Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Now Congress is concerned about USAir's attempted Takeover

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

General Lee

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Posts
20,442
By John Crawley
WASHINGTON, Jan 21 (Reuters) - Congressional lawmakers are concerned a merger between US Airways (LCC.N: Quote, Profile , Research) and Delta Air Lines (DALRQ.PK: Quote, Profile , Research) will trigger wider consolidation and hurt consumers by reducing service and increasing fares.


But in interviews with key members, their staff, lobbyists and consultants ahead of Wednesday's Senate Commerce Committee hearing on the hostile proposal revealed no consensus in the new Democratic-led Congress that lawmakers should oppose the $10.5 billion deal if it moves forward. Concern centers on losing hubs, routes or low-cost service mainly in eastern states. Lawmakers are also sensitive to more industry job losses and pension cuts. Unionized pilots at bankrupt Delta oppose a merger with US Airways. "I assume there are going to be some mergers in the aviation industry but I think each one has to be looked at on its own merits," said Sen. Trent Lott, a Mississippi Republican and member of the commerce panel. Lott is also an influential supporter of Delta, which wants to emerge from bankruptcy this year as a stand-alone company.


Congress cannot block a merger, but opposition from a number of lawmakers or a mix of key members could complicate deals, industry and congressional observers said. "Congress is skittish over everything that happens in the airline industry and can find ways to work with regulators to make your life miserable. One way or another, they can exert influence," said aviation consultant Darryl Jenkins of Embry Riddle Aeronautical University. I'm Delta right now, I'm spending all of my time in the halls of Congress and talking to every mayor and chamber of commerce," Jenkins said. Atlanta-based Delta is trying to convince members the merger would harm service and face uphill antitrust review. Delta Chief Executive Gerald Grinstein says Delta will be stronger on its own.

Grinstein's counterpart at US Airways, Doug Parker, has been pushing a case for winning Justice Department antitrust review, if Delta's creditors accept the offer. Parker, in Capitol Hill meetings, also has promoted his view that a merged company would be a muscular and efficient airline that could compete effectively.
Both Grinstein and Parker are expected to testify before the Senate panel.
Rep. Jerry Costello, an Illinois Democrat and the new chairman of the aviation subcommittee in the House of Representatives, said the House has a tentative hearing scheduled for mid February if the US Airways plan proceeds.

Delta creditors have until Feb. 1 to decide.

"I'm skeptical of mergers in general. I'm concerned about what mergers will do to competition and what it does to capacity as well as jobs," Costello said. "In the case of Delta, where they may be able to survive without a merger, I think we have to look at that," Costello added.
Democratic Sens. Charles Schumer of New York and Byron Dorgan of North Dakota have expressed reservations about the merger proposal on grounds it could hurt service to small communities. Dorgan is a member of the Senate commerce panel.

Lawmakers also question if Delta/US Airways would "open the floodgates" for consolidation. Bankrupt Northwest Airlines Corp. (NWACQ.PK: Quote, Profile , Research) has talked with Delta about a possible merger and United Airlines (UAUA.O: Quote, Profile , Research) and Continental Airlines (CAL.N: Quote, Profile , Research) have held discussions with each other, industry sources familiar with the talks have said.

The last two big airline mergers -- bankrupt US Airways and Parker's America West Airlines in 2005, and American Airlines (AMR.N: Quote, Profile , Research) and TWA in 2001 -- rescued failing companies (TWA/US Airways) and attracted little attention from Congress. But a United/US Airways proposal generated strong lawmaker opposition prior to collapsing in 2001 over antitrust concerns. Consumer reaction will also be a factor in how Congress approaches mergers, industry experts agree.

"They won't block out what the public believes particularly at a time when you may be looking at two carriers (Delta/Northwest) facing some economic difficulties that could cancel flights and do other things," said aviation attorney Ed Faberman.




Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Last edited:
What a bunch of tools - dull ones at that. Continental would buy United as soon as the DAL/USA deal goes through...


That is why Congress doesn't want it. I think there may be some consolidation anyway, but mergers with little job loss and no overlap. USAir and AWA just merged, and there was a good mix of routes and fleets to make it happen. I don't think anyone objected to that one. It was a good fit. I see NWA and DL coming out of BK stand alone, and then proposing a merger, and then CAL/UAL could get together. Some mergers make sense, and some do not. Congress does NOT want to see job loss, major hub loss, and small cities losing service or choice. Anyone thinking Southwest or Airtran would just move in and fly to these small communities is not correct. Those smaller cities are probably served by RJs or props, and Southwest or AT/JB would have no interest unless they could fill multiple mainline planes a day.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
revealed no consensus in the new Democratic-led Congress that lawmakers should oppose the $10.5 billion deal if it moves forward.

Its comming and congress will not stand in the way. In the end there will be 3 old timers and the rest LCC's jmo.
 
Congress is concerned? Seems like they're more concerned about providing "free" healthcare and SS benefits to non citizens and ensuring more USA jobs go to China all the while keeping their areses in DC. So far they're doing a real good job at that. Apologize for the rant.
 
Two things make me laugh... #1 - you bold quoted an Embry-Riddle professor. Much love to the school I spent a few g's at...but I thought you only posted bold quotes from people who matter in the situation? I don't think he does...but correct me if I'm wrong.

"But in interviews with key members, their staff, lobbyists and consultants ahead of Wednesday's Senate Commerce Committee hearing on the hostile proposal revealed no consensus in the new Democratic-led Congress that lawmakers should oppose the $10.5 billion deal if it moves forward."

Didn't feel like bolding that one eh? Sure it wasn't a direct quote from a talking head, but I think its significant to the article.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom