Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Questions regarding a 757

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Metro752 said:
The Russians

there is a lot of evidence that points towards the Russians. Personally Ive always thought it was LBJ who worked with his texas oil buddies and defense contractors who all wanted to stay in Vietnam and continue to escalate the cold war
 
SeanD said:
The wings did not tear through cars, they caused minor damage to them such as dented in roofs and broken glass. The wings were damaged enough to spill out fuel. I believe the wings are usually the strongest part of an airplane. Remember we are talking about a 757 here and believe it or not that is what hit that building. Over 100 witnesses on the ground say so, some with vast aviation experience.
Or just maybe someone from the future opened up a port hole and froze time for 5 minutes to get them all off the plane before it hit and replaced them with genetic doubles of each passenger (Millenium)

so a wing will just cause "minor damage" and the airplane will stay on a steady course? looks to me like somebody with skills about as high as the blue angels would have to be the pilot

and an object flying at 300+ miles an hour very close to the ground cannot be easily identified. especially by eyewitnesses who are known to be unreliable
 
big_al said:
so a wing will just cause "minor damage" and the airplane will stay on a steady course? looks to me like somebody with skills about as high as the blue angels would have to be the pilot

and an object flying at 300+ miles an hour very close to the ground cannot be easily identified. especially by eyewitnesses who are known to be unreliable

Nothing is reliable but it was spotted many minutes before impact at higher alt. I have been to airshows and can tell the difference between an F-16 zipping by at high speed and its less than half the size of a 757. I trust my friends word 100% over any conspiracy theory.
 
big_al said:
an object flying at 300+ miles an hour very close to the ground cannot be easily identified. especially by eyewitnesses who are known to be unreliable

Really? The last time I was at an NHRA event, when Kenny Bernstein flew by at 300+ I was certain I saw a red top fuel dragster with a Bud logo. And he was ON the ground. :cool:
 
big_al said:
there were other cameras confiscated by the FBI immediately and not released. IE the cameras from the gas station and hotel nearby


And of what value do you think they were to the 757 impact?

Every hotel and gas station cam I've ever seen is aimed at the cashier or the parking lot and pumps from above looking down.

Have you ever seen footage of scenic vistas from either type of place? Have you ever seen fast frame footage from these places? All I've ever seen is barely visible B&W low res crap.

But don't let that diminish your scummy, cluess little tapdance on the memories of those that died that day.
 
If they were going to make this up, wouldn't they make a video of a crystal-clear 757?
 
You know,
all the guys/gals I know that work for the FBI, they just love screwing over the public, expecially if it means starting a war, and then having thousands of soldiers die. Yep, everyone in the FBI/CIA they HATE Americans, that's why they go through all this trouble of tricking them and killing them.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top