JP,
I sent him a PM about the same thing and got basically the same response. I agree with you that it is VERY misleading to have it posted that way. I understand his logic, but I still believe that it is labeled incorrectly.
767 considers it 7.5% of salary, but has it reading as a 7.5% match. Which it is not. It is a 50% match, which may not be the best, but it is far above many 401K contributors.
Snakeplt...What exactly is embarrassing about a 50% match?