Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

The Costa Citationair

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
1108 would ostensibly represent both groups in making a deal for the CA check airmen to fly with the FO line pilots. Will 1108 now sign an LOA allowing line pilots to fly with ATCO pilots, having won arbitration to avoid just that, since the CA guys won't be employees? Will they negotiate contract day rate for the CA guys providing training? If they participate in this would they ever have any hope of organizing any other group, having cannibilized their newest chapter to protect their home group? How will the FO guys like flying with contractors getting paid probably twice as much as them during the integration, knowing that 1108 negotiated both pay scales?

And say what you want about not needing experience, but this is high risk. Bringing in a new program usually means training a core of a few check airmen, bringing in the first three or four planes, then growing at a pace that allows captains to build experience while the fleet grows. By the time the fleet approaches 19 planes, that's over a year and there are a number of experienced pilots to fly with the newbies coming in. Not to mention the ground experience with the plane's capabilities and maintenance needs. Bring in a whole fleet, even over a 6-8 month period, and you're going to have a bunch of crews with little type experience, being supported by Ops and Mx teams with little experience. Unless there's a long-term contract with a significant number of CA captains, this is a recipe for trouble.

This isn't just about learning new EPs, performance numbers and the box and passing a type ride, which any experienced pilot will be able to do just fine. This management team doesn't exactly have the greatest track record on managing risk well. All FO pilots have been here long enough to remember the cowboy days during the first fractional growth spurt. Anyone think the company's been sliding back that way? The ol' seat of the pants approach, thinking everything will work out just fine, will put crews and pax at risk.

My condolences to the CA folks if this happens. I hope that, if it does, you hang together and negotiate an extortionary contract rate to come over and provide the seed experience for the newest FO 'value' fleet. And for those predicting that owners exit the program, I think you're partially right. There will be a number who never did and still won't want to be a customer of the 'value' player in the industry. But I bet there'll be a sweet deal, including reduced or no redemption fee, to trade over to a 'luxury' Flex contract - which has the dual benefit for KR of having a higher margin as a share sale, and bringing business over to the non-union side of the house.
 
Last edited:
Compare:

Flight Options​

Probable Cause8/23/2003Wichita, KS Cessna 172P N55326CHI03LA280Nonfatal

Not sure how you tag jet blast caused by a couple of third-party mx techs, at a retail mx shop in ICT to Options?
 
Has anyone noticed that Flex Jet Pilots (NON UNION) get to keep there jobs and CA Pilots (Unionized) Don't? Does anyone see the CULTure that KR is trying to build. Hes growing his company while at the same time breaking the union down and eventually eliminating it!!!
 
Don't buy the marketing hype when someone tells you otherwise.

I don't buy it. But it seems like many on this board do.

Diggertwo-- I read those statistics a few way and not sure what conclusion you want us to draw" (1) FO has more incidents overall, or (2) CA has more incidents in the more immediate past. For the statistics to be more accurate we should also see NJA and Flex statistics as well as putting the rate of incident against aircraft or flight flow or some other relative measure.
 
1. Disengage Ego.
2. Lets talk facts.

Those that can afford to fly privately do so after exercising due diligence. When a customer is told their contract will now be flown by pilots with zero time in said aircraft, new company, different management, different SOP's, etc, - I dont know, if it were me, I'd re-think the entire deal. After all, I'd have the resources to choose my private lift provider, and it certainly would not BY DEFAULT be a company that I had not previously chosen. Get it?

Has nothing to do with EGO, everything to do with what the truth IS.

Make sense?

This is gonna be fun to watch. :)

Calm down, they're just Citations.
 
Don't buy the marketing hype when someone tells you otherwise.

I don't buy it. But it seems like many on this board do.

Diggertwo-- I read those statistics a few way and not sure what conclusion you want us to draw" (1) FO has more incidents overall, or (2) CA has more incidents in the more immediate past. For the statistics to be more accurate we should also see NJA and Flex statistics as well as putting the rate of incident against aircraft or flight flow or some other relative measure.

Nja owner, do the numerous overrun accidents concern you as the sophisticated consumer of private aviation that you presumably are? You have to be curious ad to what cultural characteristics may exist that could be a contributing factor.
 
Newkem -- I am NOT the one saying any one set of pilots is so superior to the rest. Quite frankly, all that I have seen appear to me to be about the same. In reading NTSB reports I did notice a NJA crew that forgot to close and lock the cabin door, ignored the annunciator and the door opened in flight. I also saw the one about the NJA crew that ran into the snow bank. And, while on an NJ flight I actually witnessed a NJA Falcon 2000 clip a snowbank with the end of the wing (they were taxiing in front of us), but did not find that incident or spend too much time looking for it. I also saw the report about a problem due to faulty maintenance by NJA. These incidents were all in the past few years, not a decade + ago. None of the frax are "perfect". I haven't looked at the database in years -- thanks for refreshing me.
 
Up till about 2006 (Sherringa) Options had around 1000 pilots and as many as 220 airplanes. A whole lot more operations in a 13 yr period than Shares has ever had so I would think you would find more incidents.
 
Has anyone noticed that Flex Jet Pilots (NON UNION) get to keep there jobs and CA Pilots (Unionized) Don't? Does anyone see the CULTure that KR is trying to build. Hes growing his company while at the same time breaking the union down and eventually eliminating it!!!

Bingo!

FLOPs will own non-union Flex and CA is out of business regardless of where the business goes. Something is going on at XO jet- maybe another buyout?, Delta private jets is imploding, what's going on at TMC? there is only gonna be 2 major frax left so who else is IBT 1108 going to attract? All Ricci has to do is blow up the existing pilot group by pitting furlowed pilots against flying line pilots. Look for a decertification vote soon...
 
Last edited:
Bingo!
? All Ricci has to do is blow up the existing pilot group by pitting furlowed pilots against flying line pilots. Look for a decertification vote soon...

What happens if Ricci goes away and another Sherringa or Sanjay take over and start running the company from a bean counters point of view?

What amazes me is that you all think the Pilots are pissed the union.

We know that the union wants us to be paid more money and Ricci does not.
It is that simple.

Why would the FO pilots turn their backs on those who want them to earn NJ wages and throw their support to those who want them to earn Mesa wages?
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top