Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

US Airways, pilots looking at regional j

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

big dog1

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 28, 2002
Posts
179
Thursday, February 05, 2004

By Dan Fitzpatrick, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

In another sign of warming relations between US Airways and its unions, executives with the Arlington, Va.-based airline tomorrow plan to discuss with labor leaders how the company can meet its financial obligations without resorting to a sale of some hub operations, its Washington-New York-Boston shuttle or other assets.

"We are not going to default" on $900 million in government backed loans received last year as the airline emerged from bankruptcy, spokesman David Castelveter said, adding "options other than asset sales" will be raised when leaders of the pilots, flight attendants, machinists and reservation workers meet with the company.

US Airways' board met yesterday in Charlotte, N.C., where it was expected to talk about the challenges the airline faces as it continues to lose money and tries to avoid defaulting on the government-backed loans. The board also was expected to discuss any asset sales that might help it raise much-needed cash. New York investment banker Morgan Stanley was hired in December to examine those options and accept bids from other carriers, and several airlines have expressed interest.

But with labor groups signaling a willingness to discuss some concessions, US Airways has started to downplay talk of asset sales. In a message to employees last Friday, Chief Executive Officer David Siegel said it is "not inevitable" that the airline would have to sell any assets of can get its costs down through labor agreements.

To that end, the pilots this week agreed to discuss the company's desire to use regional jets -- smaller, cheaper-to-operate planes that were to serve as the backbone of MidAtlantic Airways, a commuter airline to be based at Pittsburgh International Airport and scheduled to start this spring. Everything from the number to be flown, where they would be concentrated, whether US Airways pilots would fly them and under what work rules would be on the table.

Observers speculated all the focus on regional jets could suggest a rethinking of MidAtlantic even before it has a chance to begin. The company is worried that GE Capital Corp., which financed a large order last year for the RJS from Brazilian aircraft maker Embraer and Canadian aircraft maker Bombardier Aerospace, would pull its commitments if the airline's junk credit rating falls any further.

To prevent that from happening, US Airways is contemplating a strategy that would involve selling or transferring some of the RJs on order to other US Airways Express commuter operators not owned by US Airways. That way, the planes would still operate under the US Airways banner, but the company could relieve itself from the costs of operating and staffing them.

Such a change would require the approval of the pilots union. "The company needs to extricate itself from direct operation of regional jets," said local airline analyst Bill Lauer, and is likely conducting a "massive rethink" of MidAtlantic because of the capital expenditures it would require.

US Airways has already contacted Phoenix-based Mesa Air about buying some of the 170 RJs on order from Embraer and Bombardier, and has raised the idea in a meeting with GE, its regional jet financier. If another carrier is willing to buy the planes, operate them more cheaply and provide regional jet service for US Airways on a contract basis, "Why not let them do it?" Lauer said.
 
So... "Rethinking" MidAtlantic really means "stopping MidAtlantic before they really get started".

Hmmmm....

I thought that MidAtlantic was already training pilots. If they transfer the flying (and the airplanes) to as-yet unnamed carriers, does MidAtlantic simply cease to exist?
 
As far as I know Mid Atlantic has about 60 or so pilots trained. Many of course are instructors. To the best of my knowledge, There are three completed EMB-170s down in Brazil ready to be picked up. But there has been some problems with the "conditional" certification and if MDA is gonna fly 'em with this type of certification (at least to do proving runs) or (as a delay by Sea-gull) wait until full certification. Today and tomorrow should prove interesting because of the BOD meeting. We'll see. Good luck to us all.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top