeed in getting creditor and regulatory approval.
"Clearly, lots of twists and turns lie ahead," he said.

Delta execs silent

Meanwhile, Delta executives have seemingly climbed into the cellar and slammed the door, perhaps to revise the reorganization plan they have been working on for months.

While US Airways CEO Parker did a full-court press Wednesday of media interviews and conference calls with investors, Delta CEO Gerald Grinstein restricted his response largely to a memorandum to employees that was forwarded to the press.

On Thursday, Delta's executive vice president in charge of routes and revenue management, Glen Hauenstein, canceled a public appearance at Kennesaw State University.

"There are other things occupying our executives' time, so we will reschedule," said Delta spokeswoman Gina Laughlin, adding that the airline's executive team is reviewing the proposal "as we are obligated to do."





COMMITTEE OF INFLUENCE
Delta's unsecured creditors committee has nine members who represent thousands of creditors. The committee, which includes smaller creditors as well as some of the largest, plays a key role in deciding whether to back the airline's reorganization plan or a potential outsider's plan, such as US Airways' merger proposal.
• Boeing: The jet maker has a $3.7 billion claim from Delta's future aircraft commitments.
• Fidelity: An investment firm headquartered in Boston.
• Coca-Cola: Atlanta-based soft drink maker has a claim of at least $468,034.
• Pratt & Whitney: The engine supplier, a unit of United Technologies, has claims of at least $3.6 million.
• Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.: The federal agency insuring pensions has a $2.9 billion claim.
• Air Line Pilots Association: The pilots union holds a $2.1 billion claim related to its pay and pension concessions.
• Bank of New York: This big banking firm is a trustee for Delta bondholders.
• U.S. Bancorp: A financial institution.
• MacKay Shields: An investment unit of New York Life.
 
Last edited:
you may pick any "part" that suits you but this is the entire article and the title, in my opinion, says it all.

You're entitled to your opinion, you're just not entitled to your facts. You stated that Wall Street gives the merger an 80% chance of success. Well, that's not at all what the article said, the article found one analyst that gave the merger an 80% chance. Big difference.

Here's an article that says Parker just threw a "Hail Mary". Of course this article doesn't come from the AJC, it actually comes from the WSJ.

Bankruptcy Court Can Be Tough
Venue for Hostile Takeovers
By MARIE BEAUDETTE and LAURA MCGANN
November 15, 2006 4:20 p.m.

US Airways Chief Executive Doug Parker faces a major handicap in his $8 billion bid to acquire unreceptive Delta Air Lines Inc.: Bankruptcy courts tend to be poor staging grounds for hostile takeovers.

Unless Delta's management can be persuaded to go along with the deal or its creditors stage a revolt in the bankruptcy court, US Airway's bid is a longshot, bankruptcy experts said Wednesday. Delta has exclusive control over its Chapter 11 case through at least early February, and bankruptcy courts seldom overrule management when things are going smoothly.

Mr. Parker "basically lobbed this Hail Mary pass up in the air to see who's going to catch it," said Fulbright & Jaworski partner William Rochelle. "To be able to have a prayer for success, he's got to be able to generate interest from creditors."

Mr. Rochelle, who represents secured creditors in airline bankruptcy cases, said Parker chose the "least offensive method" to persuade Delta to accept its proposal. Rebuffed by Delta's management, he decided to publicly court the carrier's unsecured creditors, who stand to gain a 45% stake in what would be one of the world's largest airlines.

But Mr. Parker, the America West chief who took the helm of US Airways when it merged with the Arizona-based carrier last fall, could be in for a bumpy ride as he attempts to take over a company protected by the bankruptcy court.

"If management is hostile to the US Airways proposal, US Airways may find it difficult to force its way into the room," said Reed Smith bankruptcy partner Eric Schaffer, who worked on US Airways' first Chapter 11 case. US Airways emerged from its second bankruptcy reorganization in 2005.

Ray Neidl, an airline analyst with Calyon Securities Inc., said convincing Delta's major creditors will be crucial if US Airways wants this deal to work.

"If the creditors see a better proposal, then the management would probably have to listen to them," he said.

