Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Malaysia Airlines Bailout?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Flopgut

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2005
Posts
3,627
http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...nes-survive-mh17-disaster-mh370-disappearance

"It is a tragedy with no comparison. In the history of aviation, no airline has gone through two tragedies of this magnitude in a span of four months," said Mohsin Aziz, an aviation analyst at Maybank.

Seriously?!

"If the public is willing to keep them separate and say they really have little to do with each other, and any common link is not Malaysia Airlines, you can probably survive with the brand relatively intact," he said.

But that is a big if. Five years after Trans World Airlines flight 800 crashed into the ocean near New York in 1996 with the loss of 230 lives, the carrier filed for bankruptcy and was acquired by American Airlines. For an already troubled company, the disaster was the straw that broke the camel's back, said Dekker.

So things that happen to US legacies are simply our tuff luck? We deal with it. Which includes competing with indigenous LCC and world airlines that are SOE [state owned entities] and are bailed out wholly.

This crap is really getting old.
 
Seriously? Why do you care?
 
It's an awful tragedy to be be sure (losing two airplanes like this) but sadly it is not "unprecedented" like the article claims. (You guys did read the article? Or are you just mouthing off because it's me?) The $ safety net that is being discussed for Malaysia Airlines is either privatization or outright bailout. Ok, fine, but that's sure as hell not what was done in this Country for either American or United after 911. If the ATSB had said yes to UAL they might have not gone BK; A post-tragedy BK is not a bailout, it's not even govt help. It's the opposite. (A lorenzo bk is a different thing entirely dan)

I'm posting this because I hope some of you might observe how quickly after this 2nd Malaysia Airlines tragedy, media is already talking of the company's $ health being rescued. Some are also saying *don't* rescue Malaysia, pointing at the fact they have a new airline (the article compares it to Southwest Wave) that some Malay's seem to prefer would prevail.

So we shall wait and see. I hope Malaysia Airlines gets some sort of $ accommodation. And I hope UAL stays around long enough to someday tell Uncle Sam: thanks for nothing!

*You guys don't have a problem with the statement from the banker I quoted at the top of the first post?! That claim doesn't bother any of you?!
 
Last edited:
That would be great Red. You could then get Malaysia to help you write an etops program.

Now THAT ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^is funny... I don't care who you are
 

Latest resources

Back
Top