Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Selection Process

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
We did NOT take the Muse Pilots. As a "youngish", "foolish" group representing by a foolish leadership, decided they were going to play hardball and hold out for a "better" deal once we purchased them. Did'nt work out too well for them. We ultimately did hire a few of them in subsequent years at which time they happily joined the bottom of the list and had (most gone now) great and financially rewarding careers. The others.... Guess that ALPA type mentality didn't serve them well.

Hopefully some can learn from others mistakes.

BUS

Your arrogance mind numbing. Why isn't being at the top of the current heap enough for you? What possible benefit do you derive from rubbing other people's nose in it? While I sincerely hope you never see things from the other side, being part of "them" and not "we" for a little while would probably do you some good. Before you fire back some witty retort, I don't work for Airtran nor have I ever had a particular desire to work for SWA although I do think it is a a truly outstanding company.
 
Interview'em and stick'em to the bottom of the list. Its just not fair to the hard working pilots who made SWA what it is. You AT guys need to be more humble. Actually, SWA should do a LOT of triming before stapling these unknowns. Interviewing sounds like a prudent idea to me. Of course, this sounds biased on the other side of the fence, but its not. The ball just aint in your court. Thats life. I really dont know where all this preferential entitlement comes from.
 
Interview'em and stick'em to the bottom of the list. Its just not fair to the hard working pilots who made SWA what it is. You AT guys need to be more humble. Actually, SWA should do a LOT of triming before stapling these unknowns. Interviewing sounds like a prudent idea to me. Of course, this sounds biased on the other side of the fence, but its not. The ball just aint in your court. Thats life. I really dont know where all this preferential entitlement comes from.

Life isn't fair.
 
Interview'em and stick'em to the bottom of the list. Its just not fair to the hard working pilots who made SWA what it is. You AT guys need to be more humble. Actually, SWA should do a LOT of triming before stapling these unknowns. Interviewing sounds like a prudent idea to me. Of course, this sounds biased on the other side of the fence, but its not. The ball just aint in your court. Thats life. I really dont know where all this preferential entitlement comes from.


It comes from a legal right to arbitration and the fact that GK said he intends to operationally merge the companys. Past arbitraton results seem to favor the pilots with the weaker contract. It seems arbitrators don't define fair and equitable the same way most pilots do. It is what it is and it will only cost me about $500,000 in lost income.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top