Look, I "Aint" the best typist in the world, but here goes..I did take the liberty to combine a few words, so this is NOT verbatim. Also, my spelling sucks!:
Couple hundred jets worth of growth next 2-3 years
Spread out cross USA
No one has lower unit costs
Strong balance sheet for growth, finance aircraft for lower costs than competitors
SkyWest and ASA
ASA sept 7 2005
For Delta and SkyW
SkyW 15 year contract for both, and ability to place ac where they would do best, and stay cost competitive
Delta operator that will improve quality, reduce cost, remain competitive, and we would be better than Delta would be.
They got 425 Million at crucial time
assurance contracturally 50% capacity of new growth by being cost competitive
26 most gates at ATL direct lease with Delta is not involved.
ASA since 79 ATL smaller CVG SLC over a billion in revenue, 153 aircraft
Savings of operating 2 is motive.
Back office and IT was provided by contract, instead of inhouse.
5 million a year savings by doing this inhouse 3-5 year target to have cost same at ASA
Seperately, two quite sizeable entities.
Smaller leadership group in dif locations would be better, with employees, rather than have big headquarters away from operations, we are operating them seperately, while developing best practices.
We are geographically diverse, when we bid onnew work, we have maint and ground either near or in place can can be on shared basis for existing and for potential new partner that we will do biz with.
Went over route map.ASA SkyW, etc etc.
90% at ATL 90% at SLC less at CVG Delta
Fleet 380 in 2005
2006 9 900's eventually 76 seats, 92-700's 235 200' 12 atrs 61 EMBs.
Does not estimate any guess at new flying that we may book that will actually come on in 2007. We are optomistic it will be higher in 2007.
2350 flights a day.
15,000 employees
395 ac 267 cities
Regional jet advantage, right size AC for market/ Unit cost on 70/76 seat ac, and turboprop..All markets can't support 140 seat ac
Most people on regionals are good paying passengers, vs, 140 seat where 30-40 are good paying, and the rest are discounted...its about matching it up.
Feed into overseas flights, objective seamless part of network.
Objectives (4)
1 highest qual
2 lowest cost
3 best place to work
4 best investment
Most ontime mainland 2003, 4, 5
Recognized by many on quality.
13650 full time
3900 pilots
750 mechanic
2150 inflight
Competitve pay and base rate, on lower cost side, supplements with profit sharing package, part of why employees are enthuses about their job, based on financial
5.6 Million dollars worth of stock
Grants of stock for employees over 3 years
No unions at Skywest.
negotiating with contract unions to bring these bonuses there.
Major partners, 50% larger than anyone else with United
First one with signed contract with United after their bankrupcy.
First one with Delta with a firm contract after bancrupcy.
Spent 2 years with CAL talk about that later.
We are a top bidder cause we are good at this.
ASA is an important aquisition, as it made our relationship with Delta.
We are well positioned in ATL, even thought we believe Delta will be in good position is anything happens with Delta in ATL.
we bid for 38% of the cost, other 62% pass thru ac cost
Fuel, landing fees, ramp, all passthru.
We are at risk for Labor, overhead, maint, and a fixed amount for other items. we give them the flexibility to move us around, they take the risk on fuel costs and they set the pricing.
Contract are long term, based on staying cost competitive 96% under contract, 4% risk flying.
42% ual, 58% Delta
ASA revenue and profitibility effective Sept 7th and then beyond.
Financial results q 1 quite good.
best balance sheet in industry... important from flex standpoint and financing we paid cash for ASA we still have a cash balance quite healthy, we brought on long term debt with ASA, since march, 2ndary offering, with stock, 90 million dollars drawdown, which is paid off or nearly paid off, so we can keep interest cost low and be in position for growth in next year.
Appreciable opportunites for network carriers with small jets. Expecting on adding one or two codeshare partners..discussions on exceeding 200 airplanes, most are in 70/76 some are potentially in turboprop, and some in 50 seat aircraft..and with confidentiallity agreements, this involves 3 carriers that we dont do business with and ones which we do. We are also considering larger aircraft, maybe not in the USA.
Aqusition op[portunities, we are not on an aquisition binge.
Question, Express yet 69 planes?
Does it open door for SkyW?
does it open up opportunities in EWR IAH.
jerry: yes, yes, yes and yes.
He believed republic would respond, but X jet kept airplanes, so CAL started the negotiations over, and with so many CRJ 200s avail, it may have increased our chances at getting the contract, and shorter haul turboprop opportunities all over.
Q : You own 33% of your planes, to what extent do other carriers control leases on your planes? Can they cancel leases?
Short answer NO. All are either owned by SKyW or leased by SkyW, only one exception, when we purchased ASA we were worried about 50 seater ASA so we asked them to own 40 of the 50 and lease them directly to us. Contracturally they are leased to us on a long term basis, after lease is up, they could come back, and change the terms, but this was at our request.
Q Came out today with good load factors, but company doesnt benefit, due to fixed fee, so you need to add flights or ac to add to margin..As an outsider, can we judge what will happen in future when you add flights?
Ans, Load factor doesnt add to profit, but we sleep better with high load factors.
Its based on how many units, we can do cost reduction, but the cost is so competitive today, it puts us in a better position to get better worth. We did a contract with UAL in BK, that was one of the first with major cost reductions, and we did one with Delta last year, and the margins have been competitive and havent moved around much, since 2003. As of today, they havent changed much in past 2-3 years, what will happen in future is anyone's guess. Some that we are bidding on could be owned by major partners..margin may be different if someone is taking the risk of the aircraft.
Q. Costs, you and two competitors say lowest cost, what competitive edge do you have?
A, there are three that are the same, dont believe any of the three have a cost advantage, we may gain a little after merging..reported cost go all over chart, cause we have dif ground handling that may be above others..but cost are much the same.