USAirways CLT PBR Recall

[Bringupthebird]

Are you drunk? Not one BPR member voted in favor of the MOU, and not one BPR member voted against pilots having the opportunity to vote on it. Every BPR domicile voted the same freaking way!

They all voted the SAME way. Are you going to recall everyone from every domicile?

Are you drunk?

They voted to overrule the recommendations of the people who were at the table and in doing so eliminated most any chance of the NAC being taken seriously in negotiations ever again.

Evidently THEY were drunk!

I would support a wholesale housecleaning of the BPR whose utter stupidity will wreak havoc on this pilot group for many years.

This pilot group will elect the sort of progressive representitives that give power back to the line pilots, not pretend that they know better, while advancing their own agendas.

 

[Turtle21]

They voted to overrule the recommendations of the people who were at the table and in doing so eliminated most any chance of the NAC being taken seriously in negotiations ever again.

Evidently THEY were drunk!

I would support a wholesale housecleaning of the BPR whose utter stupidity will wreak havoc on this pilot group for many years.

This pilot group will elect the sort of progressive representitives that give power back to the line pilots, not pretend that they know better, while advancing their own agendas.

You just don't get it. The ENTIRE BPR voted to recommend the pilots reject the COMPANY MOU OFFER. The BPR did not in any way reject the work of the NAC, they simply strengthened the NAC's credibility (ie "The company offer does not cut it.).

The BPR was passing out the MOU. The company freaked and pulled it because they didn't want to risk the voice of the entire pilot group saying the same.... NO MORE CONCESSIONS!

Aim your gun down range, Bro.

 

[Bringupthebird]

You just don't get it. The ENTIRE BPR voted to recommend the pilots reject the COMPANY MOU OFFER. The BPR did not in any way reject the work of the NAC, they simply strengthened the NAC's credibility (ie "The company offer does not cut it.).

The BPR was passing out the MOU. The company freaked and pulled it because they didn't want to risk the voice of the entire pilot group saying the same.... NO MORE CONCESSIONS!
.

What color is the sky in your world?

McKee is the only one spouting your party line and he doesn't have a shred of credibility. The professional negotiator did not come back and say," Gee if we had more time we could have gotten a good deal." They said this was the best deal we will see. The BPR said they knew more than the negotiator and wanted to play them and the company so that they could try and pull off the tough-guy persona (they have failed at miserably every time they've tried).

The company can't "pull" the MOU any more than the BPR can (and in effect did) 'pull' the MOU from the line pilots, just to advance their agenda. It's been negotiated and is ready for presentation to the pilots for approval just as it would have been presented to the board for approval.

Now the BPR has again made the entire pilot group look like idiots, idiots without protections and signing bonuses, by the way.

Wake up! USAPA has failed you every single time they've opened their mouth. Good luck with the mercy of the APA.

 

[Bringupthebird]

And the pilots lost the ability to reject concessions when they handed the keys to the union to the Angry F/O's.

 

[vetrider]

This will be a fart in the wind. There won't be any recalls.

 

[Flybywire44]

Does United or Delta have a min fleet clause?

 

[Turtle21]

Does United or Delta have a min fleet clause?

If they had one would they give it up?

 

[Flybywire44]

If they had one would they give it up?

I asked because I don't believe Delta has a minimum fleet, but I know that DAL does have other negative events that trigger if mainline aircraft are removes. ie. reductions in regional aircraft.

Maybe someone can supply more information on this subject.