Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

What the REAL analyst have to say

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Wiskey Driver

Return of the Hub Raider
Joined
Aug 31, 2002
Posts
1,308
Is Delta Nearly Done?

By Tim Beyers
January 12, 2007
With each passing day, it becomes increasingly likely that Delta Air Lines, the nation's third-largest carrier, will soon be no more.
Blame US Airways (NYSE: LCC). CEO Doug Parker, who in November proposed buying out Delta's creditors for $8.3 billion in cash and stock, this week upped his airline's bid by roughly $2 billion.
That leaves Delta's largest bondholders, which includes Boeing (NYSE: BA) and its pilots' union, in a tough spot. If they consent to the US Airways bid, thousands of layoffs and deep infrastructure cutbacks will be implemented, amounting to what Parker has said would be $1.65 billion in cost savings.
If they choose Delta's stand-alone reorganization plan, they'll exchange short-term gains for the promise of as much as $1.2 billion in net profit in 2010. That, management argues, would create an independent carrier worth between $9.4 billion and $12 billion.
But will creditors buy it? Maybe. UAL Corp.'s (Nasdaq: UAUA) United Airlines has certainly done well in the year since it emerged from bankruptcy. According to its latest quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the firm booked $190 million, or $1.30 per diluted share, in net income in the quarter ended on Sept. 30.
By increasing its offer, U.S. Airways is betting that creditors won't want to wait and see if Delta is capable of performing similarly, or that Delta can't afford to come up with a better deal to remain independent.
Smart move. Like all the other legacy carriers, Delta has already won huge concessions from its workforce. Bleeding them for more isn't likely. Meanwhile, investment returns in the airline industry have become notoriously short-lived. That's why some creditors have urged management to consider options outside of its own reorganization plan.
And they may be. The Wall Street Journal now reports that similarly bankrupt Northwest Airlines has begun merger discussions with Delta. Northwest won't confirm the talks but, if the Journal is correct, the negotiations could increase the options for both creditors and Delta.
For creditors -- which, remember, includes Delta's pilots' union -- there's the hope of a payout at least equal to what US Airways can offer. And for Delta, there's the hope of survival without having to lay off tens of thousands of workers.
In fact, that's likely to be the primary appeal of a Northwest-Delta combination. There's little operational overlap between the two carriers: Northwest's primary U.S. hubs are in the Midwest (Detroit and Minneapolis), whereas Delta is strongest in the south (Atlanta). Moreover, Northwest's European and Asian operations could add higher-profit routes for a combined airline.
Then there's bankruptcy. For all the complaints about United CEO Glenn Tilton, he kept the airline in hock for years, to the point where the courts became a tool for reshaping the carrier in ways that wouldn't have otherwise been possible. United is healthier today as a result of that foot-dragging. Unfair, you say? Maybe so, but it's worked.
Why couldn't Northwest and Delta do the same? Brokering a deal now and working out the kinks while still under the purview of the courts could allow for the freedom to negotiate everything from salary cuts to work rules. That way, were a deal to be completed, Northwest-Delta would emerge from bankruptcy fully formed and ready to compete.
But even if that's not on the table, it seems likely to me that, with all the options creditors have been given, the least attractive is an independent Delta. And that's sad. Delta is a proud carrier with an excellent tradition that goes back as far as any of its peers. Yet not even tradition can change the brutal reality that it participates in an industry that's been flying low for far too long. Creditors, rightly, are finally demanding higher altitudes.
 
Sounds like the real analysts say that a merger with NWA is far better than a merger with USAir. If this happens expect a UAL-CAL merger, which will leave USAir ..........
 
Makes Carl Marx's "Communist Manifesto" seem that much more credible watching all these massive companies merging.
 
No doubt the DAL/NWA combination would be much better strategically than the proposed US/DAL combination given NWA's Asian routes and generally lack of route overlap. That being said, if you allow one big merger you have to allow other big mergers leading to potentially far fewer choices for consumers - especially in smaller markets. I don't see the DOJ allowing that.
 
which will leave USAir ..........

thats what dougy is scared of - he has said it before that he/we (U) doesn't want to be the one without a partner when the music stops. Guess thats why U is being agressive with this deal. Like most I don't want any merger(s) but I can see where dougy is comming from wrt to someone being left alone when the music stops.

I think the only real benifitor(s) in the U/Delta deal (outside on the board/management/lawyers) will be SWA and Airtran.

Maybe on the other hand we (U) should let everyone else (UAL, DAL, CAL, NWA ect.) merge and we stay small(er), focused and lean - able to adabt while keeping a large LCC domestic structure with valued international routes, but then again I'm not running the ship so what do I know.
 
No doubt the DAL/NWA combination would be much better strategically than the proposed US/DAL combination given NWA's Asian routes and generally lack of route overlap.

Yep. Two defunct, bankrupt carriers are definitely better than one. :laugh:

Let both of these bankrupt carriers die and the industry will be much healthier.

Given the BK laws... you have got to REALLY screw up... and I mean ROYALLY for an airline to actually go out of business.

BBB
 
Are these analysts better than the others?

Reading that article it sounds like they think NWA and DL should be together. I agree, if a merger has to happen. We would merge, then CAL would be free to merge with UAL, AA would stand alone, and everyone would then pick on USAir and Parker. It makes the most sense. A stand alone Delta may not be in the works I guess, but a combination with USAir would mean disaster, and even the politicians know that.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Maybe 50% goes to NWA and 50% will go to Usair.


Nah, we have enough politicians on our side to not let that happen. If we merge, it is highly likely now it will be with NWA. The DOJ won't allow a US/DL merge anyway.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Delta's Management has quite the incentive to make the company emerge as a stand-alone company, it's called money-- when they issue the IPO for millions in their pockets ala LCC and UAUA; a USAIR deal means, no money. Why do you think they moved up their filings and exit date? However, give a hand to USAIR for a win-win situation they're presenting. If the merger goes through, an asset sale is forthcoming, a stronger company maybe; if it doesn't, it forces Delta to exit bankruptcy before it is ready and probably makes for a weaker competitor in the future. The danger? Even if it gets approved by the creditors, they have to get it past the DOJ. Look at how much USAIR and UAL spent on a merger that never took place, followed by an immediate entry into Chapter 11 after 9/11. No, I believe Delta will emerge as a stand-alone company if for no other reason than the incentive the managers have for making money.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom