Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Pilot furious at U.S. for silence on bomb

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

DieselDragRacer

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Posts
11,056
Editor's note: Steve Danyluk is an international first officer for a major U.S. airline and president of The Independence Fund, a nonprofit that supports troops wounded in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.


(CNN) -- Following the attempt to bomb a passenger jet on Christmas Day, President Obama said that "once the suspect attempted to take down Flight 253, it's clear Homeland Security and Aviation Security took all appropriate actions."



I am a commercial airline pilot who was deep over the Atlantic flying from St. Kitts and Nevis for nearly six hours on Christmas Day following the attempted bombing on Flight 253.



I only learned about the incident after landing when I looked at the CNN Web site on my iPhone. I'm justifiably furious that I was not notified while airborne.


Our government clearly dropped the ball. President Obama has ordered a review into the intelligence failures leading up to the attempted Christmas Day bombing by Umar Farouk AbdulMutallab, but an equally important review needs to be made into how events were handled once AbdulMutallab attempted to carry out his plan.



Specifically, why weren't the actions the Transportation Safety Administration outlines in our aviation manuals initiated, and what took place inside the federal Domestic Events Network in the immediate aftermath of the terror attempt?


Following the 9/11 review, the DEN was given the task of instituting new procedures for controllers on how to communicate information about suspicious aircraft throughout the system.


The Washington-based DEN Operations Center is supposed to allow federal agencies with jurisdiction over the security of U.S. airspace to communicate information in real time. So why, after eight years and billions of dollars, was the information concerning the incident available to me only on my iPhone?


Like many commercial pilots, I flew in the military. There, each squadron maintains something called a pre-mishap plan. Basically, it's a three-ring binder with a series of actions the watch officer is supposed to take when a mishap happens.



It's a very useful tool -- but only if the officer who is assigned to carry out the plan is familiar with the binder's contents. Good commanding officers run simulated mishap drills within their squadrons to ensure their junior officers effectively execute the plan.


I'm left with the sickening sense that after 9/11, the government spent horrific amounts of money to create the "mother of all" pre-mishap plans, but never effectively tested it. Why? Because unlike the military, where commanding officers rise up through the ranks based on professional competency, our government operates on a different model.



How else does one explain the failed governmental response to natural disasters like Katrina, or man-made disasters like the Christmas Day bombing attempt?


The silver lining is that AbdulMutallab's failed attempt gave us that test of the response system. It can only be attributed to luck that unlike 9/11, this was not a coordinated attack involving multiple aircraft.



Now that the gaping holes in our response have been exposed, let's do a thorough review of what took place on Flight 253 and ensure we have professionals in decision-making positions who will execute the plan if this happens again.


The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Steve Danyluk.
 
He's got a point Ableone. Take a good look at the TSA folks at the airport. These are the SAME people that are in Washington and are charged with protecting us and our airspace!

Bet you have a warm-fuzzy feeling now, don't ya!
 
I have a feeling that International Steve is one of those quick draw types just itching to release his inner security guard.

I am sure you know the type; The FFDO who hopes everyday that someone will breach the cockpit and allow him to show the word his badass side.

if he had known what would he have done differently? Told the flight attendants that if someone tries to set themselves on fire they should take it a little more seriously than usual.
 
"Steve Danyluk is an international first officer for a major U.S. airline and president of The Independence Fund, a nonprofit that supports troops wounded in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. "



Well...Mr Danyluk puts his name to his beliefs in an International press release.

What have YOU done today? ( Whined about the lack of / quality of, your Crew Meal? )

We need to support people like this.


YKMKR

P.S. - YES. I do know the "Gunslinger / Barney Fife" type. I would rather have several thousand "Barney's" ...than NONE at all. As long as they weren't TSA morons....
 
Last edited:
I don't know about his airline, but at 15:30 local in LAS (30 min prior to push) on the 25th there was a note on our release. It said something to the effect of how "there has been an attempted use of an incendiary device on a US bound international flight" and to "exercise extreme vigilance". I called my wife who immediately turned on CNN, who was at that time still reporting that someone had tried to light fireworks.

I think our airline did a pretty fair job. Maybe this guy's airline just sucks. (shrug)
 
Steve ought to first work through his union instead of sticking his head above the ridgeline.

I do, however, agree with his sentiment.

Gup
 
Let me guess steve is one of those FFDO guys that accomplished FFDO school because of a certain small appendage he has.

The morale to this story: we are and always will be vulnerable. From the date of your birth until your 80 birthday, you have a 1 in 800,000 chance of dying in a terrorist attack....a 1 in 80 chance of dying in a car accident.....a 1 in 100 chance of dying from the discharge of a hand gun. It always numbs my brain to watch the like of Fox news and your typical red neck uneducated pilot constantly obsess about issues that in the whole scheme of things, matters little compared to other issues.
 



Well...Mr Danyluk puts his name to his beliefs in an International press release.


I make statements to the media all the time but my press conferences are not well attended. ( I suspect a vast left wing conspiracy )

Seriously though I do write the occasional letter to Aviation Week under my own name. (So far they have published all of them)

What have YOU done today? ( Whined about the lack of / quality of, your Crew Meal? )

My crew meal was excellent today, thank you very much.

We need to support people like this.

I disagree

YKMKR

P.S. - YES. I do know the "Gunslinger / Barney Fife" type. I would rather have several thousand "Barney's" ...than NONE at all.

Good luck with that one. I am not excited to be in close proximity to your Barney Battalion but maybe it's just me.
 
I have a feeling that International Steve is one of those quick draw types just itching to release his inner security guard.

I am sure you know the type; The FFDO who hopes everyday that someone will breach the cockpit and allow him to show the word his badass side.

if he had known what would he have done differently? Told the flight attendants that if someone tries to set themselves on fire they should take it a little more seriously than usual.

An FFDO can't carry a gun on international routes.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top