Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

VASI Distance - SM or NM

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
The point is, prevailing visibility IS NOT the same as flight visibility. The statement that "Prevailing visibility is flight visibility" is completely WRONG.

BFD you say? BFD indeed. Example:

To continue past the FAF prevailing (reported) visibility is controlling, once inside the FAF flight visibility is controlling. The terms have distinct and separate meanings and are not interchangable

Pilots have been violated for continuing past the FAF with prevailing vis below mins and flight visibility above mins mistakenly believing, as apparently others do as well, that "Prevailing visibility is flight visibility". Well, that's as wrong as two boys F***ING. (As those crews later found out)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
121.651

(b) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, no pilot may continue an approach past the final approach fix, or where a final approach fix is not used, begin the final approach segment of an instrument approach procedure--
(1) At any airport, unless the U.S. National Weather Service, a source approved by that Service, or a source approved by the Administrator, issues a weather report for that airport; and
(2) At airports within the United States and its territories or at U.S. military airports, unless the latest weather report for that airport issued by the U.S. National Weather Service, a source approved by that Service, or a source approved by the Administrator, reports the visibility to be equal to or more than the visibility minimums prescribed for that procedure. For the purpose of this section, the term "U.S. military airports" means airports in foreign countries where flight operations are under the control of U.S. military authority.
(c) If a pilot has begun the final approach segment of an instrument approach procedure in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section and after that receives a later weather report indicating below-minimum conditions, the pilot may continue the approach to DH or MDA. Upon reaching DH or at MDA, and at any time before the missed approach point, the pilot may continue the approach below DH or MDA and touch down if--
(1) The aircraft is continuously in a position from which a descent to a landing on the intended runway can be made at a normal rate of descent using normal maneuvers, and where that descent rate will allow touchdown to occur within the touchdown zone of the runway of intended landing;
(2) The flight visibility is not less than the visibility prescribed in the standard instrument approach procedure being used
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Funny

Any body else think its funny that in this post one simple question was asked and yet of the 10 or so people that responded to the question only two people directly answered the question?
 
The question itself is an utterly pinhead question... anyone who would ask it in an interview is either an utter idiot, or asking it to see how the applicant deals with nonsensical questions (i.e. are you condescending when a non-pilot asks basic or even stupid questions -- a fair thing for an HR type to be interested in). Or to see who has "insight" (i.e. gouge) into the questions being asked.

But I'd lose all respect for any pilot who actually thought I ought to know the answer to such a question in an interview.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom