Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

TSA says it will cut down on 'granny pat-downs'

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

DieselDragRacer

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Posts
11,056
In response to public outrage over "granny pat-downs," the Transportation Security Administration will ease screening procedures for airline passengers 75 and older at O'Hare International Airport, officials said Wednesday.

The new screening protocols, to begin as a test on March 19 at O'Hare and three other airports, are similar to the less-intrusive screening implemented last year for children 12 and younger, the TSA said.

It means elderly passengers won't have to remove their shoes and light outerwear at airport screening checkpoints, officials said.

And instead of automatically being patted down if an alarm sounds, they will be permitted to go through touch-free screening equipment a second time to resolve the issue, officials said.

The policy shift is part of a new TSA focus to put more scrutiny on potentially high-risk passengers, said Kathleen Petrowsky, the TSA federal security director at O'Hare.

TSA screeners will make a visual assessment to determine which passengers are 75 or older and inform them of changes to the screening procedures, Petrowsky said.

Individuals may still be required to remove their shoes and undergo a pat-down if anomalies are detected during security screening that cannot be resolved through other procedures, she said.

In addition to O'Hare, the new screening will be tested at Denver International Airport, Orlando International Airport and Portland International Airport, the TSA said.
 
I saw congress has had it with them dragging their feet on letting airports go to private sceening contractors.
 
But thankfully I'll still get my free groping if I'm traveling out of uniform. After all, it's the uniform that counts, not the actual id badge.
 
18 USC § 2381 - Treason


Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason...
I will probably get disappeared for posting this, but I find it at least arguable that the tactics and shenanigans perpetrated by the TSA in the name of "national security" fit the above definition.
 
But thankfully I'll still get my free groping if I'm traveling out of uniform. After all, it's the uniform that counts, not the actual id badge.


I was just thinking this same thing last week as they were throwing away my 4oz bottle of suntan lotion. Lame.
 
I find it at least arguable that the tactics and shenanigans perpetrated by the TSA in the name of "national security" fit the above definition.

Really?

Exactly which part "levies war against" passengers or "adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort"?

Perhaps you don't grasp what it is to levy war against.... Spoiler alert! It's a bit more intense than taking your shoes off.

Are you cutting for an 'aid and comfort" angle? That would be more along the lines of what Pakistan provided for Osama.... It doesn't mean that Al Queda is comfortable with citizens being harassed.

Our greatest enemy is the histrionic, hyperbole, drama-queen, rhetoric that has been allowed to hijack the common-sense from national discourse.

Please stop it. You are hurting us all.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top