Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Neal Boortz - NOT a friend!!!!!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Boortz is a flyer himself...I think he owns a Mooney. He's always talking about the trips he takes on his radio show. Since he's a pilot himself, maybe he thinks there's nothing to flying, thus his disdain for airline pilots. Ironic huh? On the one hand always talking to your audience about flying to make yourself seem more interesting and exciting and on the other hand blasting professional pilots because he thinks it's so easy, even a radio talk show host could do it.
 
hbrow15 said:
maybe my facts are wrong, but I thought it was the mechanics that did eastern
It was the IAM, which the mechanics were a part of. It also included the ramp, res., gate, and a few other obscure groups. The pilots didn't ever strike, some chose to cross the IAM lines.
 
Just because Boortz is a GA pilot does not mean he supports the union. His basic opinion is that unions inhibit the free market system. Some of his opinions are legit, others are way off base. Delta, Air-Tran, GM, Ford...he hates them all. Remember opinios are like noses we all have one th difference is he has a radio show and we only have flight info...
 
one other thing... Wasn't the last concession with the Delta Pilots that they would continue negotiating and if there were not a resoultion by March that they agreed to binding arbitration, in turn Delta agreed to stop the 1113?? Can they legally strike?
 
gator_hater said:
one other thing... Wasn't the last concession with the Delta Pilots that they would continue negotiating and if there were not a resoultion by March that they agreed to binding arbitration, in turn Delta agreed to stop the 1113?? Can they legally strike?

YES. The USAToday said Binding arbitration, but they were wrong again. If we cannot come to an agreement, the three man board can only vote up or down on the 1113, but we can still strike. And, Prudence Beatty--our previous BK judge, ripped into the DL CFO on the stand when he said the Railway Labor Act wouldn't allow us to strike. She said "The Federal Courts cannot stop a strike, and what does the Railway Labor act have to do with this?" He didn't answer her. Maybe Bush could stop a strike, but only for a limited time. A lot of people will lose out with a strike, and this posturing we are doing is to get Delta to the table. We have to put it out in the media. Otherwise, they will do nothing and hope the 1113 succeeds. IF it does, we can and will strike. You have to put that out there to get them to negotiate. Bad publicity also hurts future bookings, and a liquidation would not allow management to reap the benefits like UAL did with their stock offering to their 400 top managers---8% of the new stock. Our management probably wants the same. We do have some things that we will not budge on, and they will have to consider that.

