Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Political contribution flights

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

cvsfly

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2002
Posts
723
We need some quick advice. Our company as an LLC is primarily a Part 135 company and we also do Part 91 for the owner, his family and friends. The owner likes to extend himself to the state governor and other political candidates and incumbants. Sometimes we have chartered and sometimes these have been offered as freebie flights. In the past I have always operated and documented these under 135 rules just to cover my butt because I was unclear of the possible implications. Now we have a request for a freebie flight that will take us over our 135 duty day. So I'm unclear with the arguement that since we are receiving no direct compensation for this flight is it Part 91 or the fact that the owner will record the flight as either a contribution or at least write it off for operating cost and utilization for tax purposes, is it more on the 135 side. If we were strictly 91 the we could refer to 91.321 - and then it might not even apply since we are not requesting any compensation. How does the IRS look at the use of aircraft for "friends" of the owner as opposed to a corporate officer when no money changes hand, but the owner does defer/writeoff the utilization (SIFL accounting formula) cost? What documentation, other than as noted on a flight log, if any is required to differentiate 91 from 135 flights?
 
I would say if the owner arranged it and told somebody they could use his/her aircraft that it would be part 91 flight. Is the owner going to be on the airplane for the flight? It is the owners plane he can let anyone use it, right? That's just my thoughts. Also if you are worried about duty time. If you are able to get a day room and go off duty that might be away around it. Just my 2 cents.
 
No owner on board. No option for day room. Many legs, unpredictable schedule. Spoke with FSDO. They are fine with it as Part 91 and the only record is the flight log. Of course we still account for the flight time (quarterly/yearly) and rest requirements prior to or after any 135 flights. The IRS maybe another issue depending on how the boss writes it off, don't know.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top