Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

WTC insurers sue airlines over 9/11 attack

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

need2AV8

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2001
Posts
81
NEW YORK (Reuters) ? On the day before the third anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States, insurers for some World Trade Center buildings sued American and United Airlines and others alleging their negligence allowed the deadly hijackings.

The suit, which was filed by London's QBE International Insurance and certain underwriters at Lloyd's of London, seeks over $300 million from each of the two airlines and various amounts from other defendants. The insurers want to recover monies they paid out for property damage and other losses caused to World Trade Center buildings 1,2,4 and 5 and nearby structures.

The case is among a number of Sept. 11 related suits filed recently to meet the three-year statute of limitations deadline Saturday. Among defendants in the case are the airlines' parents AMR Corp. and UAL Corp.

United said it does not comment on pending litigation. American did not have an immediate comment.

On Sept. 11, 2001, hijackers penetrated security at Boston's Logan airport and flew American Flight 11 and United Flight 175 to Manhattan crashing the aircraft into the World Trade Center and causing towers One and Two to collapse.

Among other defendants named in the suit are Boeing Co., Pinkerton's Inc., ICTS International NV and US Airways Group .


If your car starts making some really BAD noise when driving, just fix it by just getting bigger speakers and turning up the radio. Isn't that the mentality the insurance company exhibits by not attacking the problem at it's SOURCE! Why not sue Boeing and Airbus for making airplanes? Oops, I think I might have just given them their next victim.

Madness.
 
I knew that sh!t was coming. You think "stanley knife" is listed in that lawsuit as well?

When Armalite gave the settlement just a day or so ago to the victims of the beltway sniper shootings, they gave away more than just the money. They gave away the gateway to people to sue the manufacturers of products...even if the product wasn't the reason why people died.

Now we'll be able to sue Delco, because they had deep pockets and their stereo was installed in the car of the drunk driver that killed our loved ones.
 
need2AV8 said:
... Why not sue Boeing and Airbus for making airplanes? Oops, I think I might have just given them their next victim.

Madness.

Nah...lets just go after the Wright family...or better yet...Bernoulli and Newton...they're the ones at the bottom of this thing...

this is so rediculous...I can't believe someone even let them "file" this suit...doesn't anyone anywhere have common sense anymore?

-mini

PS Wait...its not April 1st is it? nope...yeah this is stupid
 
All is not lost. My theory is that lawyers will push things so far over the top that eventually us ordinary people will say, "Enough!" and we will have a huge outcry against this insanity, a congressional investigation and finally some relief in the form of laws to restore normalcy.
I am not holding my breath as to when, but it will. Just a matter of how ridiculous, and how large the lawsuit, how many people are affected before change comes.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom