Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Please help

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Bill Nelson

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 22, 2002
Posts
467
I am posting this again because I know people quit reading threads after the old farts start in with thier, "its the right thing to do act."

Please call or write your senator today.

The House passed HR 5576, an appropriations bill for the DOT, HUD, and District of Columbia. It did not contain any provisions to change the age 60 rule in it.
HR 5576 then went to the Senate appropriations committee for amendments prior to being voted on. While there, the entire text of S. 65 was added in Section 114 under Administrative Provisions -- Offfice of the Secrety of Transportation (link:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...sismU9:e379863: ) . This amendment is a back door way of getting legislation passed.
There is a way to have it removed, but it will require a Senator to object (a point of order can be made) to it once it is reported to the Senate. The bill has been reported to the Senate and is on the calendar under General Order Number 535. If the point of order is sustained (it should be, since this is a legislative rider on an appropriations bill), the bill will go back to the Committee on Appropriations. This is based on the Rules of the Senate, Rule XVI, paragraph 2. Link: http://rules.senate.gov/senaterules/rule16.php

In order to stop the change from slipping in through the back door, it will require an effort on your part to write, fax, or e-mail (in order of preference) your Senators to express your opinion. Since there is more resistance to the change among the Democratic party, I'd recommend writing Democratic Senators outside of you home state if you have the time.
Here is a link to all Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contac...nators_cfm.cfm
If you click on Web Form, it will usually take you to an e-mail form to send. If you click on the Senator's name, you will find mailing addresses and fax numbers.

On the Democrat side, I'd recommend concentrating firepower on Sens Inouye, Lautenberg, Rockefeller, Cantwell, Dorgan, and Pryor. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/?&dbname=cp109&sid=cp109S6pOz&refer=&r_n=sr225.109 &item=&sel=TOC_17092&
 
It is a matter of "money" folks, keeping the top seniority for an additional 5 years just won't happen. Give it a rest already
 
60 is plenty old. Retire and do pt 91 job if you wish. Why did'nt you plan you career to retire at a appropriate age? I have not biased I am not going to or have I flown for the airlines. I love the gray haired captains but I don't need grampa up there at the helm with 400 people behind them. I know a guy at UPS that is angry retired at 60 got a flight engineering job, can't afford to retire. Tough, you picked the career, bought the house, the 130,000 twin, the Cessna 172 that you restored and spent of 55,000 on.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top