Part 135 - SE IFR

[SkykingC310]

Can you confirm that it is now legal to fly IFR in a single-engine airplane under part 135 regulations?

 

[osy007]

I think that it always was?

It just had some extra requirements for the a/c..

something like 2 batteries, 2 alternators..blah blah blah etc...

 

[ackattacker]

I think that it always was?

It just had some extra requirements for the a/c..

something like 2 batteries, 2 alternators..blah blah blah etc...

It was actually a change a few years back, used to be prohibited. There's a thread on it that goes into a lot of detail, do a search for "Saratoga IFR 135" and you should find a lot more info.

 

[CUBMAN]

Se Ifr

Wasnt the prohibition strictly for pax operations.

Cub

 

[Nolife]

I think it was pax but even then I'm not sure it was illegal, just restricted. Cargo ops have been flying SE IFR for a long time now.

 

[iflyjets4food]

There's a company called SATSair (i think that's the name) that flies pax in the Cirrus.