Bye Bye--General Lee

Cincinnati Post

Delta pilots: Threat of strike is real
By Bob Driehaus
Post staff reporter
Delta Air Lines pilots have a clear but lengthy path to go on strike and shut down the airline should negotiations that are already going badly hit a dead end.
The union declared Thursday that its pilots would go on strike if Delta successfully petitioned the bankruptcy court to void the pilots' contract and unilaterally impose salary and benefit cuts.
Darryl Jenkins, a veteran aviation industry expert and independent consultant, believes from private conversations with numerous pilots and analysis of Delta's management plans that the threat to strike is not hollow.
"I think this is more than saber-rattling. It would not surprise me if this went all the way. I have never seen a more angry group of pilots than I've seen at Delta right now. They're at the point where they feel that if they worked for free, Delta still wouldn't be able to turn this thing around," Jenkins said.
Negotiations are continuing in the hope of avoiding a strike. Delta sent a memo to senior managers Friday that said the company has lowered its demands in the hope of reaching an agreement.
"Our proposal, in fact, reduces the amount of the $325 million in annual concessions we are seeking from the pilots to $315 million annually, the equivalent of about 1 percent of pay. That change requires Delta to accept greater risk in our restructuring plan, but we feel such a move is worthwhile to demonstrate our preference to achieve a consensual agreement," the memo said.
"Additionally, while there is yet no determination on what will happen with the pilot pension plan, the proposal also includes a proposal for a $300 million long-term, interest bearing note, which would be provided by the Company if, in fact, the pilot defined benefit pension plan were to be terminated in the future."
Delta and its pilots are headed into uncharted waters if they pursue this course, aviation and labor law experts say. While other bankrupt airlines have reached the brink of tearing up labor contracts, last-minute accords have been reached in each case. In turn, no union has ever followed through on threats to strike under such conditions.
But Air Line Pilots Association Chairman Lee Moak said his fellow pilots are unafraid of taking the leap and striking because they question whether they would want to work for a company that would strip away pay and benefits at the level Delta is demanding.
Philip Way, a University of Cincinnati economics professor, said the Railway Labor Act that governs labor relations for airlines ensures that the process for striking is lengthy.
"If there is no agreement, either party can ask to assign a mediator. If the National Mediation Board isn't successful, it declares an impasse, and it offers binding arbitration. The problem is that both parties are supposed accept the offer," Way said.
If the pilots reject binding arbitration, there is a 30-day cooling-off period. If there is still no agreement reached, then the pilots are free to strike, he said, unless President Bush takes the extraordinary step of creating a Presidential Emergency Board.
That board could delay a legal strike for another 30 days, at which time the pilots could walk.
"The good news for the consumer is the procedures are long, and a win-win solution can be worked out in the interim," Way said.
Richard Bales, law professor and interim dean of Northern Kentucky University's Chase College of Law, said Delta is likely to ask the bankruptcy judge to bar the pilots from striking.
"The judge might impose the kind of penalty that broke the New York subway strike a few months back - impose a hefty per-day fine both on ALPA and on individual strikers. (But) it is unclear whether the bankruptcy judge would have the legal authority to enjoin an ALPA strike," Bales said.
He said the union is likely to counter that argument by arguing that an injunction would be prohibited by the Norris-LaGuardia Act, a 1932 law that broadly prohibits federal courts from enjoining strikes.
Lynn LoPucki, a University of California-Los Angeles law professor and bankruptcy expert, said it's an open question whether a bankruptcy judge could legally stop the strike but that it would be in keeping with recent labor battles for Delta to seek that path.
Kelly Collins, a spokeswoman for the pilots' union, said Friday that union lawyers have concluded that the union is well within its rights to strike.
Bruce Hicks, a spokesman for Delta, declined to discuss what strategy the airline would employ if the pilots pursued a strike.
"We believe the best prevention is reaching a consensual agreement, and that's where all of our energies are focused. We're committed to finding a consensual agreement. There is an agreed-upon process in place, and we're going to continue pursuing it," he said.
Jenkins, the aviation industry expert, is pessimistic about the negotiations and disenchanted with Delta's management strategy.
"I have lost all respect for Delta. There was a time when Delta only cared about making money. Now the only thing they're worried about is doing damage to a low-cost competitor. Their strategy on this is just to lose massive amounts of money.
"For years, I (defended) Delta on real awful issues. Today, I just can't see anything at all I want to defend them on," he said.
 
Last edited:
Otto said:
Boortz is a flyer himself...I think he owns a Mooney. He's always talking about the trips he takes on his radio show.

Well, there is always the chance that Neil is a typical low-time Mooney owner likely to over-estimate his abilities. He might get himself in a situation where he would trade everything he owns to have a Delta pilot sitting next to him. He might even have time to change his worldview before the wings fall off.

He's a douchebag.
 
In his defense though, he probably knows how to properly calculate a weight and balance and flight plan, to include selecting a route and coordinating with FBOs. I will also bet he knows how to get a clearance at an untowered airport and obtain a weather briefing. Oh, and he can probably manage an airplane without auto throttles.
 
While I hope the Delta pilots don't strike, I do understand the need to be ready and willing to do so. It is the same thing as the cold war strategy of mutually assured destruction. Delta, NWA, whoever, need to WALK if the 1113 goes through.

Isn't it amazing the lengths that airlines will go through to not raise fares?
 
Boortz doesn't hate all Air Line pilots, just the ones that thump thier union chest and walk around the loca GA airport like their $hit don't stink. That being said he still robably does't fully understand the situation.
 
Boortz doesn't dislike airline pilots. He appears to have great respect for our abilities. He really dislikes unions, though, and seems to think that if it weren't for unions, airline pilots would be free agents able to move between airlines at will, cutting their own deals like other professionals. That may even be true, but I don't see how we could get from here to there. The real problem with this is the seniority system, but I don't know what a viable alternative might be. Anyone?
 
From what I hear here in Atlanta, Boortz isn't a very good pilot. He has a big ego, he is a wantabe airline pilot. He hates all unions, not just ALPA.
 
