Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Tell me it is not true!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Union is the only solution

WileE,

One of those guys fired from Floptions was a coworker of mine back in the commuter days. I've talked to him about his firing, and I believe him when he says that they COMPLETELY FABRICATED the grounds for his dismissal.

Now, is there a back story? I'm sure that there is. Most pro-union guys weren't fired. They picked these few, not only to set an example, but probably because they were simply disliked by some or all of management.

Do you want your job hanging on that tenuous thread? Haven't any of you ever inadvertantly pissed off one of your managers?

What about those very senior guys at Flex who got dismissed when Bombardier ordered a downsizing. Clearly they just weren't their manager's favorites.

Only a union (or a very expensive personal lawyer) can protect you from these bogus subjective decisions. It's your career and probably your family's livelyhood on the line. Send in your union cards.
 
The facts areout there, open your eyes.

Well I did not last long. This WileE is a low life that I cannot sit by and let him get away with his lies. He attempt to attack the character of those terminated. As he knows those terminated were the most well known supporters of the union effort at RTA. Read the deposition, every one stated they knew these men were supporters of the union effort. They used their names in their post and emails. The Chief Pilot at RTA and now 135 Chief Pilot at FLOPS said nothing that would warrant termination. He even said that at RTA Yeager could not have been terminated. This WileE character should also read the deposition of the witness from California. It is available on that other board. The RTA CP said that all of those terminated did a good job and he never had any trouble with them. The fleet manager of the 800XP at RTA said that they were exactly what he wanted in his PIC’s. Not the first person from management from RTA or FLOPS could say anything bad about Jeter or Tumlin and comments about Bowden and Brunet were almost as good. None of them ever had any complaints from owners at RTA, never any training problems, never any professional problems of any kind. They were all very experience pilots with unblemished records. Read the deposition and there can be no doubt that the management of FLOPS violated the RLA and the rights of those terminated. Why protect the guilty? Why try to blame the victims? Why hide the truth or hide from the truth? It is as if some at FLOPS are hoping for an injustice and that the company wins. How can they be so stupid not to understand that they would also lose? It will not happen.

To see the deposition of Coombs go to the http://pub97.ezboard.com/brtapilots General, page 2.



From: Lynn Daugherty [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2002 10:36 AM
To:
Subject: Secure?

Is this message secure? or will it or any portion be auto forwarded? I need to make sure we can talk about issues without having to worry about other ears.

We need you to help us on the list. Flight Options has requested it. We have been assured that no one else will know. These guys started this union business and should pay. They don't want them over there.

Call me.
Lynn
 
I agree with PUG

It's not unusual for pilots to be skeptical, they just want to make the most informed and best decisions they can. I don't think it's unreasonable for the pilots on this board to doubt you either, Aspiring. If you are trying to give reasons for unionizing, throw some positive ones in there once in a while too.

For all the Options Pilots, I would not let a poster on this forum dissuade you from your decision to unionize. If it were me, I would have sent that card in as soon as I received it. As far as anyone knows that poster could be a member of management trying to rub you the wrong way.

Here are a few facts about a Union:

1. A Union is a democracy, every pilot has one vote.
2. A contract is an agreement between Co. and Union (Pilots).
3. A contract is enforceable by law.
4. Union Dues are 1.5% of income and tax deductible.

There are too many more to list here, but, you get the idea. A Contract is the best reason I can think of for being unionized. The contract is an agreement between the company and the Pilots (Union). It is voted in or rejected by the pilots. It establishes a set of work rules that the company and union must abide by. These rules are negotiated by the union and company instead of dictated to the pilots by management. If the contract is breached by the company, they usually reward the pilot financially.

For Example:

At NJA per the contract, the company cannot work a pilot in excess of 14 hours without PILOT approval.

If a pilot returns to his/her gateway after midnight on their last day of duty, it's an extended days pay, or a compensatory day off.

If pilot reurns to their gateway after 0300 on their last day of duty, it's two extended days pay (approximately $850).

These are just a few examples. A contract gives you choices and protects the pilot group. Personally, I would never work for an airline or large fractional that wasn't unionized. When a company gets too big and the focus shifts to increasing the profit margin, the employees tend to suffer the most. Good luck in your decision.
 
