Re: I agree with the above post,
bart said:
We just hired a pilot position that paid about 50% less than "market" (according to salary surveys). The salary was posted in the ad and we had 400 responses from qualified applicants in 48 hours.
Well GOOD FOR YOUR COMPANY.
It must make them very proud at the end of the day that they can SCREW AN EMPLOYEE and pay an excessively (50% less) low wage just because they can. And I'm SURE they mentioned to your new employee how many respondents they received!!!
I too just hired someone this past year. I took the salary right from NBAA and adjusted it slightly better than median. I too could have hired someone EASILY for less than half of what I paid. But our company does not want to be know for doing that, but for paying a competitive wage.
Several things occur in your example....
1. The employee will become acustomed to slutting themselves out, perpetuating the problem.
2. You get what you pay for. Employees don't like to feel taken advantage of, and when excitement of getting off unemployment wears off, you'll have an employee that resents you. And when the market shifts, you'll get the loyalty you deserve.
3. The company you work for gets know for how it likes to take advantage of employees.
You think companies like Kodak, GE, IBM, Coke, ect.... are our there hiring FO's for 20 grand and CPT's for 40 grand because the market will let 'em do???
I DON'T THINK SO!!
First-class oufits don't pull that crap, which is one of the things that differentiate them from oufits like yours.
Your outfit can take that 'supply and demand' attitude and SHOVE IT UP THEIR A$$.