Blue Dude said:
The real problem with this is the seniority system, but I don't know what a viable alternative might be. Anyone?


the seniority system has good and bad. But, I worry that without it, the definition of a good pilot may change. Do you want pilots cutting corners to save fuel, taking aircraft that should have maintenance, flying when they are too tired. I am sure management would love pilots like that.

Personally I feel secure that if I need to divert, it won't be held against me. If I write up an airplane, no one questions it.

Where I think ALPA screwed up was in not creating a national list right from the start, so that a pilot could move from airline to airline with seniority intact.
 
michael707767 said:
Where I think ALPA screwed up was in not creating a national list right from the start, so that a pilot could move from airline to airline with seniority intact.



Ditto................In addition to keeping your seniority.........pay as well.

AF :cool:
 
I remember when we (CMR) were on strike we had some local yahoo talk show guy trashing us day after day, saying things like "they offered you a raise" and "you guys love to fly, why are you risking your jobs" and stuff like that. Once one of our guys called in and asked him if he wanted to come down and visit our strike center. He said no, and went on and on about how easily repaceable we were and how we'd be lucky to ever fly again. AM radio is just a worthless bunch of blowhards who love to get people all worked up and emotional while presenting 50% or less of the facts. Ask Boortz what he would do if his boss wanted to tear up his contract.
 
fugghedabowdit said:
Ask Boortz what he would do if his boss wanted to tear up his contract.
Great question! I bet Boortz would strike. Wonder if he has Royal Marshall scoped out, or if Belinda would screen struck work.

The Delta pilots have nearly zero negotiating leverage and the word "strike" is percieved to give them a little. However, the path towards mutual assured destruction is never a positive and Delta needs all the tailwinds it can get right now.
 
~~~^~~~ said:
The Delta pilots have nearly zero negotiating leverage and the word "strike" is percieved to give them a little. However, the path towards mutual assured destruction is never a positive and Delta needs all the tailwinds it can get right now.

I disagree there. The Senior folks have much more at stake, thus will be wanting to take whatever concessions come our way. Us folks in the bottom 1/2 of the seniority list really don't have as much to lose. I know of more and more folks asking for PLOA's/MLOA's. Its all about priorities, that's why we vote.
The other part about destruction, is right on!

737
 
I tend to enjoy listening to Boortz but after hearing his opinions a week or two ago on airline pilots and unions I think he's off base. He was saying that instead of striking pilots should make their concerns known to management and try to work on improvements. If their concerns are ignored or their need not met they should then resign. Riiight!

Pretty simplistic view there, Mr. Boortz!

I was hoping someone would call in and debate him on it but i don't know it that has happened since I don't get to listen to him that often.
 
~~~^~~~ said:
Great question! I bet Boortz would strike. Wonder if he has Royal Marshall scoped out, or if Belinda would screen struck work.

The Delta pilots have nearly zero negotiating leverage and the word "strike" is percieved to give them a little. However, the path towards mutual assured destruction is never a positive and Delta needs all the tailwinds it can get right now.

Fins,

I think there is a lot more discontent now, and zero willingness to give anymore. Remember when good old Grinstein had the motto "Do it once, do it right."? We remember that now. Also, we know that our management is watching the UAL situation and their management windfall of 8% of their new stock. That is our leverage. And, Summer bookings will go down if we throw that strike word out there, and that gives us a little bit more leverage. And to top that off, 2300 of our most loyal pilots just left.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
shamrock said:
I tend to enjoy listening to Boortz but after hearing his opinions a week or two ago on airline pilots and unions I think he's off base. He was saying that instead of striking pilots should make their concerns known to management and try to work on improvements. If their concerns are ignored or their need not met they should then resign. Riiight!

Pretty simplistic view there, Mr. Boortz!

I was hoping someone would call in and debate him on it but i don't know it that has happened since I don't get to listen to him that often.

I agree, Boortz (putz) is looking at it from a 'pay to fly' person that only flies when it suits his own interests and enjoyment. He has done nothing but show his ignorance.


GL, with regard to the baggage issue. I was under the impression that most if not all of the DCI carriers were on the low end of the rankings last summer. And right on the bottom with DAL. I searched the net and can't find it but I was shown the graph during training. After witnessing ATL I dont think it was smoke and mirrors. Also, we were told to leave pax bring the bags. No kidding...wierd if you ask me.