Resisting Us Airways' Advances

For now, Delta is still resisting US Airways' advances. Chief Executive Gerald Grinstein responded Wednesday with a terse statement, making it clear that the company still plans to move forward with a stand-alone reorganization and that it intends to invoke its control over its Chapter 11 case to do so.

"The bankruptcy court has granted Delta the exclusive right to create a plan of reorganization until Feb. 15, 2007," he said. "We will continue to move aggressively toward that goal."

Delta, the nation's fourth largest airline, sought Chapter 11 protection on Sept. 14, 2005, about a month before changes to the Bankruptcy Code that sharply curbed debtor control in Chapter 11 cases took effect. Accordingly, the airline can expect to continue to drive its own reorganization process even beyond the current Feb. 15 plan filing deadline.

Companies in Chapter 11 protection are given an exclusive period of time to file a Chapter 11 reorganization plan, but can seek extensions if negotiations with creditors are moving forward. Although last year's bankruptcy law changes limit those to a maximum of 18 months, Delta could potentially enjoy unlimited extensions -- as did UAL Corp., the parent of United Airlines, which spent more than three years in bankruptcy.

Creditors can seek to end a company's exclusive control over its Chapter 11 case so they can file their own reorganization proposals. But bankruptcy experts say Delta's creditors would face an uphill battle wresting control from a team of competent executives managing a viable company.

Over the last year or so, Delta has negotiated deals to terminate its pilots' pension plan, obtained $280 million in annual wage-and-benefit concessions from its pilots, and said it's "on track" to exit Chapter 11 proceedings by the middle of 2007. The airline has also recalled 1,000 flight attendants in preparation for a major expansion of its international routes.

"Bankruptcy courts don't terminate exclusivity easily or quickly," Mr. Rochelle said. "It takes a lot of banging on the door before things happen."

In the absence of a deal with management, convincing a pivotal group of unsecured creditors -- the official committee that represents them in the airline's Chapter 11 case -- will be key.

The panel, formed early in every Chapter 11 case and usually made up of the largest unsecured creditors, has significant influence in a bankruptcy case and can be instrumental in swaying the court to second-guess a debtor company's business judgment.

The Delta committee, which includes aircraft financier Boeing Capital Corp., the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., Bank of New York Co. and the Air Line Pilots Association, hasn't yet shown its hand. Calls to committee members and the attorney who represents them weren't returned Wednesday.

US Airways could choose to buy Delta's unsecured claims in order to gain a foothold in the case and command the committee's attention, a move potential buyers often employ in smaller Chapter 11 cases.

For example, the hedge fund Harbinger Capital Partners forced an exclusivity battle in the bankruptcy of West Coast jewelry chain Crescent Jewelers and ultimately won control of the company post-bankruptcy. Harbinger later merged the company with another company it bought out of Chapter 11 -- East Coast chain Friedman's Inc.

Financier Ron Burkle's Yucaipa Cos. has bought up unsecured debt of rival auto-hauling companies Allied Holdings Inc. and Performance Transportation Services Inc., which are both operating under Chapter 11 protection, and is expected to attempt to merge them post-bankruptcy.

US Airways, whose smooth merger last fall with America West had management backing, has the experience of two past Chapter 11 cases as it moves forward with its proposal.

The airline could ally itself with other major creditors to force Delta -- or the Manhattan bankruptcy court -- to move toward a merger.

"Management will have to consider what the creditors want," Mr. Neidl said. "It's the most important element of the company now, and they'll at least have to listen to their opinion."

But Mr. Rochelle of Fulbright & Jaworski said he'd be surprised if Delta and its major creditors "ran off in different directions."

He also questioned whether US Airways' Mr. Parker, widely regarded as a savvy executive who saved his airline from extinction, would want to be the architect of a deal built on a bitter battle between Delta and its creditors.

"I don't know whether Doug Parker would want to do it on a highly adversarial basis," Mr. Rochelle said. "That would really not create the kind of an effective working environment you need to integrate three airlines.
 
Last edited:
I really can't see your point. The title says "Analysts bullish on bid for Delta" which is more than one!!!!
I didn't write the article. There was alot more to the article than you suggest by your postings yet you seem to ignor its conclusion.

Futher more I really don't care and I'll assure you I am through bantering. How about this.... Delta will emerge from Bankruptcy as a stand alone carrier and everyone lives happily ever after......ah now isn't that better.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom