Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

"Seat of the pants"

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Flying by the seat of your pants is nothing more than getting a feel for the airplane. When you first start to fly, like anything, you don't have a feel for it. Eventually do. The same is true of horseback riding, motorcycle riding, juggling, and the simple acts of eating, walking, and drawing. Nothing more.

The feel of flying is perishible, just like all flying skills.

When I began flying, I left high school to start crop dusting. I did that for some years, and then took an overseas assignment which didn't involve much flying at all. When I left for that assignment, the airplane was an extention of my mind. I thought about where I wanted the airpalne to go, and the airplane merely did it. When I returned from my break from flying, it was a different matter. I was thinking one thing, but the airplane was doing another. I had to relearn the airplane, relearn the feel, re-learn to fly.

That is seat of the pants. It comes from the old barnstorming admonition that you feel the airplane through your seat. You feel one cheek get heavier in the seat than the other, you push rudder on that side. You feel both get heavier, you're probably climging, you push forward. Flying by the seat of the pants means not really having to think about it, you merely do it.

Flying by the seat of your pants means listening to the slipstream, feeling the stick or yoke, etc. In an open cockpit it means feeling the pressure of the wind on your face, and the way it struck your face. It means feeling the position of the throttle, it means getting in tune with the airplane so you're on the same page.

In other words, the same thing you did when you learned to walk, but doing it in an airplane. Don't let anybody tell you it's difficult or beyond you. Fly enough, and it doesn't take much, and you'll be flying by the seat of your pants. It just isn't rocket science.
 
All this is very interesting, as a CFII and as a military instructor pilot I have never heard any of this. I guess in different types of flying such as open cockpit, crop dusting, or tactical jet there are many different opinions on what "seat of the pants" actually means.
I guess in whatever type of flying you end up doing, it's best to talk to your instructor about this and do some research on your own. As you can see avaition is quite diverse and there my be more then one right answer to the same question.
 
Fury220 said:
Wow, a whole 50 hours and we've decided that pilotage is born, not taught. :) Whateva, man...I could teach a monkey to fly a cessna from point A to point B.



That would be quite an accomplishment.

earl
 
Bjammin said:
VFR flying with little or no horizon can be just as dangeous as solid IFR...The bad stuff happens with no horizon...Be very careful when flying in poor weather conditions with little instrument experience...Bottom line, trust you instruments, NOT YOUR SEAT...
Well put Bjammin. Having an instrument rating (or even an ATP and a boatload of experience) doesn't make you immune form the effects of spatial disorientation. Often we assume that it's only the
"VFR only" private pilots that are subject to this. That's not correct. I've lost a few highly experienced ATP rated friends to spatial disorientation. A non-instrument rated pilot encountering actual IMC conditions can usually measure his life expectancy (and that of his passengers) in minutes, and precious few of them at that. Experienced, instrument rated pilots tend to "buy the farm" on night, VFR, "dark hole" takeoffs.

'Sled
 
earl said:
Fury220 said:
Wow, a whole 50 hours and we've decided that pilotage is born, not taught. :) Whateva, man...I could teach a monkey to fly a cessna from point A to point B.



That would be quite an accomplishment.

earl

kind of like you using the "quote" button correctly, huh?


Just kidding, man -- it was nothing but a figure of speech. Flying a <100hp bugsmasher around is in many ways easier than driving a stick (sts). It's CERTAINLY not a "yer either born with it or yer ain't made to be a pilot" type of business.

cya
 
I believe Folding Experts avatar is from an old Twilight Zone episode. The guy in the airplane is William Shatner and the face outside the window is the beast that haunts him through out the episode.
 
Ya I am not very good at the whole quote thing, but a mans' got to know his limitations.

earl
 
Ryan said:
I believe Folding Experts avatar is from an old Twilight Zone episode. The guy in the airplane is William Shatner and the face outside the window is the beast that haunts him through out the episode.

Sweet. I love how monsters from the 50's and 60's all wear suit coats. They take their monstering seriously.

-Goose
 
Ryan said:
I believe Folding Experts avatar is from an old Twilight Zone episode. The guy in the airplane is William Shatner and the face outside the window is the beast that haunts him through out the episode.

i believe, no no, i know, you are correct...
 
I remember flying with a rather wooden FO once so I spontaneously looked to my left, became very agitated, started shaking, and screamed, "There's a MAN on the wing of this PLANE!"

I'm pretty sure he thought I was insane. I guess he didn't see that episode.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top