ktulu34535
BoneDriverinTraining
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2003
- Posts
- 38
In my training I've done Private ASEL, Instrument ASEL, Commercial ASEL, Commercial, MEL.
The reason for this sequence of course is because thats how Riddle wants it done.
I was wondering what the validity of doing your ratings in this manner is?
Would it not make more sense (for the amount of money) to do Private MEL, Instrument MEL, and then go back and add the ASEL licenses/ratings.
You would have a ton more hours PIC of a multi and you can always go back and the single engine ratings/licenses so you can instruct single engine.
Or does this violate a fundamental principle of training, the building block theory that obviously in the beggining stages of training an SE airplane is going to be easier for the student. And that if the student was introduced to multi first he/she would be so lost that the extra PIC time would be meaningless.
Any opinions...
The reason for this sequence of course is because thats how Riddle wants it done.
I was wondering what the validity of doing your ratings in this manner is?
Would it not make more sense (for the amount of money) to do Private MEL, Instrument MEL, and then go back and add the ASEL licenses/ratings.
You would have a ton more hours PIC of a multi and you can always go back and the single engine ratings/licenses so you can instruct single engine.
Or does this violate a fundamental principle of training, the building block theory that obviously in the beggining stages of training an SE airplane is going to be easier for the student. And that if the student was introduced to multi first he/she would be so lost that the extra PIC time would be meaningless.
Any opinions...