Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Venr, Vyse

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

cezzna

Remeber the analog
Joined
Jan 24, 2003
Posts
291
Posted this earlier, FSI is teaching that VENR is the same as VYSE, if nobody here can tell me the difference where should I look. I know that it's not right, just need the evidence.
 
mazawakhan said:
OK! WTF is Venr? In over ten years of flying I have yet to hear of that one!

In over 18 years of flying I have yet to hear of that one!
 
kevdog said:
In over 18 years of flying I have yet to hear of that one!

I'm going to go out on a limb and say it's the same as what a lot of people call Vt....best climb in a clean configuration. I hink it stands for V-enroute. Just guessing though.
 
I never heard of it either...
 
I had never heard of Venr until I flew Hawkers. It is never really defined in the FSI Hawker training manuals as anything but a final OEI climb speed. Venr will only be about 186 KIAS for a MGTOW (28,000 lb) 800XP. The aircraft is to be flown at this speed after reaching 1,500' AGL or running out of time on the takeoff engine limits, cancelling APR and setting max continuous thrust on the remaining engine. In practice, the -5BR engines are nowhere near limiting temps or speeds so no reduction would normally be necessary. This is a certification profile of course and bears little resemblance to the profile that would actually be flown in IMC over anything but flat ground. Venr is a performance speed like V2, meaning it's primary purpose was to establish a OEI climb profile for certification and may or may not be intended to achieve max SE ROC. Since climb gradient is our primary concern following takeoff, we would not normally accelerate to this speed until clear of all obstacles if visual, or at the minimum required IFR altitude if not. In any case, Venr is just a bit more than 1.6 Vs and would be pretty close to Vyse if that term were used. For the fullest possible explanation, post this in the tech log at PPRuNe. Guaranteed to to get you more of an answer than you bargained for!

Best,
 
We use it at CommutAir -- it's defined as the single-engine enroute climb speed. In the event of an engine failure on takeoff, we climb at V2 until 400 feet, accelerate to Venr, and then climb at that speed.

I suppose it could be the same speed in some airplanes, but it isn't in ours in most cases. For example, a fully-loaded 1900 would have a Venr of 123, while Vyse is 128. Definitely not the same speed.
 
asayankee said:
I'm going to go out on a limb and say it's the same as what a lot of people call Vt....best climb in a clean configuration. I hink it stands for V-enroute. Just guessing though.

or Vfs
 
Well I guess if UndauntedFlyer hasn't heard of it, then it truly does not exist.

His Airworthiness ladies and gentlemen.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top