Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Light Duty Commuting Aircraft (??)

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

onthebeach

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Posts
240
OK guys, here is the project, let's hear your input:

Looking to identify the aircraft which will do a weekly 400 NM (one way) day/night commute to job location, plenty of airports nearby on each end, most economically.

Looking for single engine, non-retractable, used recip, FAR 91 operation, most likely will be wholly owned by one party.

As far as powerplant, simpler is better, i.e., big carbureted engine preferable to more complicated and sophisticated plant.

Need IFR but not known ice; have flexibility to cancel if wx is too bad, and enough experience to do so.

Four place airplane wanted, will be just one pilot 90% of the time, occasionally with one pax, but need the four place for baggage & contingencies.

Time enroute is not the big constraint.
Operating economy and dispatch reliability, in that order, are the two highest concerns.

Let's hear it, what's the best choice?
 
Piper Dakota (PA-28-236)or Cessna Skylane (182)would be my choices, given the limitations imposed. Your decision is whether you prefer a high or low wing configuration.
 
If you can swing the initial purchase price (about $200k), a used Cirrus SR20 will do 155kts on 10gph, and should be fairly trouble free.
 
Last edited:
You are describing a Cessna 182. Don't be afraid of an old one. The first model year was 1956.
 
Your requirements almost clearly state a 160 or 180 H.P. four-seat fixed gear.

Choices are :

Cessna 172

Piper Warrior
Piper Cherokee 180
Piper Archer

Beech Sundowner

Since your load requirements 90% of the time are one or two, full fuel can be used on almost all your flights with these aircraft and the "muscle" of the more powerful (and very thirsty) 182 or 235/Dakota seems unnecessary.

You're better off putting money in safety systems on more modestly powered aircraft, such as back-up electric attitude indicators, GPS/Nexrad and traffic alert, then spending that on more expensive aircraft that will only save you a half-hour (or less) on most flights.

Maintenance will be quite a bit more expensive on the thirstier birds TOO.

Of all, I'd say the Archer is probably best for your mission.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top