Their character?

Apparently they didn't make much of an impression on the coworkers I've met that knew them. I haven't met an actual RTA pilot who actually knew the guys who would go out of their way to defend them. Does that mean that there aren't a bunch of guys out there who hold them as the paragon of professional virtue? No, there might be a ton of them out there that I haven't met yet. I'll keep asking around, but so far nada. I would certainly trust other actually RTA and FO pilots I talk to before I'll even come close to what comes out of your keyboard A2B, especially having read your past history on these type threads.

As I said, I don't know all the facts and I'm certainly not basing a decision as irreversable as inviting in a union of so far questionable effectiveness (as evidenced by the lack of results with the netjets negotiations) based on one deposition and against everything I've heard actually working the line. Especially since I've never heard of a deposition that didn't tell the whole story (sarcasm).

For Live4flyng I know all about unions and the airline industry, I was a member of ALPA for quite some time and suffice it to say I was less than impressed by their effectiveness and honesty. I was quite happy to come to a company that isn't a closed union shop. So far I haven't seen anything that makes me wish for the kind of hostile working environment that comes with union. I certainly know that having a union when you need one is very important, but just having one because everyone else does and not because management has treated their employees badly is a mistake IMO. A union is a necessary evil at times where management is a greater evil, but if you don't need it stay the heck away from one.

I haven't met a FO pilot (even a lot of former RTA ones) who felt that a union would make FO a better place to work. Everyone I know feels that they are being treated fairly. Do I know everyone who works here and what their story is? Of course not. I'm fairly new at the company so I ask around to everyone I fly with and meet out on line to see how stuff is going in their little part of the world, and everyone has been overwhelmingly positive so far. Even a guy who was leaving the company after five years to take a chief pilot position with another private company had nothing but positive things to say to another pilot about his experience working here (and he was former RTA).

I know right now that as much as Aspiring is trying to push the IBT, he is certainly not helping their cause. Maybe if he wouldn't be so rabid about it and wasn't so offensive he would be setting a better example.
 
your extended day pay is based on your extended day rates.

For me it would be 346.70 for the first extended day and 414.98 for every day after. Next year the rates change for the higher but i'm too lazy to look it up.

Another point.

If we are not realistically scheduled to get home, ie. airlining through chicago to get home and there's a snow storm in chicago. Or they book us an airline with less than 2hrs from scheduled block in time from the leg coming in. Both those points pretty much garantee you a after midnight or 2 days pay. or 1 day pay one comp day.
 
NJA pilots make 1.5 times their daily rates for an extended duty day. A 4 year captain's daily rate is $317.96 resulting in $476.94 per extended day. I was trying to use round numbers to get a point across. So, for a four year captain, two extended days will cost the company $953.88. A first year BBJ pilot makes $1112.64 for the first extended day, multiply that by two and it pays to get in after midnight!

WileE, don't be too quick to judge what the Union has done for NJA. As evidenced by the BBJ LOU, Union negotiations resulted in an 87% vote in favor. Sorry that ALPO let you down, but they really don't care too much about regional airlines, except when you aren't paying dues or bringing them passengers.

I'm not trying to sway anyone to vote either way, I just believe competition is a good thing for all sides. Nothing evil, just increasing the standards of pay and work rules across the board.

Aviation is one of the most dicked up industries. Companies hire like crazy when the economy starts to pick up, and then furlough 10 times the amount they hired if there is one little hiccup. It's nice to have a contract though.
 
I flew with one of the lawsuit guys in another life and will do anything I can to keep him from flying at NJA. He wants a union cause he is more into what he is NOT going to do than what it takes to get the job done. As to unions, I see the need for a contract, but after that, the improvements, beyond what was promised me at hiring, have come in response to market forces and the pilot shortage of years past, not anything I can see the Teamsters have done. I personally think it hurts us more than helps us to be Teamsters in dealing with NJA management, if for no other reason than the image. I certainly do not see where we get $1 million worth a year from the Teamsters. I would like to see NJA transition to a Fractional Pilots Assoc after the contract and hopefully have an organization that would be acceptable to the other pilots of the industry. Just my opinion and worth exactly what it costs you.
 
Looks like old*art has got his head planted squarely on his shoulders!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top