Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

This guy was an accident waiting to happen...

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

YourNameHere

REMOVE BEFORE FLIGHT
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Posts
99
NTSB report finds inconsistencies in pilot's record

07/08/2006
Associated Press

The Yamhill County man who was piloting a plan that crashed last year in Hillsboro, killing four people, may have used false identification to get a new pilot's license, according to a National Transportation Safety Board report.
Michael McCartney may have also played up his flight experience on federal aviation documents, The Oregonian reported in its Saturday editions.

McCartney was flying with his wife, Pam, and friends Art and Jean Pogrell of Cedar Mill when they crashed seconds after takeoff from Hillsboro Airport on May 24, 2005. Everyone onboard was killed.

McCartney was piloting his Mitsubishi, two-engine MU-2 on a flight to Salem when it spun to the ground after climbing to about 1,000 feet.

The plane is considered difficult to handle in emergency conditions without special training. NTSB investigator Debra Eckrote said earlier that McCartney, 60, had not received any special training before taking the plane's controls.
The NTSB report contains no conclusions about the likely cause of the crash. That may come before the end of the year, said Keith Holloway, an NTSB spokesman in Washington, D.C.

But the safety board report does note that a manager with an Oklahoma company that worked on the plane after McCartney bought it thought McCartney handled the controls like a student pilot and urged him to take the classes before flying it alone.

The safety board's report also says McCartney, who with his wife owned Max Aviation & Development near Newberg, lost his commercial flying certificate in January 1985. The report offers few specifics, saying only that it was "under suspension for several regulation violations and was subsequently revoked."
McCartney reapplied for a license in 1987 using a slightly different name and Social Security number. He listed his first name as "Mychal" and provided a Social Security number ending in 0688 rather than 0866.

Knowingly using a false Social Security number violates federal law.
Holly Baker, a spokeswoman for the Federal Aviation Administration in Atlanta, said FAA rules allow for relicensing under some circumstances after one year, she said. Baker added that the change in McCartney's name spelling, while unusual, would not necessarily violate FAA standards if the name was changed legally.

On filing for a new flight license under a different Social Security number, she said, "that's definitely unusual."

Investigators also note that McCartney's listing of his hours of flying experience varied greatly.

In May 1989, the report notes, McCartney said he had 7,500 hours of flight time, with none in the preceding six months. Eighteen months later, he said he had 13,000 hours with only 50 hours flown in the preceding six months, the report said.

Investigators examined flight logs McCartney completed and found his actual flight time, both as a pilot and a co-pilot, was about 2,170 hours in all aircraft.
___ Information from: The Oregonian, http://www.oregonlive.com

http://www.kgw.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D8IO15HO3.html
 
Why did he have to pick the dreaded MU-2 death machine, more ammunition for the MU-2 haters of the world. :angryfire
 
Say Again Over said:
Why did he have to pick the dreaded MU-2 death machine, more ammunition for the MU-2 haters of the world. :angryfire

I didn't pick it. The pilot that crashed did.
 
I remember that accident! was not much left of the bird...I live in the area
 
100LL... Again! said:
We need to find a way to weed those people out.

There has to be some way to cut them out of our herd, so to speak.

That's why BFR is the single most important control on these kind of people. I have met so ma plane owners that simply don't care about recency of experience or BFRs. So be really anal if you are a CFI.

Even with the very thorugh BFR you won't be able to take care of people that never show up for one. In those cases Darwin works his wonders.
 
100LL... Again! said:
We need to find a way to weed those people out.

There has to be some way to cut them out of our herd, so to speak.
The dreaded ramp check is about the only way I can think of. In 11 years I've never had anyone question me walking onto a ramp, or ask for a logbook/tickets/medical other than on a check ride. People just take for granted that when someone says their a pilot, there's an inherant level of skill and professionalism. Unfortunatley, people lose their lives putting their trust in the hands off ass clowns like this guy. If it had been just him alone, I'd be more upset about the loss of the airplane than him.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top