LR25 said:
Aggreed, nukes are not the answer, we would just isolate ourselves from the rest of civilized society, even though we are fighting an uncivalized enemy.
There is certainly a danger that we will lose several of our allies if we use nukes.
The Arab nations would probably balk, and it's hard to imagine the Europeans would be very thrilled.
But at that point, would it matter? The pro-nuke crowd could argue that after a weapon of mass destruction is used against American troops or on American soil, and if it kills thousands, if not hundreds of thousands with the potential in some cases to kill millions over time, the time for diplomacy is over.
At that point, one could say, Americans would demand the use of overwhelming military force to put an end to the threat, to hell with what the world thinks.
My father spent his whole life as an intelligence officer, he once said that the first shots in any nuclear war would not be fired in response to a nuclear attack, they would be fired in response to a rogue nation employing chemical or biological weapons upon a civilian population. He always envisioned a rogue attack upon Israel from the likes of Syria, Lebanon, Iran or Iraq. In which case everyone knew that nothing would stop Israel from retaliating.
He always tried to reassure us during the late 70’s and early 80’s as children growing up on the out skirts of DC that the Soviets were not our biggest threat.
Becky