And what about the new BK Judge... worse or better than Prudy? Is the new judge gonna help you fellas out on the CBA? Why would you folks keep a CBA? Haven't others just recently been trashed? Precedence?

BTW, I quit smoking when hung up my flight suit and finished my part in providing that blanket of freedom you enjoy so much.
 
Strange - just a couple of press releases from ALPA and the Delta pilots are ready to "burn down the house." Remember the reaction from the Delta pilots when the ASA pilots threatened to do the same (with a whole lot less to walk away from)

Strike, or no strike, Delta will die unless the employees come together and give it their best shot. Since Delta is ASA's biggest customer, I hope that things work out over there.

Strikes take a lot of resources and commitment. ALPA doesn't have a whole lot of either right now and should not be making threats without every intention of actually pursuing this strategy of killing off Delta if they don't get what they want. I think it is a failed strategy from the git go, but Duane is talking like a man ready to see a couple of carriers go under for the common good.

All I know is that I would be very cautious with the "S" word these days.
 
Last edited:
WhatRUSmokinGL? said:
I agree, Boortz (putz) is looking at it from a 'pay to fly' person that only flies when it suits his own interests and enjoyment. He has done nothing but show his ignorance.


GL, with regard to the baggage issue. I was under the impression that most if not all of the DCI carriers were on the low end of the rankings last summer. And right on the bottom with DAL. I searched the net and can't find it but I was shown the graph during training. After witnessing ATL I dont think it was smoke and mirrors. Also, we were told to leave pax bring the bags. No kidding...wierd if you ask me.



And what about the new BK Judge... worse or better than Prudy? Is the new judge gonna help you fellas out on the CBA? Why would you folks keep a CBA? Haven't others just recently been trashed? Precedence?

BTW, I quit smoking when hung up my flight suit and finished my part in providing that blanket of freedom you enjoy so much.

Thanks for protecting us. I appreciate it. The new BK judge is really not doing much except signing the final product. If we cannot come to a mutual agreement by March 1st, then we go to the three man board. I believe they have until March 22 to get everything taken care of. (we have to vote on something by March 22nd I believe) The three man board can only determine if the 1113 process will go through, or dumping the entire contract. IF it gets to that point, we still have the right to strike. This is NOT binding arbitration like the USAToday says. So, in reality, an agreement will have to be agreed upon by the company and Dalpa, and the strike rhetoric will be hyped way up. As I said before, management is salivating about UAL's allotment of 8% of the new stock for management. They would love to have the same deal. A strike would stop that quickly. I don't think we will keep everything we have now, there will be some give and take. But, we have some things that we will not give up, and management has to know that. It will be interesting to watch. NW will go first next week I believe too. Nobody really wants to strike, and no judge wants to be the first to give an 1113c and wipe out a contract. We are coming up on the busiest time of the year for flying (Summer), and things will get NASTY in the press. DALPA has known about this for a long time.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Boortz is an arrogant prick, just like all the other radio blowhards. Pass off opinion as fact and "preach to the choir". You need not be accurate or truthful, just keep your ratings up (and the money flowing) by telling your listeners what they want to hear. Just like Rush Limbaugh and his "Dittoheads". Fortunately for us, nobody in a position of power to actually affect the outcome of the situation is taking his advice. Thanks for your opinon Neil. I'll look forward to the next time I hear you acting like the doofus you are on ATL center.
 
ifly4food said:
Boortz is an arrogant prick, just like all the other radio blowhards. Pass off opinion as fact and "preach to the choir". You need not be accurate or truthful, just keep your ratings up (and the money flowing) by telling your listeners what they want to hear.

Let's see here, "pass off opinion as fact", "preach to the choir", "need not be accurate or truthful".

Can anybody else think of another "forum" for such behavior besides talk radio?
 
lukabrazzi said:
Let's see here, "pass off opinion as fact", "preach to the choir", "need not be accurate or truthful".

Can anybody else think of another "forum" for such behavior besides talk radio?


Fox News?
 
Right now, the DAL pilots should be trying to help the company stay in business and not destroy it. A strike right now would almost definatly shut the company down for good. Not only would you lose your job then and there, but would have trouble finding an equal position somewhere else because the market is already oversaturated with pilots. I'm not tryin to union bash here, but I'm just sayin it's probably in your best interest to roll with the punches today in hopes of still having your job tomorrow.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom